skip to main content
10.1145/2818187.2818283acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmindtrekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Walkthrough and let's play: evaluating preservation methods for digital games

Published:22 September 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Heritage organizations have lately become increasingly interested in preserving digital games. Initial probing into the field of digital game preservation has shown that it faces some unique problems. Different technological preservation methods that aim to keep digital games playable in the future have been proposed, but they can only preserve the game in a playable form for future generations, not convey the ways people play games now. In order to understand the ways games are played, we need to look into ways of preserving the playing context. In this paper, I discuss two preservation candidates born within the digital game community, walkthrough texts and Let's Play videos, and evaluate their suitability for long term preservation.

References

  1. Newman, J. 2011. (Not) Playing Games: Player-Produced Walkthroughs as Archival Documents of Digital Gameplay. In The International Journal of Digital Curation Issue 2, Volume 6 | 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Hale, T. 2013. From Jackasses to Superstars: A Case for the Study of "Let's Play". Unpublished Master's Thesis. University of Roehampton, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Kuny, T. 1997. A Digital Dark Ages? Challenges in the of Electronic Prevention Information. In 63RD International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) Council and General Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Delve J., Pinchbeck D. and Bergmeyer W. 2014. Preserving Games Environments via TOTEM, KEEP and Bletchley Park. In The Preservation of Complex Objects Volume 3: Gaming Environments and Virtual Worlds.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Barwick, J., Dearnley, J. and Muir, A. 2011. Playing Games with Cultural Heritage: A Comparative Case Study Analysis of the Current Status of Digital Game Preservation. In Games and Culture, July 2011; vol. 6, 4: 373--390.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergmeyer, W. 2011. The KEEP Emulation Framework. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Semantic Digital Archives (SDA 2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Anderson, D., Delve, J., and Pinchbeck, D. 2010. Towards a workable, emulation-based preservation strategy: rationale and technical metadata. In New Review of Information Networking, 15(2), 22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. McDonough, J., Olendorf, R., Kirschenbaum, M., Kraus, K., Reside, D., Donahue, R., Phelps, A., Egert, C., Lowood, H., and Rojo, S. 2010. Preserving Virtual Worlds Final Report. Library of Congress.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Pinchbeck, D., Anderson, D. Delve, J., Alemu, G., Ciuffreda, A. and Lange, A. 2009. Emulation as a strategy for the preservation of games: the KEEP project. In Proceedings of DiGRA 2009, Brunel University, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ermi, L. and Mäyrä, F. 2005. Fundamental components of the gameplay experience: Analysing immersion. In Proceedings of Digra 2005, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Stenros, Jaakko and Waern, Annika 2011. Games as Activity: Correcting the Digital Fallacy. In Videogame Studies: Concepts, Cultures and Communication, M. Evans, Ed. Inter-Disciplinary Press, Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sköld, O. 2015. Documenting virtual world cultures: Memory-making and documentary practices in the City of Heroes community. In Journal of Documentation, Vol. 71 Iss: 2, pp. 294--316.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Sköld, O. 2013. Tracing traces: A document-centred approach to the preservation of virtual world communities. In Information research, 18(3).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. McDonough, J. and R. Olendorf 2011. Saving Second Life: Issues in Archiving a Complex, Multi-User Virtual World. In The International Journal of Digital Curation, vol. 6, no. 2 pp. 89--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Lowood, H. 2011. Memento mundi: Are virtual worlds history? In Digital media: Interdisciplinary perspectives on history, preservation, and ontology, M. Winget, and W. Aspray, Ed. (pp. 3--25). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Axelsson, B. 2014. The Poetics and Politics of the Swedish Model for Contemporary Collecting. In Museum and Society, March 2014, vol 12. no.1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Silvén, E. 2005. Dokumentation och insamling som kulturpolitisk strategi. In Kulturarvens dynamik: det institutionaliserade kulturarvets förändringar. (Tema kultur och samhälle, Linköpings universitet, 1653-0373; 2005: 2). pp. 240--249.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Consalvo, M. 2007. Cheating: Gaining advantage in videogames. Mit Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Newman, J. 2012. Best Before: Videogames, Supersession and Obsolescence. Routledge. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Sjöblom, B. 2011. Gaming interaction: Conversations and competencies in Internet cafés. Doctoral Thesis. Tema Barn, Linköpings Universitet.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Reunanen, M., Heinonen, M. and Pärssinen, M. 2013. Suomalaisen peliteollisuuden valtavirtaa ja sivupolkuja. In Pelitutkimuksen vuosikirja 2013, J. Suominen, R. Koskimaa, F. Mäyrä, P. Saarikoski, and O. Sotamaa, Ed.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Walkthrough and let's play: evaluating preservation methods for digital games

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          AcademicMindTrek '15: Proceedings of the 19th International Academic Mindtrek Conference
          September 2015
          230 pages
          ISBN:9781450339483
          DOI:10.1145/2818187

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 22 September 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          AcademicMindTrek '15 Paper Acceptance Rate33of51submissions,65%Overall Acceptance Rate110of207submissions,53%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader