Implementation of competences of social and environmental responsibility in IT engineering degrees

ABSTRACT

In the present globalized world, the impacts of engineering are growing in importance, society is becoming more aware of them, and more and more universities are including ethical and social issues into their engineering degree programs. This article describes the experience of developing competences of ethical, social and environmental responsibility in undergraduate IT engineering degrees at the Technical University of Madrid. The implementation of these competences has evolved in recent years and currently they are developed in two specific subjects in the first and third year, and that work is completed in the Final Year Project. This model allows us to reach all the students at different times along their studies and with a acceptable level of depth. It is an integral experience, where appropriate contents, teaching methodologies and assessment methods have been adapted to deal with social issues in our academic context. As lessons learned, we highlight the effectiveness this model for developing the aforementioned competences and the important role of external references (from professional, governmental and academic institutions) to integrate ethical, social and environmental aspects into engineering degrees.

References

1. ABET. 2015. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Available: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/ {2015}.
2. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). 2013. Computer Science Curricula 2013. Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computer Science. Available: http://www.acm.org/education/CS2013-final-report.pdf {2105}.
3. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. Available: http://www.acm.org/about/code-of-ethics {2015}.
4. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). ACM Software Engineering Code of Ethics and Professional Practice. Available: https://www.acm.org/about/se-code {2015}.
5. Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE). 2009. Recomendaciones para la propuesta por las universidades de memorias de solicitud de títulos oficiales en los ámbitos de la Ingeniería Informática, Ingeniería Técnica Informática e Ingeniería Química. Secretaría General de Universidades. Acuerdo de 8 de junio de 2009. Available: http://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2009-12977 {2015}.
6. Bowden, P. and Smythe, V. 2008. Theories on Teaching & Training in Ethics. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies. Vol.13, No.2, pp. 19--26. http://ejbo.jyu.fi/
7. Bragós, R., Alarcón, E., Cabrera, M., Calveras, A., Comellas, J., O'Callaghan, J., Pegueroles, J., Prat, L., Sáez, G., Sardá, J. and Sayrol, E. 2010. Proceso de inserción de competencias genéricas en los nuevos planes de estudios de la ETSETB de acuerdo con el modelo CDIO. IX Congreso de Tecnologías Aplicadas a la Enseñanza de la Electrónica (Madrid, Spain, April 13-15, 2010). Available: http://taee.euitt.upm.es/actas/2010/fulldoc.pdf {2015}
8. Brey, P. A. 2012. Anticipating ethical issues in emerging IT. Ethics and Information Technology. Vol. 14.4, pp. 305--317. DOI=10.1007/s10676-012-9293-y
9. CDIO. 2011. The CDIO Syllabus 2.0. Available: http://www.cdio.org/framework-benefits/cdio-syllabus {2015}.
10. Colby, A. and Sullivan, W. M. 2008. Ethics Teaching in Undergraduate Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education. vol. 97 (3), pp. 327--338.
11. Conlon, E. 2010. Towards an Integrated Approach to Engineering Ethics. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium for Engineering Education, (Cork, Ireland, June 30 -- July 2, 2010). Available: http://www.ucc.ie/archive/isee2010/proceedings.html {2015}
12. Cummings, M. L. 2006. Integrating ethics in design through the value-sensitive design approach. Science and Engineering Ethics. Vol. 12, pp. 701--715. DOI= 10.1007/s11948-006-0065-0
13. Davis, M. 2006. Integrating Ethics into Technical Courses: Micro-Insertion. Science and Engineering Ethics. Vol. 12, 717--730. DOI= 10.1007/s11948-006-0066-z
14. Didier, C. & Derouet, A. 2013. Social Responsibility in French Engineering Education: A Historical and Sociological Analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics. Vol. 19, pp. 1577--1588.
15. ENAEE-European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education. 2008. EUR-ACE Framework Standards. Available: http://www.enaee.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/EUR-ACE_Framework-Standards_2008-11-0511.pdf {2015}
16. ENAEE-European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education. 2015. EUR-ACE Framework Standards. Available: http://www.enaee.eu/eur-ace-system/eur-ace-framework-standards {2015}
17. Engineering Education for Sustainable Development. 2004. Declaration of Barcelona. Available: https://www.upc.edu/eesd-observatory/who/declaration-of-barcelona {2015}
18. Fabregat, J. 2013. Explicit training in human values and social attitudes of future engineers in Spain. Science and Engineering Ethics. Vol. 19-04., pp. 1519.
19. Global Reporting Initiative. GRI Guidelines and Standards Settings. Available: https://www.globalreporting.org/standards {2015}
20. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. IEEE Code of Ethics. Available: http://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html {2015}
21. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14000. Environmental Management. Available: http://www.iso.org/iso/es/home/standards/management-standards/iso14000.htm {2015}
22. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 26000. Social Responsibility. Available: http://www.iso.org/iso/es/home/standards/iso26000.htm {2015}
23. Liebert, W. 2013. Preparing to Understand and Use Science in the Real World: Interdisciplinary Study Concentrations at the Technical University of Darmstadt. Science Engineering Ethics. Vol. 19, pp. 1533--1550.
24. Lopez, D., Sanchez, F., Vidal, E. and Pegueroles, J. M. A. 2014. A methodology to introduce sustainability into the final year project to foster sustainable engineering projects. In Proceedings of Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). Ed. IEEE, (Madrid, Spain, 22-25 Oct. 2014), pp. 1--7.
25. Minano, R. and Fernandez Aller, C. 2015, Guía para trabajar la competencia de responsabilidad social y ambiental. Available: http://oa.upm.es/35542/ {2015}
26. Rathje, D., Spitzer, H. and Zandvoort, H. 2008. How to prepare students for a responsible use of science and engineering. Results from the Workshop Teaching Ethics and Peace to Science and Engineering Students. Ed. H. Spitzer. (Hamburg, Deutchland, 15-17 Oct 2008). Available: http://www.dirk-rathje.de/brochure-teaching-responsible-use-2008.pdf {2015}
27. Segalas, J. 2009. Engineering Education for a Sustainable Future. Doctoral Thesis. Barcelona Tech, UPC.
28. Shuman, L. J., Sindelar, M. F., Besterfield-Sacre, M., Pinkus, H. W., Pinkus, R. L., Miller, R. L., Olds, B. M. and Mitcham, C. 2004. Can Our Students Recognize and Resolve Ethical Dilemmas? Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Ed. American Society for Engineering Education.
29. UNESCO. Teaching and learning for a sustainable future. http://www.unesco.org/education/tlsf/ {2015}
30. United Nations Environment Programme UNEP. 2009, Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. Available: http://www.cdo.ugent.be/publicaties/280.guidelines-sLCA.pdf. {2015}
31. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Cátedra Unesco. 2010. Modelo Educativo UPM. Available: http://catedraunesco.es/me/UPM/Inicio.html {2015}
32. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Innovación Educativa. Competencias genéricas. Recursos de apoyo al profesorado. http://innovacioneducativa.upm.es/competencias-genericas/competencias {2015}
33. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Business Solutions for a Sustainable World. Social Impacts. http://www.wbcsd.org/social-impact.aspx {2015}
34. Wright, D. 2011. A framework for the ethical impact assessment of information technology. Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 13.3, pp. 199--226. DOI= 10.1007/s10676-010-9242-6.
35. Zandvoort, H., Børsen, T., Deneke, M. and Bird, S. J. 2013. Editors' Overview Perspectives on Teaching Social Responsibility to Students in Science and Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 19, pp. 1413--1438. DOI= 10.1007/s11948-013-9495-7

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Computing / technology policy

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

    • Computing industry

      • Sustainability

    • Computing profession

      • Codes of ethics