A theoretical inquiry into the role of enaction in cybertherapy

ABSTRACT

Some of the problems faced by Cybertherapy along the last two decades are far from being restricted to technical issues. They entail new challenges of medical education, mainly related with the adequate insertion of new technologies in therapeutic processes without distorting the relation between medical professionals and clients. We contend that the acknowledgment of the effects of the systemic effects of therapeutic applications of virtual reality is not fully predictable and can only be achieved attending to the way the patient enacts certain tasks oriented by goals. Enaction means the patient is placed at the centre of the treatment processes, not only as an informed agent, but also as the agent of change through practice. Focusing on the requirements of Cybertherapy applied to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, we propose a theoretic reflection on the conditions of training and treatment in virtual settings. We underline the decisive role of Health Care professionals in applying and improving the potentialities of biometric sensors, graphic and aural engines in virtual (and hybrid) settings. This role can only be adequately understood within a framework of different levels of recursion of the therapeutic system. Two main levels are referred, the first encompassing the patients adaptation and learning to "move within" the interfaces, the second requiring a reflection on the architecture and design of the physical setting and the computerized rendering of sensory data. Further levels concern the larger framework of therapy, relating to its allocation of resources and the social ends that therapeutic technologies, particularly those concerning mental health, must accomplish.

References

1. Alsina-Jurnet, I. and Gutiérrez-Maldonado, J. 2010. Influence of personality and individual abilities on the sense of presence experienced in anxiety triggering virtual environments. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies (2010), 68, 788--801.
2. Beer, S. 1986. Recursions of Power. In Power, autonomy, utopia. New directions toward complex systems. R. Trappl, Ed., Plenum Press, New York, 3--17.
3. Bouchard, S., Guitard, T., Bernier et al. 2011. F. Virtua l Reality and the Training of Military Personnel to Cope with Acute Stressors. In Adv. Comput. Intell. Paradigms in Healthcare 6. Virtual Reality in Psychotherapy, Rehabilitation, and Assessment. S. Brahnam and L. C. Jain, Eds., Springer, Berlin, 109--28.
4. Bouchard, S., Wiederhold, B. K. and Bossé, J., Arachnophobia and Fear of Other Insects: Efficacy and Lessons Learned from Treatment Process. In Advances in Virtual Reality and Anxiety Disorders, B. K. Wiederhold, S. Bouchard, Eds., Springer, New York, 91--117. DOI=10.1007/978-1-4899-8023-6_5
5. Costa, M. R., Kim, S. Y., and Biocca, F. 2013. Embodiment and Embodied Cognition. In Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. Designing and Developing Augmented and Virtual Environments. R. Shumaker, Ed. Springer, Heidelberg, 333--42.
6. Fromme, J., Biermann, R. and Unger, A. 2010. «Serious Games» oder «taking games seriously»?, In Digitale Lernwelten. Konzepte, Beispiele und Perspektiven. K.-U. Hugger and M. Walber, Eds., VS Verlag, Wiesbaden, 39--58.
7. Gamito, P., Oliveira, J., Morais, et al. 2007. War PTSD: A VR Pre-Trial Case Study. In Annual review of cybertherapy and telemedicine. B. K. Wiederhold, G. Riva, and S. Bouchard, Eds., 5, Interactive Media Institute, San Diego, 191--198
8. Gamito, P., Oliveira J., Morais D. et al., 2008. Virtua l reality therapy controlled study for war veterans with PTSD. Preliminary Results. Studies in Health Technology & Informatics, 144 (2008), 269--72.
9. Gamito, P., Oliveira, J., Rosa, P., et al. 2010. PTSD Elderly War Veterans: A Clinical Controlled Pilot Study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 1 (2010), 43--8.
10. Gamito, P., Oliveira, J., Morais et. al., D. 2010. Serious Games for Serious Problems: from Ludicus to Therapeuticus. In Virtual Reality, J.-J. Kim, Ed., InTech, Online: http://www.intechopen.com/books/virtual-reality/serious-games-for-seriousproblems-from-ludicus-to-therapeuticus
11. Gamito, P., Pacheco, J., Ribeiro, C., Pablo, C. and Saraiva T. 2005. Virtual War PTSD -- a Methodological Thread. Annual Review of Cyber Therapy and Telemedicine 3 (2005), 173--178.
12. Gamito, P., Saraiva, T., Oliveira, J. et al. 2008. Physiological assessment during VR PTSD treatment of a motorvehicle accident patient. Journal of CyberTherapy and Rehabilitation 1, 3 (2008), 258--66.
13. Lawson, B. D. 2015. Motion Sickness Symptomatology and Origins. In Handbook of Virtual Environments. Design, Implementation, and Applications. K. S. Hale and K. M. Stanney, Eds., 2^nd ed., Taylor & Francis, New York, 531--600.
14. Maturana, H. 2002. Autopoiesis, structural coupling and cognition: A history of these and other notions in the biology of cognition. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 9, 3--4 (2002), 5--34.
15. McMahan, R. P., Bowman, D. A., Zielinski, D. J., and Brady, R. B., Evaluating Display Fidelity and Interaction Fidelity in a Virtual Reality Game. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18 (2012), 626--633.
16. Meehan, M., Insko, B., Whitton, M. et al. 2002. Physiological measures of presence in stressful virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 21, 3 (2002), 645--652.
17. Meskó, B. 2014. The Guide to the Future of Medicine: Technology AND the Human Touch. ElektroPress, Budapest.
18. Meyerbröker, K. and Emmelkamp, P. M. Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Anxiety Disorders: The State of the Art. In Adv. Comput. Intell. Paradigms in Healthcare 6. Virtual Reality in Psychotherapy, Rehabilitation, and Assessment. S. Brahnam and L. C. Jain, Eds., Springer, Berlin, 47--62.
19. Powers, M. B., Emmelkamp, P. M. 2008. Virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 22 (2008), 561--569. DOI=10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.04.006
20. Riva, G. 2003. La réalité virtuelle en psychiatrie. Journal de Thérapie Comportamentale et Cognitive, 13, 2 (2003), 101--5.
21. Riva, G. 2005. Virtual reality in psychotherapy: review. Cyberpsychology & behavior 8, 3 (2005), 220--230.
22. Riva, G. 2008. Enacting interactivity: the role of presence. In Enacting intersubjectivity: a cognitive and social perspective on the study of interactions. F. Morganti, A. Carassa and G. Riva, Eds., IOS Press, Amsterdam, 97--114. Online: http://www.emergingcommunication.com/volume10.html.
23. Riva, G. 2009. Is presence a technology issue? Some insights from cognitive sciences. Virtual Reality 13, 3 (May. 2009), 59--69.
24. Riva, G., Mantovani, F., Gaggioli, A. (2004). Presence and rehabilitation: toward second-generation virtual reality applications in neuropsychology. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1, 9 (2004) 1--11. DOI:10.1186/1743-0003-1-9
25. Rothbaum, B. 2005. Commentary on Riva, G. Cyberpsychology & behavior 8, 3 (2005), 239--40.
26. Rothbaum, B., Rizzo, A. and Difede, J. 2010. Virtua l reality exposure therapy for combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1208 (2010), 126--32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05691.x
27. Rus-Calafell, M., Guttiérrez-Maldonado, J. and Ribas-Sabaté, J. 2013. Neurocognition, Presence and Acceptance Of a VR Programme For Psychotic Patients: A Correlational Study. In Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine 2013. Positive Technology and Health Engagement for Healthy Living and Active Ageing, B. K. Wiederhold and G. Riva (Eds.). IOS Press, Amsterdam, 141--145. doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-282-0-141
28. Saraiva, T., Gamito, P., Oliveira, J. et al. 2007. The use of VR exposure in the treatment of motor vehicle PTSD: A case report. In Annual review of cybertherapy and telemedicine. B. K. Wiederhold, G. Riva, and S. Bouchard, Eds., 5, Interactive Media Institute, San Diego, 199--205.
29. Shapiro, L. 2014. When Is Cognition Embodied? In Current Controversies in Philosophy of Mind. U. Kriegel, Ed. Routledge, New York, 73--90.
30. Spagnolli, A., Bracken, C. B. and Orso, V. 2014. The role played by the concept of presence in validating the efficacy of a cybertherapy treatment: a literature review. Virtual Reality 18 (Jan. 2014) 13--36.
31. Tichon, J. and Banks, J. 2006. Virtual reality exposure therapy: 150-degree screen to desktop PC. Cyber Psychol Behav 9, 4 (2006) 480--9.
32. Varela, F. 2003. On the Conceptual Skeleton of Current Cognitive Science. In Beobachter. Konvergenz der Erkenntnistheorien? N. Luhmann, H. Maturana, M. Namiki, V. Redder and F. Varela, Eds., 3^rd ed., Wilhelm Fink Verlag, München, 13--23.
33. Vincelli F., Riva G. 2000. Virtual reality as a new imaginative tool in psychotherapy. Studies in Health Technology & Informatics, 70 (2000) 356--8.
34. Wallach, H., Safir, M., Samana, R. et al. 2011. How Can Presence in Psychotherapy Employing VR Be Increased? In Adv. Comput. Intell. Paradigms in Healthcare 6. Virtual Reality in Psychotherapy, Rehabilitation, and Assessment. S. Brahnam and L. C. Jain, Eds., Springer, Berlin, 129--47.
35. Wiederhold, B. and Rizzo, A. 2005. Virtual Reality and Applied Psychophysiology. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback 30, 3, (Sep. 2005), 183--5.
36. Wiederhold, B. K. and Wiederhold, M. D. 2014. Virtua l Reality for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. In Advances in Virtual Reality and Anxiety Disorders, B. K. Wiederhold, S. Bouchard, Eds., Springer, New York, 211--33. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-8023-6_10

Index Terms

• Computing methodologies

  • Artificial intelligence

    • Philosophical/theoretical foundations of artificial intelligence

• Human-centered computing

  • Collaborative and social computing

    • Collaborative and social computing design and evaluation methods

      • Social network analysis

• Information systems

  • Information systems applications

    • Multimedia information systems