skip to main content
10.1145/2851581.2892360acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Towards Computer Assisted Crowd Aware Architectural Design

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a preliminary exploration of an architectural optimization process towards a computational tool for designing environments (e.g., building floor plans). Using dynamic crowd simulators we derive the fitness of architectural layouts. The results of the simulation are used to provide feedback to a user in terms of crowd animation, aggregate statistics, and heat maps. Our approach automatically optimizes the placement of environment elements to maximize the flow of the crowd, while satisfying constraints that are imposed by the user (e.g., immovable walls or support bearing structures). We take steps towards user-in-the-loop optimization and design of an environment by applying an adaptive refinement approach to reduce the search space of the optimization. We perform a small scale user study to obtain early feedback on the performance and quality of our method in contrast with a manual approach.

References

  1. Alban Bassuet, Dave Rife, and Luca Dellatorre. 2014. Computational and Optimization Design in Geometric Acoustics. Building Acoustics 21, 1 (2014), 75-86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Marsha J Berger and Phillip Colella. 1989. Local adaptive mesh refinement for shock hydrodynamics. Journal of computational Physics 82, 1 (1989), 64-84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Glen Berseth, Mubbasir Kapadia, Brandon Haworth, and Petros Faloutsos. 2014. SteerFit: Automated Parameter Fitting for Steering Algorithms. In ACM SIGGRAPH/EG SCA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Philippe Block, Jan Knippers, Niloy J Mitra, and Wenping Wang. 2014. Advances in Architectural Geometry 2014. (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Luisa Gama Caldas and Leslie K Norford. 2002. A design optimization tool based on a genetic algorithm. Automation in construction 11, 2 (2002), 173-184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Juliana Felkner, Eleni Chatzi, and Toni Kotnik. 2013. Interactive particle swarm optimization for the architectural design of truss structures. In Computational Intelligence for Engineering Solutions (CIES), 2013 IEEE Symposium on. IEEE, 15-22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Stephen J Guy, Jur van den Berg, Wenxi Liu, Rynson Lau, Ming C Lin, and Dinesh Manocha. 2012. A statistical similarity measure for aggregate crowd dynamics. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 31, 6 (2012), 190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Brandon Haworth, Muhammad Usman, Glen Berseth, Mubbasir Kapadia, and Petros Faloutsos. 2015. Evaluating and Optimizing Level of Service for Crowd Evacuations. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Motion in Games (MIG '15). ACM, 91-96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dirk Helbing, Illes Farkas, and Tamas Vicsek. 2000. Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 407, 6803 (2000), 487-490.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Li Jiang, Jingyu Li, Chao Shen, Sicong Yang, and Zhangang Han. 2014. Obstacle optimization for panic flow-reducing the tangential momentum increases the escape speed. PloS one 9, 12 (2014), e115463.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. A Johansson and D Helbing. 2007. Pedestrian flow optimization with a genetic algorithm based on boolean grids. In Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics 2005. Springer, 267-272.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jeremy Michalek and Panos Papalambros. 2002. Interactive design optimization of architectural layouts. Engineering Optimization 34, 5 (2002), 485-501.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Nuria Pelechano, Jan M. Allbeck, and Norman I. Badler. 2008. Virtual Crowds: Methods, Simulation, and Control. Morgan & Claypool Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Julien Pettré, Jan Ondrej, Anne-Hélène Olivier, Armel Cretual, and Stéphane Donikian. 2009. Experiment-based Modeling, Simulation and Validation of Interactions Between Virtual Walkers. In ACM SIGGRAPH/EG SCA. 189-198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Helmut Pottmann, Michael Eigensatz, Amir Vaxman, and Johannes Wallner. 2014. Architectural geometry. Computers & Graphics (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Craig W Reynolds. 1999. Steering behaviors for autonomous characters. In Game developers conference. 763-782.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Xing Shi and Wenjie Yang. 2013. Performance-driven architectural design and optimization technique from a perspective of architects. Automation in Construction 32 (2013), 125-135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Shawn Singh, Mubbasir Kapadia, Billy Hewlett, Glenn Reinman, and Petros Faloutsos. 2011. A modular framework for adaptive agent-based steering. In ACM I3D. 141-150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Daniel Thalmann and Soraia Raupp Musse. 2013. Crowd Simulation, Second Edition. Springer. I-XV, 1-296 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Michela Turrin, Peter von Buelow, and Rudi Stouffs. 2011. Design explorations of performance driven geometry in architectural design using parametric modeling and genetic algorithms. Advanced Engineering Informatics 25, 4 (2011), 656-675. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jur van den Berg, Stephen J. Guy, Ming Lin, and Dinesh Manocha. 2011. Reciprocal n-Body Collision Avoidance. In Robotics Research. Vol. 70. 3-19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. David Wolinski, Stephen Guy, Anne-Helene Olivier, Ming Lin, Dinesh Manocha, and Julien Pettré. 2014. Parameter Estimation and Comparative Evaluation of Crowd Simulations. Computer Graphics Forum 33, 2 (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Hwang Yi and Yun Kyu Yi. 2014. Performance Based Architectural Design Optimization: Automated 3D Space Layout Using Simulated Annealing. In ASHRAE/IBPSA-USA Building Simulation Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Towards Computer Assisted Crowd Aware Architectural Design

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            May 2016
            3954 pages
            ISBN:9781450340823
            DOI:10.1145/2851581

            Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 7 May 2016

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • abstract

            Acceptance Rates

            CHI EA '16 Paper Acceptance Rate1,000of5,000submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

            Upcoming Conference

            CHI '24
            CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            May 11 - 16, 2024
            Honolulu , HI , USA

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader