skip to main content
research-article

Animating the ethical demand: exploring user dispositions in industry innovation cases through animation-based sketching

Published:05 January 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This paper addresses the challenge of attaining ethical user stances during the design process of products and services and proposes animation-based sketching as a design method, which supports elaborating and examining different ethical stances towards the user. The discussion is qualified by an empirical study of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in a Triple Helix constellation. Using a three-week long innovation workshop, UCrAc, involving 16 Danish companies and organisations and 142 students as empirical data, we discuss how animation-based sketching can explore not yet existing user dispositions, as well as create an incentive for ethical conduct in development and innovation processes. The ethical fulcrum evolves around Løgstrup's Ethical Demand and his notion of spontaneous life manifestations. From this, three ethical stances are developed; apathy, sympathy and empathy. By exploring both apathetic and sympathetic views, the ethical reflections are more nuanced as a result of actually seeing the user experience simulated through different user dispositions. Exploring the three ethical stances by visualising real use cases with the technologies simulated as already being implemented makes the life manifestations of the users in context visible. We present and discuss how animation-based sketching can support the elaboration and examination of different ethical stances towards the user in the product and service development process. Finally we present a framework for creating narrative representations of emerging technology use cases, which invite to reflection upon the ethics of the user experience.

References

  1. Buchanan, R. 1992. Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues Vol. 8, No. 2 (Spring, 1992), pp. 5--21. MIT PressGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Chayutsahakij, P. and Poggenpohl S. 2002. User-Centered Innovation. Proceedings of The European Academy of Management 2nd Annual Conference on Innovative Research in Management EURAM, Stockholm, SwedenGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. von Schomberg. 2011. The quest for the "right" impacts of science and technology. An outlook towards a framework for responsible research and innovation. in: (eds M. Dusseldorp, R. Beecroft) Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren. Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden. SpringerGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. ETHICOMP 2015 call for papers on RRI: http://www.dmu.ac.uk/research/research-faculties-and-institutes/technology/centre-for-computing-and-social-responsibility/tracks.aspx Retrieved June 30th 2015Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. RRI Tools http://www.rri-tools.eu/project-description Retrieved June 30th 2015Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, T. 2009. Change By Design. Harper BusinessGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. 2012. The design way intentional change in an unpredictable world. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Suchman L. 1987. Plans and situated actions : The Problem of Human- Machine Communication, Cambridge University Press Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Greenbaum, J., & Kyng, M. (Eds.) 1991. Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Bannon, L. & Bødker, S. 1989. Beyond the Interface: Encountering Artifacts in Use, Aarhus University PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hassenzahl M., Tractinsky N. 2006. User experience - a research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology Vol. 25, Issue 2 2006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Vistisen, P., & Jensen, T. 2013. The Ethics of User Experience Design: Discussed by the Terms of Apathy, Sympathy, and Empathy. I A. Gerdes, T. W. Bynum, W. Fleishman, S. Rogerson, & G. Møldrup Nielsen (red.), ETHICOMP 2013 Conference Proceedings: The possibilities of ethical ICT. Odense: Syddansk UniversitetsforlaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Løgstrup, K. E. 1997. The Ethical Demand. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Nyeng, F. 2000. Etiske teorier. København: Gyldendal Uddannelse.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Løgstrup, K. E. 2007. Beyond the Ethical Demand. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Løgstrup, K. E. 2014. Etiske begreber og problemer. Aarhus: Forlaget Klim.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Pahuus, M. 1995. Holdning og spontaneitet. Pædagogik, Menneskesyn og værdier. Århus: Kvan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Edman, T. Keitsch, M., Vavik, T., Morelli, N., Poulsen, S. B., Koskinen, I., Holmlid, S., et al. 2010. LUDINNO - Learning Labs for User-Driven Innovation. Oslo, Norway: Nordic Innovation CentreGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Etzkowitz, H. 2003. Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social science information, 42(3), 293--337.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Raijmakers, R., Sommerwerk, A., Leihener, J., Tulusan, I. 2009. How sticky research drives service design. Service Design Network conference in Madeira. Chow, M. D. 1989. The role of the video professional in a research environment. ACM SIGCHI BulletinGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Chow, M. D. 1989. The role of the video professional in a research environment. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Stephenson, R. 1973. The Animated Film. Tantivy PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Baek, Y. K. and Layne, B. H. Color, graphics, and animation in a computer-assisted learning tutorial lesson. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 15, 4 (1988), 131--135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Elish, M. C. 2011. Responsible storytelling: communicating research in video demos. Proc. TEI'11, 25--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Vistisen, P. 2014. Abductive Sensemaking Through Sketching. Academic Quarter, vol 9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Fallman, D. & Moussette, C. 2011. Sketching with Stop Motion Animation. ACM interactions, Volume XVIII.2, March + April, New York, NY: ACM Press, 57--61 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Löwgren, J. 2004. Animated use sketches as design representations. interactions vol 11, issue 6, ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Fallman, D., Zarin, R. & Lindbergh, K. 2012. Stop Motion Animation as a Tool for Sketching in Architecture. Proceedings of DRS 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Bonanni, L. and Ishii, H. 2009. Stop-motion prototyping for tangible interfaces. Proc. of the Third International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction. ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Mackay, W. 1988. Video Prototyping - a technique for developing hypermedia systems. CHI'88 Demonstration, ACM/SIGCHI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Vertelney, L. 1989. Using video to prototype user interfaces. SIGCHI Bulletin 21(2):57--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Bardam, Bossen, Lykke-Olesen, Halskov & Nielsen. 2002. Virtual Video Prototyping of Pervasive Healthcare Systems. DIS 2002. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Tikkanen, T., Cabrera, AB. 2008. Using Video to Support Co-Design of Information and Communication Technologies. Observatorio Journal, Vol 5. Obercom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Vistisen, P., & Poulsen, S. B. 2015. Investigating User Experiences Through Animation-based Sketching. The Motion Design Education Summit 2015 (MODE 15), DublinGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Fernández J., Martens, J. B. O. S. 2013. idAnimate: A General Purpose Animation Sketching Tool for Multi-touch Devices. Proceedings of CONTENT 2013. IARIA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Davis R. C., Colwell B., Landay J. A. 2008. K-sketch: a 'kinetic' sketch pad for novice animators. Proc. Of Human factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Sohn, E., Choy, Y. C. 2010. Sketch-n-Stretch:sketching animations using cutouts. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Guston, D. 2013. "Daddy, can I Have a Puddle Gator?" Creativity, Anticipation and Responsible Innovation, in Owen, R., Bessant, J. & Heintz, M. (ed.) Responsible Innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., Bederson, B. B., Druin, A., Plaisant, C., Beaudouin- Lafon, M., Conversy, S., Evans, H., Hansen, H., Roussel, N., Eiderbäck, B., Lindquist, S., & Sundblad, Y. 2003. Technology Probes: Inspiring Design for and with Families. In CHI 2003 (17--24). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Web 1: www.ucrac.dk. Retrieved June 30th 2015Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Stilgoe, J., Owen, R. Macnaghten, P. 2013. Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res. Policy 42: 1568--1580Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Stahl, Bernd Carsten. 2013. Responsible research and innovation: The role of privacy in an emerging framework. Science and Public Policy 40 (6)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Buxton B. 2007. Sketching User Experiences - getting right design, and getting the design right", Morgan Kaufman Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Carroll, J. 1995. Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development. John Wiley & Sons Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Web 2: Interactive experience room. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26F6qOf4JfY. Retrieved June 30th 2015Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Web 3: Digital games in the table. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q11VjTIbYPU. Retrieved June 30th 2015Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Web 4: Social touch screen. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQ1JXiofFqU. Retrieved June 30th 2015Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Web 5: Plejepad. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3Iy12y-kYs. Retrieved June 30th 2015Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Cooper, A. 1999. The Inmates are Running the Asylum: Why High-Tech Product Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity. Indianapolis: Sams Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Vlissides, J. 1994. Design Patterns. Addison-Wesley ProfessionalGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Bleecker, J. 2009. Design Fiction: A short essay on design, science, fact and fiction. Future Lab., vol. 29Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Knutz, E., Markussen, T., and Christensen, P. 2013. The Role of Fiction in Experiments within Design, Art & Architecture. presented at the Nordic Design Research (NORDES 13)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Dunne, A. 1999. Hertzian tales: electronic products, aesthetic experience, and critical design. London: RCA CRD research publications Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Animating the ethical demand: exploring user dispositions in industry innovation cases through animation-based sketching

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society
            ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society  Volume 45, Issue 3
            Special Issue on Ethicomp
            September 2015
            446 pages

            Copyright © 2016 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 5 January 2016

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader