skip to main content
10.1145/2815782.2815790acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Violent gaming and player aggression: Exploring the effects of socio-psychological and technology influences

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 September 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Given the high levels of violence in South Africa, there is widespread concern among the public that video game violence may be increasing the risk of aggression in players and consequently leading to violence. Employing the General Aggression Model (GAM), this study set out to examine the influence of socio-psychological factors such as excessive gaming and pathological gaming, and technology factors such as interactive richness on player aggression. The research model was tested using survey data collected from 101 university students. Regression analysis indicates that only pathological gaming explains a small variance in player aggression. Contrary to prior studies that make strong claims that violent video game playing leads to aggressive behaviour, these factors made only a negligible contribution to predicting player aggression in this study. Future research should focus on testing multiple pathways that culminates into player aggression. Violent gaming technologies may not be influencing aggressive behaviour as much as stimulating pre-aggressive individuals already predisposed by other socio-psychological factors. Future research should test the above factors with more contextual based socio-psychological factors, within the individual aggressor's family and close-knit social environment. Intervention and prevention programs may be better served by insights into the aggressor's personal, family, and social context rather than technology related behaviours.

References

  1. Anderson, C. A. & Bushman, B. J. 2002. Human aggression. Psychology, 53, 27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Anderson, C. A. & Bushman, B. J. 2001. Effects of violent video games on aggressive behaviour, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal, and prosocial behaviour: A meta-analytic review of the scientific literature. Psychological science,12, 353--359.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, C. A. & Dill, K. E. 2000. Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behaviour in the laboratory and in life. Journal of personality and social psychology, 78, 772.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bartholow, B. D., Sestir, M. A. & Davis, E. B. 2005. Correlates and consequences of exposure to video game violence: Hostile personality, empathy, and aggressive behaviour. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1573--1586.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bhattacherjee, A. Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices (2012). Textbooks Collection. Book 3. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/oa_textbooks/3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Buss, A. H. & Perry, M. 1992. The aggression questionnaire. Journal of personality and social psychology, 63, 452.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Charlton, J. P. & Danforth, I. D. 2007. Distinguishing addiction and high engagement in the context of online game playing. Computers in Human Behaviour, 23, 1531--1548. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Colwell, J. & Kato, M. 2003. Investigation of the relationship between social isolation, self--esteem, aggression and computer game play in Japanese adolescents. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 149--158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Entertainment Software Association. (2012). Essential facts about the computer and video game industry. Retrieved from www.theesa.com/facts/pdfs/ESA_EF_2012.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferguson, C. J. (2007). The good, the bad and the ugly: A meta-analytic review of positive and negative effects of violent video games. Psychiatric Quarterly, 78(4), 309--316.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Ferguson, C. J. (2007). Evidence for publication bias in video game violence effects literature: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 12(4), 470--482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ferguson, C. J., San Miguel, C., & Hartley, R. D. (2009). A multivariate analysis of youth violence and aggression: the influence of family, peers, depression, and media violence. The Journal of pediatrics, 155(6), 904--908.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Gentile, D. 2009. Pathological Video-Game Use Among Youth Ages 8 to 18 A National Study. Psychological science, 20, 594--602.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gentile, D. A. 2011. The multiple dimensions of video game effects. Child development perspectives,5, 75--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gentile, D. A., Choo, H., Liau, A., Sim, T., Li, D., Fung, D. & Khoo, A. 2011. Pathological video game use among youths: a two-year longitudinal study. Pediatrics, 127, e319--e329.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Gentile, D. A., Lynch, P. J., Linder, J. R. & Walsh, D. A. 2004. The effects of violent video game habits on adolescent hostility, aggressive behaviours, and school performance. Journal of adolescence, 27, 5--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. GfK. (2014). GfK Retail Reports, Quarter 4. Retrieved from http://www.gfk.com/be/Retail-reports/Documents/Retail%20Reports%20-%20Q4-2014.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Hsu, C.-L. & Lu, H.-P. 2004. Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information & Management, 41, 853--868. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Grigorovici, D. M. & Constantin, C. D. 2004. Experiencing interactive advertising beyond rich media: Impacts of ad type and presence on brand effectiveness in 3D gaming immersive virtual environments. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5, 22--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Kuss, D. J., Louws, J. & Wiers, R. W. 2012. Online gaming addiction? Motives predict addictive play behaviour in massively multiplayer online role-playing games. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour, and Social Networking, 15, 480--485.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Lemmens, J. S., Valkenburg, P. M. & Peter, J. 2009. Development and validation of a game addiction scale for adolescents. Media Psychology, 12, 77--95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Lemmens, J. S., Valkenburg, P. M. & Peter, J. 2011a. The effects of pathological gaming on aggressive behaviour. Journal of youth and adolescence, 40, 38--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Lemmens, J. S., Valkenburg, P. M. & Peter, J. 2011b. Psychosocial causes and consequences of pathological gaming. Computers in Human Behaviour, 27, 144--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Martin, H. 2010. How Social Context Affects Levels Of Immersion: Does Physical Presence Matter? Unpublished Master of Science Dissertation, University College London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Mcgloin, R., Farrar, K. M. & Krcmar, M. 2011. The impact of controller naturalness on spatial presence, gamer enjoyment, and perceived realism in a tennis simulation video game. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 20, 309--324. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Mncube, V. U. S. I., & Harber, C. (2013). Dynamics of violence in South African schools. Pretoria: University of South Africa. Retrieved from http://www.unisa.ac.za/contents/colleges/col_education/docs/The%20Dynamics%20of%20Violence%20in%20South%20African%20schools.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Pallant, J. 2010. SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS, McGraw-Hill International. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. PwC Southern Africa. (2012). Video games. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.co.za/en/assets/pdf/enm-2013/video-games.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Skalski, P., Tamborini, R., Shelton, A., Buncher, M. & Lindmark, P. 2010. Mapping the road to fun: Natural video game controllers, presence, and game enjoyment. New Media & Society, 1461444810370949.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Tamborini, R., & Skalski, P. (2006). The role of presence in the experience of electronic games. In P. Vorderer & J. Bryant (Eds.), Playing computer games: Motives, responses, and consequences (pp. 225--240). Mahwah:Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. South African Institute of Race Relations (2008). South African schools most dangerous in the world. Accessed on 01/03/2010, from http://www.saiir.org.za/press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Sherry J: Violent video games and aggression: Why can't we find links? In Preiss R, Gayle B, Burrell N, Allen M, Bryant J, Eds Mass Media Effects Research: Advances Through Meta-analysis. Mahwah, NJ, L. Erlbaum, 2007, pp 231--248Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Watson, M., Fischer, K., Burdzovic Andreas, J. & Smith, K. (2004). Pathways to aggression in children and adolescents. Harvard Educational Review, 74(4), 404--430.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Yee, N. (2006). Motivations for play in online games. CyberPsychology & behavior, 9(6), 772--775.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    SAICSIT '15: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Research Conference on South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists
    September 2015
    423 pages

    Copyright © 2015 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 28 September 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    SAICSIT '15 Paper Acceptance Rate43of119submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate187of439submissions,43%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)36
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader