skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858180acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

miniStudio: Designers' Tool for Prototyping Ubicomp Space with Interactive Miniature

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recently, it has become common for designers to deal with complex and large-scale ubicomp or IoT spaces. Designers without technical implementation skills have difficulties in prototyping such spaces, especially in the early phases of design. We present miniStudio, a designers' tool for prototyping ubicomp space with proxemic interactions. It is built on designers' existing software and modeling materials (Photoshop, Lego, and paper). Interactions can be defined in Photoshop based on five spatial relations: location, distance, motion, orientation, and custom. Projection-based augmented reality was applied to miniatures in order to enable tangible interactions and dynamic representations. Hidden marker stickers and a camera-projector system enable the unobtrusive integration of digital images on the physical miniature. Through the user study with 12 designers and researchers in the ubicomp field, we found that miniStudio supported rapid prototyping of large and complex ideas with multiple connected components. Based on the tool development and the study, we discuss the implications for prototyping ubicomp environments in the early phase of the design.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn0837-file3.mp4

mp4

87.7 MB

p213-kim.mp4

mp4

252.6 MB

References

  1. John J Barton and Vikram Vijayaraghavan. 2003. UBIWISE, a simulator for ubiquitous computing systems design. Technical report HPL-2003-93 (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Eva Brandt and Camilla Grunnet. 2000. Evoking the future: Drama and props in user centered design. In Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference (PDC '00). 11--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Marion Buchenau and Jane Fulton Suri. 2000. Experience Prototyping. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (DIS '00). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 424--433. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/347642.347802 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Colin Burns, Eric Dishman, William Verplank, and Bud Lassiter. 1994. Actors, Hairdos & Videotape Informance Design. In Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '94). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 119--120. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/259963.260102 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bill Buxton. 2007. Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Xiang Cao and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2006. Interacting with Dynamically Defined Information Spaces Using a Handheld Projector and a Pen. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '06). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 225--234. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1166253.1166289 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Stefan Carmien, Melissa Dawe, Gerhard Fischer, Andrew Gorman, Anja Kintsch, and James F. Sullivan, JR. 2005. Socio-technical Environments Supporting People with Cognitive Disabilities Using Public Transportation. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 12, 2 (June 2005), 233--262. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1067860.1067865 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Peter Dalsgaard and Kim Halskov. 2012. Tangible 3D Tabletops: Combining Tangible Tabletop Interaction and 3D Projection. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design (NordiCHI '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 109--118. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2399016.2399033 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. James Fogarty, Jodi Forlizzi, and Scott E. Hudson. 2002. Specifying Behavior and Semantic Meaning in an Unmodified Layered Drawing Package. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '02). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 61--70. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/571985.571995 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Saul Greenberg, Nicolai Marquardt, Till Ballendat, Rob Diaz-Marino, and Miaosen Wang. 2011. Proxemic Interactions: The New Ubicomp- interactions 18, 1 (Jan. 2011), 42--50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1897239.1897250 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Björn Hartmann, Scott R. Klemmer, Michael Bernstein, Leith Abdulla, Brandon Burr, Avi Robinson-Mosher, and Jennifer Gee. 2006. Reflective Physical Prototyping Through Integrated Design, Test, and Analysis. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '06). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 299--308. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1166253.1166300 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. David Holman and Hrvoje Benko. 2011. SketchSpace: Designing Interactive Behaviors with Passive Materials. In CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '11). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1987--1992. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979867 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Yosuke Horiuchi, Tomoo Inoue, and Ken-ichi Okada. 2012. Virtual Stage Linked with a Physical Miniature Stage to Support Multiple Users in Planning Theatrical Productions. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 109--118. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2166966.2166989 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Takuma Hosokawa, Yasuhiko Takeda, Norio Shioiri, Mitsunori Hirano, and Kazuhiko Tanaka. 2008. Tangible Design Support System Using RFID Technology. In Proceedings of the 2Nd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI '08). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 75--78. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1347390.1347408 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Yasuaki Kakehi, Junichi Yamaoka, Daisuke Akatsuka, and Takeshi Naemura. 2009. Tablescape Animation: A Support System for Making Animations Using Tabletop Physical Objects. In SIGGRAPH 2009: Talks (SIGGRAPH '09). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 70, 1 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1597990.1598060 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Satoshi Kanai, Soh Horiuchi, Yukiaki Kikuta, Akihiko Yokoyama, and Yoshiyuki Shiroma. 2007. An integrated environment for testing and assessing the usability of information appliances using digital and physical mock-ups. (2007), 478--487. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Scott R. Klemmer, Jack Li, James Lin, and James A. Landay. 2004. Papier-Mache: Toolkit Support for Tangible Input. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '04). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 399--406. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/985692.985743 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Woohun Lee and Jun Park. 2005. Augmented Foam: A Tangible Augmented Reality for Product Design. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR '05). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 106--109. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2005.16 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Yang Li, Jason I. Hong, and James A. Landay. 2004. Topiary: A Tool for Prototyping Location-enhanced Applications. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '04). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 217--226. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1029632.1029671 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Blair MacIntyre, Maribeth Gandy, Steven Dow, and Jay David Bolter. 2004. DART: A Toolkit for Rapid Design Exploration of Augmented Reality Experiences. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '04). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 197--206. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1029632.1029669 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Michael R. Marner, Bruce H. Thomas, and Christian Sandor. 2009. Physical-virtual Tools for Spatial Augmented Reality User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2009 8th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR '09). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 205--206. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2009.5336458 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Nicolai Marquardt, Robert Diaz-Marino, Sebastian Boring, and Saul Greenberg. 2011. The Proximity Toolkit: Prototyping Proxemic Interactions in Ubiquitous Computing Ecologies. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '11). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 315--326. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2047196.2047238 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Yasuto Nakanishi. 2012. Virtual Prototyping Using Miniature Model and Visualization for Interactive Public Displays. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 458--467. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318024 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Tek-Jin Nam. 2005. Sketch-based Rapid Prototyping Platform for Hardware-software Integrated Interactive Products. In CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '05). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1689--1692. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1056808.1056998 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Tek-Jin Nam and Woohun Lee. 2003. Integrating Hardware and Software: Augmented Reality Based Prototyping Method for Digital Products. In CHI '03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '03). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 956--957. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/765891.766092 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Hiroshi Nishikawa, Shinya Yamamoto, Morihiko Tamai, Kouji Nishigaki, Tomoya Kitani, Naoki Shibata, Keiichi Yasumoto, and Minoru Ito. 2006. UbiREAL: Realistic Smartspace Simulator for Systematic Testing. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp'06). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 459--476. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11853565_27 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Matthias Rauterberg, Morten Fjeld, Helmut Krueger, Martin Bichsel, Uwe Leonhardt, and Markus Meier. 1998. BUILD-IT: A Planning Tool for Construction and Design. In CHI 98 Cconference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '98). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 177--178. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/286498.286657 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Daniel Saakes and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2009. A tangible design tool for sketching materials in products. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 23 (8 2009), 275--287. Issue Special Issue 03. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0890060409000249 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Donald A Schön. 1984. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action. Basic Books, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Fabian Segelström and Stefan Holmlid. 2011. Service design visualisations meet service theory: strengths, weaknesses and perspectives. In Proceedings of Art & Science of Service, San Jose, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. John Underkoffier and Hiroshi Ishii. 1999. Urp: A Luminous-tangible Workbench for Urban Planning and Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '99). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 386--393. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/302979.303114 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Jouke Verlinden. 2014. Developing an Interactive Augmented Prototyping Methodology to Support Design Reviews. Ph.D. Dissertation. Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Jouke Verlinden and Imre Horváth. 2008. Enabling interactive augmented prototyping by a portable hardware and a plug-in-based software architecture. STROJNISKI VESTNIK - Journal of Mechanical Engineering 54, 6 (2008), 458--470.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Mark Weiser. 1991. The computer for the 21st century. Scientific american 265, 3 (1991), 94--104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Alexander Wiethoff, Thomas Bauer, and Sven Gehring. 2014. Investigating Multi-user Interactions on Interactive Media Facades. In Proceedings of the 2Nd Media Architecture Biennale Conference: World Cities (MAB '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 92--100. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2682884.2682890 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Karl D. D. Willis, Takaaki Shiratori, and Moshe Mahler. 2013. HideOut: Mobile Projector Interaction with Tangible Objects and Surfaces. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 331--338. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2460625.2460682 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Robert Xiao, Chris Harrison, and Scott E. Hudson. 2013. WorldKit: Rapid and Easy Creation of Ad-hoc Interactive Applications on Everyday Surfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 879--888. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466113 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Ji-Dong Yim and Tek-Jin Nam. 2004. Developing Tangible Interaction and Augmented Reality in Director. In CHI '04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '04). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1541--1541. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/985921.986117 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. miniStudio: Designers' Tool for Prototyping Ubicomp Space with Interactive Miniature

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader