ABSTRACT
In comparison to other work domains and to the current state of research, we face on the manufacturing shop floor little attention for the role of informal learning as key driver for manual assembly processes. There, smart assistance systems focus on process qualities and outcomes, not on the workers' abilities to cope with novel or uncertain work situations. In this paper we present a conceptual approach on how to integrate cognitive automation and self-directed learning at the assembly workplace. We argue for embedding smart learning behavior, based on the model of cognitive apprenticeship and provided by a cognitive architecture, with existing cognitive automation approaches. The conceptual approach is illustrated with the Plant@Hand smart assembly assistant prototype for the industrial assembly workplace.
- M. Aehnelt and S. Bader. Information assistance for smart assembly stations. In S. Loiseau, J. Filipe, B. Duval, and van den Herik, Jaap, editors, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART 2015), volume 2, pages 143--150, Lisbon, Portugal, 2015. SciTePress.Google Scholar
- M. Aehnelt and B. Urban. The knowledge gap: providing situation-aware information assistance on the shop floor. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: 2-7 August 2015, Los Angeles, USA. 2015.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Collins, J. S. Brown, and S. E. Newman. Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser, 18:32--42, 1989.Google Scholar
- B. W. Crandall and R. R. Hoffman. Cognitive task analysis. In J. D. Lee and A. Kirlik, editors, The Oxford handbook of cognitive engineering, Oxford library of psychology, pages 229--239. Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
- G. Dohmen. Das informelle Lernen: Die internationale Erschließung einer bisher vernachlässigten Grundform menschlichen Lernens für das lebenslange Lernen aller. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BMBF, 2001.Google Scholar
- M. Eraut. Informal learning in the workplace: evidence on the real value of work-based learning (wbl). Development and Learning in Organizations, 25(5):8--12, 2011.Google Scholar
- Å. Fast-Berglund, T. Fässberg, F. Hellman, A. Davidsson, and J. Stahre. Relations between complexity, quality and cognitive automation in mixed-model assembly. Journal of manufacturing systems, 32(3):449--455, 2013.Google Scholar
- M. Kerres. Mediendidaktik: Konzeption und Entwicklung mediengestützter Lernangebote. Walter de Gruyter, 2013.Google Scholar
- R. Koper. Conditions for effective smart learning environments. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1):1--17, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- O. Korn, M. Funk, and A. Schmidt. Assistive systems for the workplace. In L. B. Theng, editor, Assistive Technologies for Physical and Cognitive Disabilities, pages 121--135. IGI Global, 2015.Google ScholarCross Ref
- O. Korn, A. Schmidt, and T. Hörz. Assistive systems in production environments: exploring motion recognition and gamification. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, pages 1--5. ACM, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Krogstie, M. Prilla, and V. Pammer. Understanding and supporting reflective learning processes in the workplace: The csrl model. In D. Hernández-Leo, T. Ley, R. Klamma, and A. Harrer, editors, Scaling up Learning for Sustained Impact, volume 8095 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 151--164. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013.Google Scholar
- T. Ley, J. Cook, S. Dennerlein, M. Kravcik, C. Kunzmann, M. Laanpere, K. Pata, J. Purma, J. Sandars, P. Santos, and A. Schmidt. Scaling informal learning: An integrative systems view on scaffolding at the workplace. In D. Hernández-Leo, T. Ley, R. Klamma, and A. Harrer, editors, Scaling up Learning for Sustained Impact, volume 8095 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 484--489. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013.Google Scholar
- S. N. Lindstaedt, M. Aehnelt, and R. d. Hoog. Supporting the learning dimension of knowledge work. In U. Cress, V. Dimitrova, and M. Specht, editors, Learning in the synergy of multiple disciplines, volume 5794 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 639--644. Springer, Berlin {u.a.}, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Mavrikios, N. Papakostas, D. Mourtzis, and G. Chryssolouris. On industrial learning and training for the factories of the future: a conceptual, cognitive and technology framework. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(3):473--485, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. M. Roth and A. M. Bisantz. Cognitive work analysis. In J. D. Lee and A. Kirlik, editors, The Oxford handbook of cognitive engineering, Oxford library of psychology, pages 240--260. Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
- U. Schiefele and I. Schreyer. Intrinsische lernmotivation und lernen. ein überblick zu ergebnissen der forschung. Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie, 8(1):1--13, 1994.Google Scholar
- D. A. Thurman, D. M. Brann, and C. M. Mitchell. An architecture to support incremental automation of complex systems. In Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1997. Computational Cybernetics and Simulation., 1997 IEEE International Conference on, volume 2, pages 1174--1179, 1997.Google Scholar
- K. J. Vicente. Cognitive work analysis: Toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. CRC Press, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. E. Watkins and V. J. Marsick. Towards a theory of informal and incidental learning in organizations?. International journal of lifelong education, 11(4):287--300, 1992.Google Scholar
- E. Wenger and J. Lave. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives) by. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991.Google Scholar
- F. Wild, P. Scott, J. Karjalainen, K. Helin, S. Lind-Kohvakka, and A. Naeve. An augmented reality job performance aid for kinaesthetic learning in manufacturing work places. In C. Rensing, S. d. Freitas, T. Ley, and P. Muñoz-Merino, editors, Open Learning and Teaching in Educational Communities, volume 8719 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 470--475. Springer International Publishing, 2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Learn but work!: towards self-directed learning at mobile assembly workplaces
Recommendations
Cognitive engineering of automated assembly processes
EPCE'11: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomicsA novel approach to cognitive automation of assembly processes is introduced. An experimental assembly cell with two robots has been designed to proof the concept. The cell's numerical control - termed a cognitive control unit (CCU) - is able to ...
Human factors in the guidance of uninhabited vehicles: oxymoron or tautology?: The potential of cognitive and co-operative automation
Today’s automation is typically tied into work processes as tools actively supporting the human operator in fulfilling certain well-defined sub-tasks. The human operator is in the role of the high-end decision component determining and supervising the ...
Research on Soft Computing Techniques for Cognitive Radio
Presently, the world of wireless communication is going under some crucial challenges, which attracts the attention of several researchers. Cognitive radio is defined as a multidimensional aware, autonomous radio system that learns from its experiences ...
Comments