skip to main content
10.1145/2872518.2890580acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Ubiquitous Learning and Digital Literacy Practices Connecting Teacher and Learner

Published: 11 April 2016 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss digital literacy and preservice teacher education and reflect on the current state of web-based education and development of digital literacy in teacher education in Slovenia. The literacy context is discussed in the context of the Educational Technology course which is delivered in teacher education. The aim of this course for preservice preprimary and primary classroom teachers is to develop student teachers' digital literacy and prepare them for the efficient integration of ICT into their teaching. This will in turn influence learners' digital literacy and competence for active engagement in the emerging culture of participation. The paper discusses web-based teaching methodology with a focus on instructional design, learning resources and high-order learning outcomes. The affordance of mobile technology fosters ubiquitous learning which has been integrated into the teacher education curriculum. The notion of tools in learning and literacies is discussed in the context of the transition from traditional written culture to digital culture. In integrating mobile learning, three important dimensions converge, underlining the development of digital literacy: the technology dimension of wireless mobile providing instant access, the social dimension and the learning behaviours dimension. A survey was conducted to examine undergraduate student-teachers' attitudes on the application of ubiquitous education and the development of digital literacy through the integration of mobile learning. The results indicate that student-teachers have developed competences in a variety of mobile learning and teaching activities They believe that mobile technology increases connection between learner and teacher but are neutral about the integration of children's social practices from their free time to school environment.

References

[1]
Behrens. S. J. (1994). A Conceptual Analysis and Historical Overview of Information Literacy. College & Research Libraries, 55, 4, 309--322.
[2]
McMillan. S. (1996). Literacy and computer literacy: definitions and comparisons. COMPUT EDUC, 27, 3--4, 161--170.
[3]
Fetler. M. 1985. Sex differences in the California statewide assessment of computer literacy. SEX ROLES. 13, 3/4, 181--191.
[4]
Markauskaite. L. (2006). Towards an integrated analytical framework of information and communications technology literacy: from intended to implemented and achieved dimensions. Information Research, 11, 3, paper 252 {Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/11--3/paper252.html}
[5]
Digital Transformation - A Framework for ICT Literacy: A Report of the International ICT Literacy Panel. {Available at http:// www.ets.org/research/ictliteracy}
[6]
Mackey. T. P. & Jacobson. T. E. 2002. Reframing Information Literacy as a Metaliteracy. College & Research Libraries, 72, 1, 62--78.
[7]
Lakshear. C. & Knobel. M. 2008.Introduction: Digital Literacies-Concepts, Policies and Practices. Digital Literacies Concepts, Policy and Practice. Eds. Colin. Lakshear & Michael. Knobel. New York: Peter Lang.
[8]
Ferrari. A. 2012. Digital competence in practice: An analysis of practice. JCR Technical reports. European Commission JCR.
[9]
Kimber. K. & Wyatt Smith. C. 2010. Secondary students' online use and creation of knowledge: Refocusing priorities for quality assessment and learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 5, 607--625.
[10]
Miller.S. M. & McVee. M. B. 2012. Multimodal Composing: The Essential 21st Century Literacy. In: Multimodal Composing in Classrooms: Learning and Teaching for the Digital World. S. M. Miller & M. B. McWee (Eds.). (pp. 1--12). New York: Routledge.
[11]
Vygotsky. L. S. 1978. Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[12]
NCTE Position statement on multimodal literacy. 2005. {Available at http:// www.ncte.org/positions/statements/multimodalliteracies}
[13]
Ismail N. A. & O'Brien. E.A. 2008. Enabling Multimodal Interaction in Web-Based Personal Digital Photo Browsing. Int. Conf. on Computer and Communication Engineering.
[14]
Havelock. E. H. 1986. The Alphabetic Mind: A Gift of Greece to the Modern World. Oral Tradition, 1,1, 134--150.
[15]
Johnson. L. Adams. S. & Cummins. M. 2012. The NMC Horizon Report: 2012 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
[16]
Vlieghe. J. 2015. Traditional and digital literacy. The literacy hypothesis, technologies of reading and writing, and the "grammatized" body, Ethics and Education, 10, 2, 209--226.
[17]
Ristimaki. E. Niemi. H. Tissari. V. Mikkola. A. Jakku-Sihvonen. R. 2006. Promoting the Pedagogical Use of ICT in Finnish Universities and Teacher Education Programmes. In: Jakku-Sihvonen, R., Niemi, H. (Eds.). Research-Based Teacher Education in Finland: Reflection by Finnish Teacher Educators. Turku: Finnish Educational Research Association. 123--150.
[18]
Istenic. Starcic. A. Cotic. M. Solomonides. I. Volk. M. 2016. Engaging preservice primary and preprimary school teachers in digital storytelling for the teaching and learning of mathematics. BRIT J EDUC TECHNOL, 47, 1, 29--40.
[19]
Mouza. C. Karchmer-Klein. R. Nandakumar. R. Ozden. S. Y. Hu. L. 2014. Investigating the impact of an integrated approach to the development of preservice teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). COMPUT EDUC, 71, 206--221.
[20]
Jenkins. H. Purushotoma. R. Clinton. K. Weigel. M. Robison. A. J. 2009. Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21 st century. (H. Jenkins, Ed.). Chicago, IL: The MacArthur Foundation.
[21]
Buckingham. D. 2007. Beyond technology: Children learn in the age of digital culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
[22]
Drent. M. & Meelissen. M. 2008. Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? COMPUT EDUC, 51, 187--199.
[23]
Tondeur. J. Coopert. M. Newhouse. C. P. 2007. From ICT coordination to ICT integration: a longitudinal case study. J COMPUT ASSIST LEAR, 26/4, 296--306.
[24]
Piaget. J. 2003. The Psychology of Intelligence. London: Routledge.
[25]
Bruner. J. 1966. Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[26]
{26} Kress. G. 2003. Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
[27]
Kress. G. 2010. Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. New York: Routledge.
[28]
Koole. M. L. 2009. A model for framing mobile technology. In M. Ally (Ed.). Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training, 25--47. Edmonton, AB: AU Press, Athabasca University.
[29]
van Dijk. J. A. G. M. 2012. The evolution of the digital divide: The digital divide turns to inequality of skills and usage. Digital Enlightenment Yearbook 2012. J. Bus et al. (Eds.) IOS Press, 57--75.

Index Terms

  1. Ubiquitous Learning and Digital Literacy Practices Connecting Teacher and Learner

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WWW '16 Companion: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web
    April 2016
    1094 pages
    ISBN:9781450341448

    Sponsors

    • IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

    Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

    Publication History

    Published: 11 April 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. mobile technology
    2. teacher
    3. web education
    4. web literacy curriculum

    Qualifiers

    • Abstract

    Conference

    WWW '16
    Sponsor:
    • IW3C2
    WWW '16: 25th International World Wide Web Conference
    April 11 - 15, 2016
    Québec, Montréal, Canada

    Acceptance Rates

    WWW '16 Companion Paper Acceptance Rate 115 of 727 submissions, 16%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 172
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media