skip to main content
10.1145/2838739.2838752acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Can SAL Support Self Reflection for Health and Nutrition?

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 December 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Important long-term goals for good health and wellbeing are challenging to achieve. Emerging technology offers the promise of easy data collection to help people monitor progress toward such goals. We designed SAL (simple, situated ambient logger) to help people track food eaten. It is minimalist with a core goal of making it easy for people to log progress towards goals, in particular, diet goals. We recruited ten participants who used SAL food loggers over 2 weeks. Our analysis of SAL use and interviews indicates it is usable and supports reflection on food intake. Our key contributions are insights into the potential of, and future directions of SAL loggers.

References

  1. Andrew, A. H., G. Borriello and J. Fogarty. Simplifying mobile phone food diaries: design and evaluation of a food index-based nutrition diary. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Årsand, E., N. Tatara and G. Hartvigsen. Mobile phone-based self-management tools for type 2 diabetes: the few touch application. Journal of diabetes science and technology 4, 2 (2010), 328--336.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian Health Survey: Nutrition First Results---Foods and Nutrients, 2011--12. Cat No 4364.0. 55.007, (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 50, 2 (1991), 248--287.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bangor, A., P. Kortum and J. Miller. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of usability studies 4, 3 (2009), 114--123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Consolvo, S., P. Klasnja, D. W. McDonald, D. Avrahami, J. Froehlich, L. LeGrand, R. Libby, K. Mosher and J. A. Landay. Flowers or a robot army?: encouraging awareness & activity with personal, mobile displays. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing, ACM (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cordeiro, F., E. Bales, E. Cherry and J. Fogarty. Rethinking the Mobile Food Journal: Exploring Opportunities for Lightweight Photo-Based Capture. Chi 2015 (2015). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cordeiro, F., D. A. Epstein, E. Thomaz, E. Bales, A. K. Jagannathan, G. D. Abowd and J. Fogarty. Barriers and Negative Nudges: Exploring Challenges in Food Journaling. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2015), 1159--1162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Eckel, R. H., J. M. Jakicic, J. D. Ard, J. M. de Jesus, N. H. Miller, V. S. Hubbard, I. M. Lee, A. H. Lichtenstein, C. M. Loria and B. E. Millen. 2013 AHA/ACC guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 63, 25_PA (2014), 2960--2984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Gan, K. O. and M. Allman-Farinelli. A scientific audit of smartphone applications for the management of obesity. Australian and New Zealand journal of public health 35, 3 (2011), 293--294.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hebden, L., A. Cook, H. P. van der Ploeg and M. Allman-Farinelli. Development of smartphone applications for nutrition and physical activity behavior change. JMIR research protocols 1, 2 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Heffernan, K. J., S. Chang, S. T. Maclean, E. T. Callegari, S. M. Garland, N. Reavley, G. Varigos and J. D. Wark. The potential of eHealth Apps to Support Targeted Complex Health Messages. Journal of General Practice (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ishii, H., C. Wisneski, S. Brave, A. Dahley, M. Gorbet, B. Ullmer and P. Yarin. ambientROOM: integrating ambient media with architectural space. CHI 98 Cconference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (1998). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jafarinaimi, N., J. Forlizzi, A. Hurst and J. Zimmerman. Breakaway: an ambient display designed to change human behavior. CHI'05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lally, P., C. H. M. Van Jaarsveld, H. W. W. Potts and J. Wardle. How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. European Journal of Social Psychology 40, 6 (2010), 998--1009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Locke, E. A. and G. P. Latham (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American psychologist 57, 9 (2002), 705.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mankoff, J., A. K. Dey, G. Hsieh, J. Kientz, S. Lederer and M. Ames. Heuristic evaluation of ambient displays. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Mattila, E., J. Parkka, M. Hermersdorf, J. Kaasinen, J. Vainio, K. Samposalo, J. Merilahti, J. Kolari, M. Kulju and R. Lappalainen. Mobile diary for wellness management---results on usage and usability in two user studies. Information Technology in Biomedicine, IEEE Transactions on 12, 4 (2008), 501--512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Müller, H., A. Kazakova, M. Pielot, W. Heuten and S. Boll. Ambient timer--unobtrusively reminding users of upcoming tasks with ambient light. Human-Computer Interaction--INTERACT 2013 (2013), Springer: 211--228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Munson, S. A. and S. Consolvo. Exploring goal-setting, rewards, self-monitoring, and sharing to motivate physical activity. Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), 2012 6th International Conference on, IEEE (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Murru, E. C. and K. A. Martin Ginis. Imagining the possibilities: The effects of a possible selves intervention on self-regulatory efficacy and exercise behavior. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology 32, 4 (2010), 537.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. NHMRC, National Health and Medical Research Council, Australien Dietery Guidelines. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council, (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Nielsen, J. Heuristic evaluation. Usability inspection methods 17, 1 (1994), 25--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Pousman, Z. and J. Stasko. A taxonomy of ambient information systems: four patterns of design. Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, ACM (2006), 67--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Prante, T., C. Röcker, N. Streitz, R. Stenzel, C. Magerkurth, D. Van Alphen and D. Plewe. Hello. wall--beyond ambient displays. Adjunct Proceedings of Ubicomp (2003), 277--278.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Purpura, S., V. Schwanda, K. Williams, W. Stubler and P. Sengers. Fit4life: the design of a persuasive technology promoting healthy behavior and ideal weight. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2011), 423--432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Resnicow, K., E. Odom, T. Wang, W. N. Dudley, D. Mitchell, R. Vaughan, A. Jackson and T. Baranowski. Validation of three food frequency questionnaires and 24-hour recalls with serum carotenoid levels in a sample of African-American adults. American Journal of Epidemiology 152, 11 (2000), 1072--1080.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Shneiderman, B. The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. Visual Languages, 1996. Proceedings, IEEE Symposium on, IEEE (1996). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Stone, A. A., S. Shiffman, J. E. Schwartz, J. E. Broderick and M. R. Hufford. Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. Controlled clinical trials 24, 2 (2003), 182--199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. USDA, Dietary guidelines for Americans, 2010, US Government Printing Office Washington, DC; U. S. Department of Agriculture and U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Yekeh, F., J. Kay, L. M. Tang and B. Kummerfeld. Formative studies of SAL, simple situated ambient loggers. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, ACM (2015), 1009--1014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Zepeda, L. and D. Deal. Think before you eat: photographic food diaries as intervention tools to change dietary decision making and attitudes. International Journal of Consumer Studies 32, 6 (2008), 692--698.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Zimmerman, B. J. A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of educational psychology 81, 3 (1989), 329.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Can SAL Support Self Reflection for Health and Nutrition?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      OzCHI '15: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction
      December 2015
      691 pages
      ISBN:9781450336734
      DOI:10.1145/2838739

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 December 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      OzCHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate47of97submissions,48%Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader