skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858418acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Sensation: Measuring the Effects of a Human-to-Human Social Touch Based Controller on the Player Experience

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We observe an increasing interest on usage of full-body interaction in games. However, human-to-human social touch interaction has not been implemented as a sophisticated gaming apparatus. To address this, we designed the Sensation, a device for detecting touch patterns between players, and introduce the game, Shape Destroy, which is a collaborative game designed to be played with social touch. To understand if usage of social touch has a meaningful contribution to the overall player experience in collaborative games we conducted a user study with 30 participants. Participants played the same game using i) the Sensation and ii) a gamepad, and completed a set of questionnaires aimed at measuring the immersion levels. As a result, the collected data and our observations indicated an increase in general, shared, ludic and affective involvement with significant differences. Thus, human-to-human touch can be considered a promising control method for collaborative physical games.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn1902.mp4

mp4

19.5 MB

References

  1. N Bianchi-Berthouze, Wk Whan, and D Patel. 2007. Does body movement engage you more in digital game play? And why? 31-32. http://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--540--74889--2_10Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Staffan Björk, Jennica Falk, Rebecca Hansson, and Peter Ljungstrand. 2001. Pirates'! Using the Physical World as a Game Board. Proceedings of Interact 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Blizzard Entertainment Inc. 2015. World of Warcraft. Retrieved from http://eu.battle.net/wow/en/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Emily Brown and Paul Cairns. 2004. A grounded investigation of game immersion. Extended abstracts of the 2004 conference on Human factors and computing systems CHI '04, 1297. http://doi.org/10.1145/985921.986048 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Oğuz Turan Buruk and Oğuzhan Özcan. 2014. DubTouch: exploring human to human touch interaction for gaming in double sided displays. Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 333-342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Gordon Calleja. 2011. In-game: From Immersion to Incorporation (Google eBook). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Adrian David Cheok, Siew Wan Fong, Kok Hwee Goh, Xubo Yang, and Wei Liu. 2003. Human Pacman: A Mobile Entertainment System with Ubiquitous Computing and. Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on Network and system support for games NETGAMES 03 8, 209-224. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-004-0267-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Laura Ermi and Frans Mäyrä. 2005. Fundamental Components of the Gameplay Experience: Analysing Immersion. DiGRA 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jan B. F. van Erp and Alexander Toet. 2015. Social Touch in Human-Computer Interaction. Frontiers in Digital Humanities 2, May, 1-14. http://doi.org/10.3389/fdigh.2015.00002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jayden Garner, Gavin Wood, Sandra Danilovic, Jessica Hammer, and Florian Floyd Mueller. intangle: Exploring Interpersonal Bodily Interactions through Sharing Controllers. 413-414.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jayden Garner, Gavin Wood, Sebastiaan Pijnappel, Martin Murer, and Florian Floyd Mueller. 2013. Combining moving bodies with digital elements. Proceedings of The 9th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment Matters of Life and Death IE '13, 1-10. http://doi.org/10.1145/2513002.2513014 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Anneke De Graaf, Hans Hoeken, José Sanders, and Hans Beentjes. 2009. The role of dimensions of narrative engagement in narrative persuasion. Communications 34, 4, 385-405. http://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.024Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Antal Haans and Wijnand IJsselsteijn. 2006. Mediated social touch: A review of current research and future directions. Virtual Reality 9, 149-159. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-005-0014--2 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Laura Herrewijn, Gordon Calleja, and Karolien Poels. 2013. The Relationship between Player Involvement and Immersion: an Experimental Investigation. Foundations of Digital Games, 3-6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mads Hobye and Jonas Löwgren. 2011. Touching a stranger: Designing for engaging experience in embodied interaction. International Journal of Design 5, 3, 31-48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Amy Huggard, Anushka De Mel, Jayden Garner, Cagdas Chad Toprak, Alan Chatam, and Florian Floyd Mueller. 2013. Musical Embrace: Facilitating Engaging Play Experiences through Social Awkwardness. Proceedings of CHI'13, 3067-3070. http://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2479612 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Gijs Huisman, Aduen Darriba Frederiks, Betsy Van Dijk, Dirk Heylen, and Ben Kröse. 2013. The TaSST: Tactile Sleeve for Social Touch. World Haptics Conference (WHC), 2013, 211-216.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kazuki Iida and Kenji Suzuki. 2011. Enhanced Touch: A Wearable Device for Social Playware. Proceedings of Advances in Computer Entertainment - ACE 2011, 4-5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Katherine Isbister, Rahul Rao, Ulf Schwekendiek, Elizabeth Hayward, and Jessamyn Lidasan. 2011. Is more movement better? A Controlled Comparison of Movement-based Games. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games - FDG '11, 331-333. http://doi.org/10.1145/2159365.2159429 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Charlene Jennett, Anna L. Cox, Paul Cairns, et al. 2008. Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66, 9, 641-661. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.04.004 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. N. Jonassen. 1998. Human body capacitance: static or dynamic concept? {ESD}. Electrical Overstress/ Electrostatic Discharge Symposium Proceedings. 1998 (Cat. No.98TH8347), 1-7. http://doi.org/10.1109/EOSESD.1998.737028Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. P. J. Lang. 1980. Behavioural Treatment And BioBehavioural Assessment: Computer Applications. Technology in Mental Health Care Delivery Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Paul Lemmens, Floris Crompvoets, Dirk Brokken, J. V D Eerenbeemd, and G. J D Vries. 2009. A body-conforming tactile jacket to enrich movie viewing. World Haptics 2009, 7-12. http://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2009.4810832 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Regan L. Mandryk, Kori M. Inkpen, and Thomas W. Calvert. 2006. Using psychophysiological techniques to measure user experience with entertainment technologies. Behaviour & Information Technology 25, 2, 141-158. http://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500331156Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. RL Mandryk and KM Inkpen. 2001. Supporting free play in ubiquitous computer games. UbiComp '01, 1-6. Retrieved January 29, 2014 from http://www.cse.chalmers.se/research/group/idc/ituni v/student/2002/reevolution/CoopGames/mandryk.p dfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Florian Mueller and Katherine Isbister. 2014. Movement-based game guidelines. Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI '14, 2191- 2200. http://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557163 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Janet H. Murray. 1997. Hamlet on the Holodeck.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Bruno Nadeau and Amanda Williams. Tactful Interaction: Exploring Interactive Social Touch Through a Collaborative Tangible Installation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Kosuke Nakajima. 2013. Emoballoon: a Balloonshaped Interface Recognizing Social Touch Interactions. Virtual Reality (VR).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Hideyuki Nakanishi, Kazuaki Tanaka, Yuya Wada, and Technology Agency. 2014. Remote Handshaking: Touch Enhances Video-Mediated Social Telepresence. Proceedings of CHI'14, 2143- 2152. http://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557169 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Avinash Nandwani, Paul Coulton, and Reuben Edwards. 2011. NFC Mobile Parlor Games Enabling Direct Player to Player Interaction. 2011 Third International Workshop on Near Field Communication, 21-25. http://doi.org/10.1109/NFC.2011.19 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. NetherRealm Studios. 2015. Mortal Combat. Retrieved from http://www.mortalkombat.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Marianna Obrist, Sriram Subramanian, Elia Gatti, Benjamin Long, and Thomas Carter. 2015. Emotions Mediated Through Mid-Air Haptics. 2053-2062. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Karolien Poels, Yvonne De Kort, and Wijnand IJsselsteijn. 2007. "It is always a lot of fun!": Exploring dimensions of digital game experience using focus group methodology. Future Play 2007, 83-89. http://doi.org/10.1145/1328202.1328218 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Munehiko Sato, Ivan Poupyrev, and Chris Harrison. 2012. Touché. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI '12, c, 483. http://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207743Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Douglas Edward Wilson. 2012. Designing for the Pleasures of Disputation-Or-how to Make Friends by Trying to Kick Them!. IT University of Copenhagen, Innovative Communication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Bob G Witmer and Michael J Singer. 1998. Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence. Presence 7, 3, 225-240. http://doi.org/10.1026//1617--6383.15.2.69 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Yohei Yamaguchi, Hidekatsu Yanagi, and Yoshinari Takegawa. 2013. Touch-Shake: Design and Implementation of a Physical Contact Support Device for Face-to-Face Communication. IEEE Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE), 170-174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Sensation: Measuring the Effects of a Human-to-Human Social Touch Based Controller on the Player Experience

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader