skip to main content
10.1145/2808580.2808647acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

e-Score; impact, perception and uses in music educational institutions

Published:07 October 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Parallel to the very first music expressions as a human activity, developed under some kind of guidelines and precepts, there have arisen relentless efforts and attempts to achieve the long-lasting and stable representation of the musical products being created, in a way that would allow to recreate them as closely as posible to the original event.from the very beginning until the present days, have been many notation systems, formats, and expressions developed with this purpose in mind. With the incursion and implementation of the new digital technologies in the musical activity spheres, a new paradigm emerge in the representation and transmission of the musical work, culminating nowadays with the born of a new music document typology tha may be called digital music score or e-Score.

The aim of this paper is lay down and approach to this new type of object for music texts reading, editing and transmission through a quantitive research, being the scope of the study to analyze and understand how electronic music scores (e-Score) are received, used and perceived by music students and teachers in any of the music learning centers in our country. The main purpose is to provide scientific evidence, through statistical methods, of the level of implementation and use of these new support type for music knowledge transmission, as well as the most influential aspects implied in perception of therm amongst musical community in Spain.

References

  1. Almeida, J. J. et al. 2012. WIKI:: SCORE A collaborative environment for music transcription and publishing. Social Shaping of Digital Publishing: Exploring the Interplay Between Culture and Technology: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Electronic PublishingInformation Services & Use. IOS Press. 133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Applegate, R. 1993. Models of User Satisfaction: Understanding False Positives. RQ 32.4. (1993), 525--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bunge, M. 1993. La investigación científica; su estrategia y su filosofía. Ariel.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Damm, D. et al. 2012. A digital library framework for heterogeneous music collections: from document acquisition to cross-modal interaction. International Journal on Digital Libraries. 12, 2--3 (Jun. 2012), 53--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Demopoulos, R. J. and Katchabaw, M. J. 2007. Music Information Retrieval: A Survey of Issues and Approaches. Technical Report #677. Department of Computer Science; The University of Western Ontario.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dubnjakovic, A. 2010. From Monks to Mutopia: Changing Landscape in Sheet Music Publishing. Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference. (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Duckworth, W. 2005. Virtual Music: how the web got weired. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunn, J. W. and Mayer, C. A. 1999. VARIATIONS: A digital music library system at Indiana University. Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Digital libraries (1999), 12--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. España.Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia 1996. Materiales_de_apoyo_a_la_formación: Guía de uso. Ministerio de Educación.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Fremerey, C. 2010. Automatic Organization of Digital Music Documents -- Sheet Music and Audio. Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Fujinaga, I. et al. 2012. Optical Music Recognition: state of the art and open issues. Int J Multimed Info Retrieval. 1, (2012), 173--190.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Fundación Telefónica 2015. La sociedad de la información en España 2014. Ariel; Fundación Telefónica.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Georgiou, C. A. 2012. Perspectives of music publishing in the twenty-first century: The death of the editor? Hellenic Journal of Music Education, and Culture. 3, 2 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hooper, L. 2013. Contemplating E-Scores: Open Ruminations on the E-Score, the Patron, the Library, and the Publisher. Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference (2013), 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Pope, S. T. 1986. Music Notations and the Representation of Musical Structure and Knowledge. Perspectives of New Music. 24, 2 (1986), 156--189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. e-Score; impact, perception and uses in music educational institutions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      TEEM '15: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
      October 2015
      674 pages
      ISBN:9781450334426
      DOI:10.1145/2808580

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 October 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate496of705submissions,70%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader