skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858342acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access
Honorable Mention

LGBT Parents and Social Media: Advocacy, Privacy, and Disclosure during Shifting Social Movements

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Increasing numbers of American parents identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT). Shifting social movements are beginning to achieve greater recognition for LGBT parents and more rights for their families; however, LGBT parents still experience stigma and judgment in a variety of social contexts. We interviewed 28 LGBT parents to investigate how they navigate their online environments in light of these societal shifts. We find that 1) LGBT parents use social media sites to detect disapproval and identify allies within their social networks; 2) LGBT parents become what we call incidental advocates, when everyday social media posts are perceived as advocacy work even when not intended as such; and 3) for LGBT parents, privacy is a complex and collective responsibility, shared with children, partners, and families. We consider the complexities of LGBT parents' online disclosures in the context of shifting social movements and discuss the importance of supporting individual and collective privacy boundaries in these contexts.

References

  1. Gordon W. Allport. 1954. 1979. The nature of prejudice. NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Paul R. Amato. 2012. The well-being of children with gay and lesbian parents. Social Science Research 41, 4: 771--774.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Tawfiq Ammari, Priya Kumar, Cliff Lampe, and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2015. Managing Children's Online Identities: How Parents Decide what to Disclose about their Children Online. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1895--1904. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Tawfiq Ammari and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2015. Understanding and Supporting Fathers and Fatherhood on Social Media Sites. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1905--1914. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Belle Rose Ragins. 2004. Sexual orientation in the workplace: the unique work and career experiences of gay, lesbian and bisexual workers. In Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 35--120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mary Bernstein and Renate Reimann. 2001. Queer families, queer politics: Challenging culture and the state. Columbia University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Buzz Bissinger. (2015, June 30). Caitlyn Jenner: The full story. Vanity Fair.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Courtney Blackwell, Jeremy Birnholtz, and Charles Abbott. 2014. Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New Media & Society: 1461444814521595.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. danah boyd. 2012. The Politics of "Real Names." Commun. ACM 55, 8: 29--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. danah boyd. 2008. Taken out of context: American teen sociality in networked publics. ProQuest. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Rose Chapman, Rochelle Watkins, Tess Zappia, Pam Nicol, and Linda Shields. 2012. Nursing and medical students' attitude, knowledge and beliefs regarding lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender parents seeking health care for their children. Journal of Clinical Nursing 21, 7--8: 938--945.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Lisa M. Diamond and Sarah Lucas. 2004. Sexual Minority and Heterosexual Youths' Peer Relationships: Experiences, Expectations, and Implications for Well Being. Journal of Research on Adolescence 14, 3: 313--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Ron Eglash. 2004. Appropriating technology: Vernacular science and social power. University of MN Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Nicole B. Ellison, Jessica Vitak, Charles Steinfield, Rebecca Gray, and Cliff Lampe. 2011. Negotiating Privacy Concerns and Social Capital Needs in a Social Media Environment. In Privacy Online, Sabine Trepte and Leonard Reinecke (eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 19--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee B. Erickson, Pamela Wisniewski, Heng Xu, John M. Carroll, Mary Beth Rosson, and Daniel F. Perkins. 2015. The boundaries between: Parental involvement in a teen's online world. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Robin K. Fox. 2007. One of the hidden diversities in schools: Families with parents who are lesbian or gay. Childhood Education 83, 5: 277--281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Alison Gash. (2015, Mar 4). Oregon Leads the Way With Nation's First Openly Bisexual Governor. Slate.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Gary J. Gates. 2013. LGBT Parenting in the USA. eScholarship.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lorna Gibson and Vicki L. Hanson. 2013. Digital Motherhood: How Does Technology Help New Mothers' Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 313--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. William Goedel. 2015. Geosocial-networking application use in application-using gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) in Atlanta, Georgia. 143rd APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition. APHA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jaime M. Grant, Lisa Mottet, Justin Edward Tanis, Jack Harrison, Jody Herman, and Mara Keisling. 2011. Injustice at every turn: A report of the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. National Center for Transgender Equality.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Mary L. Gray. 2009. Out in the country: Youth, media, and queer visibility in rural America. NYU Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Mary L. Gray. 2009. Negotiating Identities/Queering Desires: Coming Out Online and the Remediation of the Coming-Out Story. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14, 4: 1162--1189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Oliver L. Haimson, Jed R. Brubaker, Lynn Dombrowski, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2015. Disclosure, Stress, and Support During Gender Transition on Facebook. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 1176--1190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Gregory M. Herek, John P. Capitanio, and others. 