ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Maintenance of stratified databases viewed as a belief revision system
Full text PdfPdf (926 KB)
Source Symposium on Principles of Database Systems archive
Proceedings of the sixth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems table of contents
San Diego, California, United States
Pages: 136 - 145  
Year of Publication: 1987
ISBN:0-89791-223-3
Authors
K. Apt  Laboratorie d'Informatique, Ecole Normale Supéneure, 45 rue d'Ulm, 75230 Paris and LITP, Université Pans 7, 2 Place Jussieu, 75251 Paris and CWI Kruislaan 413, 1098 SJ, Amsterdam The Netherlands
J. M. Pugin  Bull Research Center, PC 58 A 14 - A I Division, 68 route de Versailles, 78430 Louveciennes
Sponsors
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
SIGOPS: ACM Special Interest Group on Operating Systems
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 6,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/28659.28674
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We study here declarative and dynamic aspects of non-monotonic reasoning in the context of deductive databases. More precisely, we consider here maintenance of a special class of indefinite deductive databases, called stratified databases, introduced in Apt, Blair and Walker [ABW] and Van Gelder [VG] in which recursion “through” negation is disallowed. A stratified database has a natural model associated with it which is selected as its intended meaning. The maintenance problem for these databases is complicated because insertions can lead to deletions and vice versa. To solve this problem we make use of the ideas present in the works of Doyle [D] and de Kleer [dK] on belief revision systems. We offer here a number of solutions which differ in the amount of static and dynamic information used and the form of support introduced. We also discuss the implementation issues and the trade-offs involved.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
ABW
BMSU
 
CH
Chandra, A and Harel, D, 'Horn Clause Queries and Generahzauons", Journal of Logic Programming, vol 1, pp 1-15, 1985
 
C
Cousot, P, "Asynchronous Iterattve Methods For Solving a Fixed Pomt System of Monotone Equauons m a Complete LatUce",Rapport de Recherche N 88, L A 7, Umv Sclenufique et Medlcale de Grenoble, 1977
 
D
Do)le, J, "A Truth Mamtenance System", Art~ficml lntelhgence 12, pp 231-272, 1979
GMN
 
VG
Van Gelder, A, "Negauon as Fmlure Using T~ght Denvauons for General Logic Programs", in Proc Thud IEEE S ymposmm on Logic Programming, Salt Lake City, Utah, 1986
 
dK
 
L
Lffschltz, V, "On the Declarauve SemanUcs of Logic Programs w~th Negatmn", m Proc Workshop on Foundations of DeducUve Databases and Logzc Programming, Washington D C, pp 420- 432, 1986
 
LST
Lloyd, J W, Sonenberg, E A and Topor, R, "integrity Constraint Checkang m Stmufied D-a,,~t ~ses', Techmcal Report 86/5, Dept of Computer Science, Un,, of Melbourne, 1986
 
MC
McCarthy, J, "Ca'cumscnptton - A Form of Non-monotonic Reasoning", Aruficml Intelhgence 13, pp 295-323, 1980
 
MS
Martins, J P, and Shapwo, S C, "Reasomng m Mullaple Belief Spaces", m Proc IJCAI-83, pp 370-373, 1983
 
NY
Nicolas, J-M, and Yazdanlan, K, "An Outhne of BDGEN a Deducuve DBMS", m Proc IFIP- 83,pp 711-717, 1983
 
Pu
Pugm, J-M, "BOUM Manuel de reference et d'uuhsat~on", Rapport Interne du Centre de Recherche BULL, 1984
 
Pr
Przymusmsk~, T, "On the Semanucs of Strattfied Deducuve Databases", m Proc Workshop on Foundattons of Deducttve Databases and Logzc Programming, Washington D C, pp 433-443, 1986
 
S1
 
S2
 
SS
Stallman, R M and Sussman, G J, "Forward Reasoning and Dependency-Dtrected Backtracking m a System for Computer-A~ded Ctrcmt Analysis", Aruficml Intelhgence 9, pp 135-196, 1977
 
TS
 
STZE
Shmueh, O, Tsar, S, Zfira, H, and Ever-Had,ant, R, "Dynamic Rule Support m Prolog", Manuscript, 1985



Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read:
  • LR Parsing ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)   6, 2
    A. V. Aho ,  S. C. Johnson