skip to main content
10.1145/2817721.2817738acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesissConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Training of Cognitive Performance in Complex Tasks with a Tabletop-Based Rehabilitation System

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 November 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

As previously shown, tabletops can be used in neuro-rehabilitation to train different abilities that have been (temporarily) lost due to acquired brain injury, like motor skills or attention or visuo-constructive skills. However, complex skills like problem solving abilities have been considered only marginally in computer-based rehabilitation systems until now, partly because "complex skills" consist of a high number of distinct capabilities which makes it difficult to cover at least a large part. Nevertheless, the fun.tast.tisch.~system has recently been extended by a module that aims at training complex skills. This paper describes therapeutic considerations underlying the design and implementation, discusses the interaction modalities used (e.g., the concept of pen-based interaction on tabletops in addition to touch and tangibles) and provides an overview on the module's interaction and graphic design. The module has already been tested with a small number of selected patients in the therapy setting. The findings of these initial tests are summarized and discussed.

References

  1. Michelle Annett, Fraser Anderson, and Walter F. Bischof. 2010. Hands, Tables, and Groups Make Rehabilitation Awesome!. In Proc. of the 15th Annual CyberTherapy & CyberPsychology Conf. 3--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Michelle Annett, Fraser Anderson, and Walter F. Bischof. 2012. User Perspectives on Tabletop Therapy. In Proc. of the 9th Int. Conf. on Disability, Virtual Reality & Associated Technologies. Laval, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mirjam Augstein and Thomas Neumayr. 2014a. Challenges and Opportunities of fun.tast.tisch. in Interactive Rehabilitation Settings. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop Collaboration meets Interactive Surfaces. Walls, Tables, Tablets, Phones, co-located with ITS2014. Dresden, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Mirjam Augstein and Thomas Neumayr. 2014b. Touch and Tangibles -- Interacting with fun.tast.tisch. Results of a Study with Non-Target-Group Users. In Proceedings of the 2014 Workshop on Tactile/Haptic User Interfaces for Tabletops and Tablets (TacTT), held in conjuction with ITS2014. Dresden, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Mirjam Augstein, Thomas Neumayr, Renate Ruckser-Scherb, Isabel Karlhuber, and Josef Altmann. 2013. The fun.tast.tisch. Project -- A Novel Approach to Neuro-Rehabilitation Using an Interactive Multiuser Multitouch Tabletop. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces 2013. St. Andrews, United Kingdom. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mirjam Augstein, Thomas Neumayr, and Irene Schacherl-Hofer. 2014. The Usability of a Tabletop Application for Neuro-Rehabilitation from Therapists? Point of View. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. Dresden, Germany. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Peter Brandl, Clifton Forlines, Daniel Wigdor, Michael Haller, and Chia Shen. 2008. Combining and Measuring the Benefits of Bimanual Pen and Direct-Touch Interaction on Horizontal Interfaces. In Proc. of the Working Conf. on Advanced Visual Interfaces. Italy. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Keith D. Cicerone, Cynthia Dahlberg, Kathleen Kalmar, Donna M. Langenbahn, James F. Malec, Thomas F. Bergquist, Thomas Felicetti, Joseph T. Giacino, Preston Harley, Douglas E. Harrington, Jean Herzog, Sally Kneipp, Linda Laatsch, and Philip A. Morse. 2000. Evidence-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation: Recommendations for Clinical Practice. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 81, 12 (2000), 1596--1615.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Elena de la Guiá, María D. Lozana, and Victor M.R. Penichet. 2014. Tangible User Interfaces applied to Cognitive Therapies. In Proceedings of IUI 2014 Workshop: Interacting with Smart Objects. Haifa, Israel.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Renate Drechsler. 2007. Exekutive Funktionen. Übersicht und Taxonomie. Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie 18, 3 (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Vorstand der GNP, Arbeitskreise der GNP, Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der GNP, Siegfried Gauggel, and Walter Sturm. 2005. Leitlinien der Gesellschaft für Neuropsychologie (GNP) für neuropschologische Diagnostik und Therapie. Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie 16, 4 (2005), 175--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Sanna Koskinen and Jaana Sarajuuri. 2002. Computer-Administered Cognitive Remediation in a Frame of Holistic Neuropsychological Rehabilitation: FORAMENREAB Programs. Acta Neurochirurgica. The European Journal of Neurosurgery (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnny C. Lee, Paul H. Dietz, Darren Leigh, William S. Yerazunis, and Scott E. Hudson. 2004. Haptic Pen: A Tactile Feedback Stylus for Touch Screens. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Santa Fe, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jakob Leitner, James Powell, Peter Brandl, Thomas Seifried, Michael Haller, Bernard Doray, and Paul To. 2009. FLUX - A Tilting Multi-Touch and Pen Based Surface. In CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Boston, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Microsoft. 2012. Tagged Object Integration for Surface 2.0. Whitepaper. (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sandra Verena Müller, Sandy Harth, Helmut Hildebrandt, and Thomas F. Münte. 2006. Evidenzbasierte Therapie bei exekutiver Dysfunktion. Fortschritte der Neurologie. Psychiatrie 74, 1 (2006), 10--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sandra Verena Müller, Sandy Harth, and Ulrike Klaue. 2008. "Dann mache ich mir einen Plan". Arbeitsmaterialien zum planerischen Denken. Verlag Modernes Lernen, Dortmund, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Sandra Verena Müller, Helmut Hildebrandt, and Thomas F. Münte. 2004. Kognitive Therapie bei Störungen der Exekutivfunktionen: Ein Therapiemanual. Hogrefe Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sandra Verena Müller and Thomas F. Münte. 2009. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Chapter Störung von Exekutivfunktionen, 480--499.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Yongqiang Qin, Chun Yu, Hao Jiang, Chenjun Wu, and Yuanchun Shi. 2010. pPen: Enabling Authenticated Pen and Touch Interaction on Tabletop Surfaces. In Proc. of the ACM Int. Conf. on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. Saarbrücken, Germany. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Gebhart Sammer, Iris Reuter, Katharina Hullmann, Manfred Kaps, and Dieter Vaitl. 2006. Training of Executive Functions in Parkinson's Disease. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 248, 1--2 (2006), 115--119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Verena Schweizer and Susanne Müller. 2012. Neurotraining: Therapeutische Arbeit im kognitiven Bereich mit hirngeschädigten Erwachsenen. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Andrea Serino, Elisa Ciaramelli, Anna Di Santantonio, Susanna Malagù, Franco Servadei, and Elisabetta Làvadas. 2007. A Pilot Study for Rehabilitation of Central Executive Deficits after Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain Injury 21, 1 (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Ehud Sharlin, Yuichi Itoh, Benjamin Watson, Yoshifumi Kitamura, Steve Sutphen, and Lili Liu. 2002. Cognitive Cubes: a Tangible User Interface for Cognitive Assessment. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI02). Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 347--354. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Yves von Cramon, Gabriele Mathes-von Cramon, and Norbert Mai. 1991. Problem-Solving Deficints in Brain-Injured Patients: A Therapeutic Approach. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1, 1 (1991), 45--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Yves von Cramon, Gabriele Mathes-von Cramon, and Norbert Mai. 2007. Problem-Solving Deficits in Brain-Injured Patients: A Therapeutic Approach. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 1, 1 (2007), 45--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Peter H. Wilson, Jonathan Duckworth, Nick Mumford, Ross Eldridge, Mark Guglielmetti, Patrick Thomas, David Shum, and Heiko Rudolph. 2007. A Virtual Tabletop Workspace for the Assessment of Upper Limb Function in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR). Venice, Italy, 14--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Training of Cognitive Performance in Complex Tasks with a Tabletop-Based Rehabilitation System

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ITS '15: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive Tabletops & Surfaces
      November 2015
      522 pages
      ISBN:9781450338998
      DOI:10.1145/2817721

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 November 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      ITS '15 Paper Acceptance Rate29of122submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate119of418submissions,28%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader