skip to main content
research-article

Measurements and Analysis of a Major Adult Video Portal

Published: 28 January 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Today, the Internet is a large multimedia delivery infrastructure, with websites such as YouTube appearing at the top of most measurement studies. However, most traffic studies have ignored an important domain: adult multimedia distribution. Whereas, traditionally, such services were provided primarily via bespoke websites, recently these have converged towards what is known as “Porn 2.0”. These services allow users to upload, view, rate, and comment on videos for free (much like YouTube). Despite their scale, we still lack even a basic understanding of their operation. This article addresses this gap by performing a large-scale study of one of the most popular Porn 2.0 websites: YouPorn. Our measurements reveal a global delivery infrastructure that we have repeatedly crawled to collect statistics (on 183k videos). We use this data to characterise the corpus, as well as to inspect popularity trends and how they relate to other features, for example, categories and ratings. To explore our discoveries further, we use a small-scale user study, highlighting key system implications.

References

[1]
Henrik Abrahamsson and Mattias Nordmark. 2012. Program popularity and viewer behaviour in a large TV-on-demand system. In Proceedings of IMC. ACM, New York, NY, 199--210.
[2]
Alexa. 2014. Alexa Website Rankings. http://www.alexa.com/. (2014).
[3]
Sebastian Anthony. 2012. Just How Big are Porn Sites? Retrieved from http://www.extremetech.com/computing/123929-just-how-big-are-porn-sites.
[4]
John G. Apostolopoulos, Wai-tian Tan, and Susie J. Wee. 2002. Video Streaming: Concepts, Algorithms, and Systems. Report HPL-2002-260. HP Laboratories.
[5]
Feona Attwood. 2010. Porn.com: Making Sense of Online Pornography. Vol. 48. Peter Lang.
[6]
Youmna Borghol, Sebastien Ardon, Niklas Carlsson, Derek Eager, and Anirban Mahanti. 2012. The untold story of the clones: Content-agnostic factors that impact YouTube video popularity. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 1186--1194.
[7]
Andrew Brampton, Andrew MacQuire, Michael Fry, Idris A. Rai, Nicholas J. P. Race, and Laurent Mathy. 2009. Characterising and exploiting workloads of highly interactive video-on-demand. Multimedia Systems 15, 1 (2009), 3--17.
[8]
Matt Calder, Xun Fan, Zi Hu, Ethan Katz-Bassett, John Heidemann, and Ramesh Govindan. 2013. Mapping the expansion of Google’s serving infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference. ACM, 313--326.
[9]
Jason S. Carroll, Laura M. Padilla-Walker, Larry J. Nelson, Chad D. Olson, Carolyn McNamara Barry, and Stephanie D. Madsen. 2008. Generation XXX pornography acceptance and use among emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Research 23, 1 (2008), 6--30.
[10]
Meeyoung Cha, Haewoon Kwak, Pablo Rodriguez, Yong-Yeol Ahn, and Sue Moon. 2009. Analyzing the video popularity characteristics of large-scale user generated content systems. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 17, 5 (2009), 1357--1370.
[11]
Meeyoung Cha, Pablo Rodriguez, Jon Crowcroft, Sue Moon, and Xavier Amatriain. 2008. Watching television over an IP network. In Proceedings of IMC. ACM, 71--84.
[12]
Gloria Chatzopoulou, Cheng Sheng, and Michalis Faloutsos. 2010. A first step towards understanding popularity in YouTube. In INFOCOM Workshops. IEEE, 1--6.
[13]
Xu Cheng, Cameron Dale, and Jiangchuan Liu. 2008. Statistics and social network of YouTube videos. In Proceedings of the16th International Workshop on Quality of Service (IWQoS’08). IEEE, 229--238.
[14]
Cisco. 2015. Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Methodology, 2014--2019. (May 2015).
[15]
comSCORE. 2014. Online Video Rankings. Retrieved from http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press-Releases/2014/2/comScore-Releases-January-2014-US-Online-Video-Rankings.
[16]
Al Cooper. 1998. Sexuality and the Internet: Surfing into the new millennium. CyberPsychology & Behavior 1, 2 (January 1998), 187--193.
[17]
Jonathan Coopersmith. 2006. Does your mother know what you really do? The changing nature and image of computer-based pornography. History and Technology 22, 1 (2006), 1--25.
[18]
Riley Crane and Didier Sornette. 2008. Robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 41 (2008), 15649--15653.
[19]
Sally Jo Cunningham and David M. Nichols. 2008. How people find videos. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM, 201--210.
[20]
Kristian Daneback, Anna Sevcikova, Sven-Axel Månsson, and Michael W. Ross. 2012. Outcomes of using the Internet for sexual purposes: Fulfilment of sexual desires. Sexual Health 10, 1 (Dec. 2012), 26--31.
[21]
Gail Dines. 2010. Pornland: How Porn Has Hijacked Our Sexuality. Beacon Press.
[22]
Yehia Elkhatib, Rebecca Killick, Mu Mu, and Nicholas Race. 2014. Just browsing? Understanding user journeys in online TV. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Multimedia. 965--968.
[23]
Lei Guo, Enhua Tan, Songqing Chen, Zhen Xiao, and Xiaodong Zhang. 2008. The stretched exponential distribution of internet media access patterns. In Proceedings of PODC. ACM, 283--294.
[24]
Xiaojun Hei, Chao Liang, Jian Liang, Yong Liu, and Keith W. Ross. 2007. A measurement study of a large-scale P2P IPTV system. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 9, 8 (2007), 1672--1687.
[25]
Weiming Hu, Ou Wu, Zhouyao Chen, Zhouyu Fu, and Steve Maybank. 2007. Recognition of pornographic web pages by classifying texts and images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 29, 6 (June 2007), 1019--1034.
[26]
Ryan Hurley, Swagatika Prusty, Hamed Soroush, Robert J. Walls, Jeannie Albrecht, Emmanuel Cecchet, Brian Neil Levine, Marc Liberatore, Brian Lynn, and Janis Wolak. 2013. Measurement and analysis of child pornography trafficking on P2P networks. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference.
[27]
Anna Kupka. 2010. YouTube Reaches 4 Billion Video Views Per Day. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/annakupka/2012/01/24/youtube-reaches-4-billion-video-views-per-day/.
[28]
Patricia G. Lange. 2007. Commenting on comments: Investigating responses to antagonism on YouTube. In Annual Conference of the Society for Applied Anthropology (2007).
[29]
Lassi A. Liikkanen and Antti Salovaara. 2015. Music on YouTube: User engagement with traditional, user-appropriated and derivative videos. Computers in Human Behavior 50 (2015), 108--124.
[30]
Michael D. Mehta and Dwaine Plaza. 1997. Content analysis of pornographic images available on the Internet. The Information Society 13, 2 (1997), 153--161.
[31]
Gianfranco Nencioni, Nishanth Sastry, Gareth Tyson, Vijay Badrinarayanan, Dmytro Karamshuk, Jigna Chandaria, and Jon Crowcroft. 2015. SCORE: Exploiting global broadcasts to create offline personal channels for on-demand access. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (2015). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=7210228.
[32]
Ogi Ogas and Sai Gaddam. 2011. A Billion Wicked Thoughts: What the World’s Largest Experiment Reveals About Human Desire. Dutton.
[33]
Henrique Pinto, Jussara M. Almeida, and Marcos A. Gonçalves. 2013. Using early view patterns to predict the popularity of YouTube videos. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 365--374.
[34]
Nishanth Sastry. 2012. How to tell head from tail in user-generated content corpora. In Proceedings of the Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
[35]
Michael Schuhmacher, Cäcilia Zirn, and Johanna Völker. 2013. Exploring YouPorn categories, tags, and nicknames for pleasant recommendations. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Search and Exploration of X-Rated Information (SEXI 2013). 27--28.
[36]
Hendrik Schulze and Klaus Mochalski. 2009. Internet Study 2007--2009. Retrieved from http://www.ipoque.com/resources/internet-studies/.
[37]
Stefan Siersdorfer, Sergiu Chelaru, Wolfgang Nejdl, and Jose San Pedro. 2010. How useful are your comments?: Analyzing and predicting YouTube comments and comment ratings. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on the World Wide Web. ACM, 891--900.
[38]
John Suler. 2004. The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 7, 3 (2004), 321--326.
[39]
Gabor Szabo and Bernardo A. Huberman. 2010. Predicting the popularity of online content. Communications of the ACM 53, 8 (Aug. 2010), 80--88.
[40]
Mike Thelwall, Pardeep Sud, and Farida Vis. 2012. Commenting on YouTube videos: From Guatemalan rock to el big bang. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63, 3 (2012), 616--629.
[41]
Gareth Tyson, Yehia Elkhatib, Nishanth Sastry, and Steve Uhlig. 2013. Demystifying porn 2.0: A look into a major adult video streaming website. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference.
[42]
Gareth Tyson, Yehia Elkhatib, Nishanth Sastry, and Steve Uhlig. 2015. Are people really social on porn 2.0? In Proceedings of the 9th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.
[43]
Mirjam Wattenhofer, Yannet Interian, Jon Vaver, and Tom Broxton. 2010. Catching a viral video. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Social Interaction Analysis and Service Providers (SIASP’10), colocated with ICDM.
[44]
Gilbert Wondracek, Thorsten Holz, Christian Platzer, Engin Kirda, and Christopher Kruegel. 2010. Is the Internet for porn? An insight into the online adult industry. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Economics of Information Security.
[45]
YouPorn. 2012a. YouPorn 2012: BIG Numbers, HARD Facts. Retrieved from http://blog.youporn.com/youporn-2012-big-numbers-hard-facts/.
[46]
YouPorn. 2012b. Youporn.com is now a 100% Redis Site. Retrieved from https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/redis-db/d4QcWV0p-YM.
[47]
YouPorn. 2014. YouPorn. Retrieved from http://www.youporn.com.
[48]
YouPorn. 2015. YouPorn Content Partnership. Retrieved from http://www.youporn.com/contentpartnerprogram/makemoney/.
[49]
YouTube. 2015. YouTube Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/yt/press/en-GB/statistics.html.
[50]
Hongliang Yu, Dongdong Zheng, Ben Y. Zhao, and Weimin Zheng. 2006. Understanding user behavior in large-scale video-on-demand systems. In ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, Vol. 40. ACM, 333--344.
[51]
Michael Zink, Kyoungwon Suh, Yu Gu, and Jim Kurose. 2009. Characteristics of YouTube network traffic at a campus network—Measurements, models, and implications. Computer Networks 53, 4 (2009), 501--514.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Streaming women: Hayu, Passionflix and gendered demographics in subscription video-on-demandConvergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies10.1177/13548565241264004Online publication date: 23-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Cashing in on Contacts: Characterizing the OnlyFans EcosystemProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202310.1145/3543507.3583210(2645-2654)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2023
  • (2022)Node-Imbalance Learning on Heterogeneous Graph for Pirated Video Website Detection2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD)10.1109/CSCWD54268.2022.9776224(834-840)Online publication date: 4-May-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications
ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications  Volume 12, Issue 2
March 2016
224 pages
ISSN:1551-6857
EISSN:1551-6865
DOI:10.1145/2837041
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 January 2016
Accepted: 01 October 2015
Revised: 01 October 2015
Received: 01 April 2015
Published in TOMM Volume 12, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Adult video content
  2. Porn 2.0
  3. media streaming
  4. user behaviour

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 09 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Streaming women: Hayu, Passionflix and gendered demographics in subscription video-on-demandConvergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies10.1177/13548565241264004Online publication date: 23-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Cashing in on Contacts: Characterizing the OnlyFans EcosystemProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202310.1145/3543507.3583210(2645-2654)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2023
  • (2022)Node-Imbalance Learning on Heterogeneous Graph for Pirated Video Website Detection2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD)10.1109/CSCWD54268.2022.9776224(834-840)Online publication date: 4-May-2022
  • (2021)Characterisation and comparative analysis of thematic video portalsTechnology in Society10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.10169067(101690)Online publication date: Nov-2021
  • (2021)Understanding web pornography usage from traffic analysisComputer Networks10.1016/j.comnet.2021.107909189(107909)Online publication date: Apr-2021
  • (2020)A Non-Stationary Bandit-Learning Approach to Energy-Efficient Femto-Caching With Rateless-Coded TransmissionIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications10.1109/TWC.2020.298917919:7(5040-5056)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2020
  • (2020)A Pornographic Images Recognition Model based on Deep One-Class Classification With Visual Attention MechanismIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2020.29887368(122709-122721)Online publication date: 2020
  • (2019)Comparative Analysis of Adult Video Streaming Services: Characteristics and Workload2019 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA)10.23919/TMA.2019.8784688(49-56)Online publication date: Jun-2019
  • (2019)Measurement and analysis of an adult video streaming serviceProceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining10.1145/3341161.3342940(489-492)Online publication date: 27-Aug-2019
  • (2019)Characterizing Web Pornography Consumption from Passive MeasurementsPassive and Active Measurement10.1007/978-3-030-15986-3_20(304-316)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2019
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media