1996. "Some of my best friends": Intergroup contact, concealable stigma, and heterosexuals' attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22: 412--424.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Lynne Hillier and Lyn Harrison. 2007. Building Realities Less Limited Than Their Own: Young People Practising Same-Sex Attraction on the Internet. Sexualities 10, 1: 82--100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Lynne Hillier, Philomena Horsley, Chyloe Kurdas, and others. 2001. "It's Just Easier": The Internet as a Safety-net for Same Sex Attracted Young People. Australian Research Centre in Sex Health and Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Lynne Hillier, Kimberly J. Mitchell, and Michele L. Ybarra. 2012. The Internet As a Safety Net: Findings From a Series of Online Focus Groups With LGB and Non-LGB Young People in the USA. Journal of LGBT Youth 9, 3: 225--246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Bernie Hogan. 2012. Pseudonyms and the Rise of the Real-Name Web. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Elise Hu. (2015, May 11). The First Place In East Asia To Welcome Same-Sex Marriage. NPR.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Hilary Hutchinson, Wendy Mackay, Bo Westerlund, et al. 2003. Technology Probes: Inspiring Design for and with Families. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Konstantinos Kazakos, Elizabeth Bales, Carman Neustaedter, Svetlana Yarosh, Joseph "Jofish" Kaye, and David Kirk. 2013. Exploring the Diversity of Families: Designing Technologies for the Contemporary Family Life. CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3255--3258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Joseph G. Kosciw and Elizabeth M. Diaz. 2008. Involved, Invisible, Ignored: The Experiences of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Parents and Their Children in Our Nation's K-12 Schools. Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Genet Kozik-Rosabal. 2000. "Well We Haven't Noticed Anything Bad Going On," Said the Principal: Parents Speak about Their Gay Families and Schools. Education and Urban Society 32, 3: 368--89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Priya Kumar and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2015. The Modern Day Baby Book: Enacting Good Mothering and Stewarding Privacy on Facebook. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 1302--1312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Serena Lambert. 2005. Gay and lesbian families: What we know and where to go from here. The Family Journal 13, 1: 43--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Airi Lampinen, Vilma Lehtinen, Asko Lehmuskallio, and Sakari Tamminen. 2011. We're in It Together: Interpersonal Management of Disclosure in Social Network Services. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3217--3226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Pamela J. Lannutti. 2011. Examining Communication about Marriage Amendments: Same-Sex Couples and Their Extended Social Networks. Journal of Social Issues 67, 2: 264--281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Pamela J. Lannutti. 2013. Same-Sex Marriage and Privacy Management: Examining Couples' Communication with Family Members. Journal of Family Communication 13, 1: 60--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Nicole Legate, Richard M. Ryan, and Netta Weinstein. 2012. Is Coming Out Always a "Good Thing"? Exploring the Relations of Autonomy Support, Outness, and Wellness for Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Individuals. Social Psychological and Personality Science 3, 2: 145--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Bruce G. Link and Jo C. Phelan. 2001. Conceptualizing stigma. Annual review of Sociology: 363--385.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Daphne Lofquist, USA Bureau of the Census, and others. 2011. Same-sex couple households. US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Caitlin McLaughlin and Jessica Vitak. 2012. Norm evolution and violation on Facebook. New Media & Society 14, 2: 299--315.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Ruth McNair, Deborah Dempsey, Sarah Wise, and Amaryll Perlesz. 2002. Lesbian Parenting: Issues, Strengths and Challenges.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Ethan Mereish and V. Paul Poteat. 2015. Effects of heterosexuals' direct and extended friendships with sexual minorities on their attitudes and behaviors: intergroup anxiety and attitude strength as mediators and moderators. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 45, 3: 147--157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Jeff Merkley. 2014. Text - S.815 - 113th Congress (2013--2014): Employment Non-Discrimination Act of 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Meredith Ringel Morris. 2014. Social Networking Site Use by Mothers of Young Children. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 1272--1282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Peter Moskowitz. (2015, July 2). Why you should stop waving the rainbow flag on Facebook. The Washington Post.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Stephen Neville and Mark Henrickson. 2009. The constitution of "lavender families": a LGB perspective. Journal of Clinical Nursing 18, 6: 849--856.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Leysia Palen and Paul Dourish. 2003. Unpacking privacy for a networked world. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, 129--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Charlotte J. Patterson. 1992. Children of lesbian and gay parents. Child development 63, 5: 1025--1042.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Amaryll Perlesz, Rhonda Brown, Jo Lindsay, Ruth McNair, David De Vaus, and Marian Pitts. 2006. Family in transition: parents, children and grandparents in lesbian families give meaning to "doing family." Journal of Family Therapy 28, 2: 175--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Sandra Petronio. 2002. Boundaries of privacy. State University of NY Press, Albany, NY. /Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Sandra Petronio. 2010. Communication privacy management theory: What do we know about family privacy regulation? Journal of Family Theory & Review 2, 3: 175--196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Christopher Pullen and Margaret Cooper. 2010. LGBT identity and online new media. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Robert T. Cserni and Ilan Talmud. 2015. To Know that You Are Not Alone: The Effect of Internet Usage on LGBT Youth's Social Capital. In Communication and Information Technologies Annual. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 161--182.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Michael J. Rosenfeld. 2010. Nontraditional families and childhood progress through school. Demography 47, 3: 755--775.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Yoel Roth. 2014. Locating the "Scruff Guy": Theorizing Body and Space in Gay Geosocial Media. International Journal of Communication 8, 0: 21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Elizabeth Short, Damien W. Riggs, Amaryll Perlesz, Rhonda Brown, and Graeme Kane. 2007. Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) parented families: A literature review prepared for the Australian Psychological Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Vincent M. B. Silenzio, Paul R. Duberstein, Wan Tang, Naiji Lu, Xin Tu, and Christopher M. Homan. 2009. Connecting the invisible dots: Reaching lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents and young adults at risk for suicide through online social networks. Social Science & Medicine 69, 3: 469--474.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Changing Attitudes on Gay Marriage. (2015, July 29). Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project. Retrieved August 27, 2015 from http://www.pewforum.org/2015/07/29/graphicsslideshow-changing-attitudes-on-gay-marriage/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Mark Surman and Katherine Reilly. 2003. Appropriating the internet for social change: towards the strategic use of networked technologies by transnational civil society organizations. Social Science Research Council.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Paul Taylor. 2013. A survey of LGBT Americans: attitudes, experiences and values in changing times. Pew Research Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. David R. Thomas. 2006. A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. American Journal of Evaluation 27, 2: 237--246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Jeffrey W. Treem and Paul M. Leonardi. 2012. Social Media Use in Organizations: Exploring the Affordances of Visibility, Editability, Persistence, and Association. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Matt Vella. (2015, June 1). Twitter Bot Corrects You If You Misgender Caitlyn Jenner. Time.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Stephanie Vie. 2014. In defense of "slacktivism": The Human Rights Campaign Facebook logo as digital activism. First Monday 19, 4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Jessica Vitak, Stacy Blasiola, Eden Litt, and Sameer Patil. 2015. Balancing Audience and Privacy Tensions on Social Network Sites: Strategies of Highly Engaged Users. International Journal of Communication 9: 20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Pamela Wisniewski, Haiyan Jia, Heng Xu, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M. Carroll. 2015. Preventative vs. Reactive: How Parental Mediation Influences Teens' Social Media Privacy Behaviors. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 302--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Sarita Yardi and danah boyd. 2010. Dynamic Debates: An Analysis of Group Polarization Over Time on Twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 30, 5: 316--327.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Sarita Yardi and Amy Bruckman. 2011. Social and Technical Challenges in Parenting Teens' Social Media Use. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3237--3246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. 2015. Obergefell v. Hodges.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Same-sex Marriage Referendum. (2015, May). The Irish Times. Retrieved August 27, 2015 from http://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/marriagereferendumGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Evidence of Persistent and Pervasive Workplace Discrimination Against LGBT People: The Need for Federal Legislation Prohibiting Discrimination and Providing for Equal Employment Benefits. (2012, June). Williams Institute. Retrieved September 13, 2015 from http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/research/workplace/ llr-enda-v45--3/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Discrimination and Harassment by Law Enforcement Officers in the LGBT Community. (2015, March). Williams Institute. Retrieved September 13, 2015 from http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/research/violencecrime/discrimination-and-harassment-by-lawenforcement-officers-in-the-lgbt-community/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Discrimination Against State and Local Government LGBT Employees: An Analysis of Administrative Complaints. (2014, July). Williams Institute. Retrieved September 13, 2015 from http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/research/workplace/lgbtqpj-mallory-sears-2014/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. The Cost of the Closet and the Rewards of Inclusion. Human Rights Campaign. (2014, May). Retrieved September 13, 2015 from http://www.hrc.org/resources/entry/the-cost-of-thecloset-and-the-rewards-of-inclusionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Non-Discrimination Laws: State by State Information Map. American Civil Liberties Union. Retrieved August 27, 2015 from https://www.aclu.org/map/nondiscrimination-laws-state-state-information-mapGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Foster and Adoption Laws. (2015, Dec 23). Retrieved January 7, 2016 from http://www.lgbtmap.org/equalitymaps/foster_and_adoption_lawsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Facebook Analysis Proves Millions Worldwide Switched to HRC Red Equality Logo. (2013, Dec 10). Human Rights Campaign. Retrieved January 7, 2016 from http://www.hrc.org/blog/facebook-analysis-provesmillions-worldwide-switched-to-hrc-red-equality-loGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. 72 hours to launch Celebrate Pride. (2015, July 2). Facebook Code. Retrieved September 24, 2015 from https://code.facebook.com/posts/778505998932780/72hours-to-launch-celebrate-pride/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. LGBT Parents and Social Media: Advocacy, Privacy, and Disclosure during Shifting Social Movements

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader