Values-first SE: research principles in practice

ABSTRACT

The realization that software has a far reaching impact on politics, society and the environment is not new. However, only recently software impact has been explicitly described as 'systemic' and framed around complex social problems such as sustainability. We argue that 'wicked' social problems are consequences of the interplay between complex economical, technical and political interactions and their underlying value choices. Such choices are guided by specific sets of human values that have been found in all cultures by extensive evidence-based research. The aim of this paper is to give more visibility to the interrelationship between values and SE choices. To this end, we first introduce the concept of Values-First SE and reflect on its implications for software development. Our contribution to SE is embedding the principles of values research in the SE decision making process and extracting lessons learned from practice.

References

1. Z. Bajmócy and J. Gébert. The outlines of innovation policy in the capability approach. Technology in Society, 38:93--102, 2014.
2. C. Becker, R. Chitchyan, et al. Sustainability design and software: The karlskrona manifesto. In Proc. of the 37th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 467--476. IEEE, 2015.
3. B. Boehm and L. G. Huang. Value-based software engineering. Computer, 36(3):33--41, 2003.
4. B. W. Boehm et al. Software engineering economics, volume 197. Prentice-hall Englewood Cliffs (NJ), 1981.
5. W. S. R. Boyd, R L et al. Values in words: Using language to evaluate and understand personal values. In Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 2015.
6. M. Braungart, W. McDonough, and A. Bollinger. Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions. Journal of cleaner production, 15(13):1337--1348, 2007.
7. J. Cabot, S. Easterbrook, et al. Integrating sustainability in decision-making processes: A modelling strategy. In In Companion Proc. of the 31st International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 207--210. IEEE, 2009.
8. P. I. R. Centre. The common cause handbook, 2011.
9. P. Chilton, T. Crompton, T. Kasser, G. Maio, and A. Nolan. Communicating bigger-than-self problems to extrinsically-oriented audiences. Common Cause Research, UK, 2012.
10. T. Crompton and T. Kasser. Meeting environmental challenges: The role of human identity. WWF-UK Godalming, UK, 2009.
11. F. Curmi, M. A. Ferrario, and J. Whittle. Bioshare: a research tool for analyzing social networks effects when sharing biometrie data. In Proc. of the 2014 Conference on Designing interactive systems, pages 101--104. ACM, 2014.
12. S. Easterbrook. From computational thinking to systems thinking: A conceptual toolkit for sustainability computing. In ICT for Sustainability 2014 (ICT4S-14). Atlantis Press, 2014.
13. A. Feenberg. Ten paradoxes of technology. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 14(1):3--15, 2010.
14. M. A. Ferrario, W. Simm, P. Newman, S. Forshaw, and J. Whittle. Software engineering for'social good': integrating action research, participatory design, and agile development. In Companion Proc. of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 520--523. ACM, 2014.
15. S. Forshaw, L. Cruickshank, and A. Dix. Collaborative communication tools for designing: Physical-cyber environments. In Fourth International Workshop on Physicality, page 47, 2012.
16. S. Forshaw, P. Newman, M. A. Ferrario, W. Simm, A. Friday, and P. Coulton. Stimulating a dialogue on renewable energy through making. In Proc. of the 2014 companion publication on Designing interactive systems, pages 17--20. ACM, 2014.
17. S. Frey, A. Diaconescu, D. Menga, and I. Demeure. A holonic control architecture for a heterogeneous multi-objective smart micro-grid. In 2013 IEEE 7th International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems, pages 21--30. IEEE, 2013.
18. B. Friedman. Value-sensitive design, interactions, 3(6):16--23, 1996.
19. B. Friedman, D. G. Hendry, A. Huldtgren, C. Jonker, J. Hoven, and A. Wynsberghe. Charting the next decade for value sensitive design. Aarhus series on human centered computing, 1(1), 2015.
20. B. Friedman, P. H. Kahn Jr, A. Borning, and A. Huldtgren. Value sensitive design and information systems. In Early engagement and new technologies, pages 55--95. Springer, 2013.
21. D. Gotterbarn. Software engineering ethics. Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, 2001.
22. D. Gotterbarn, K. Miller, and S. Rogerson. Computer society and acm approve software engineering code of ethics. Computer, 32(10):84--88, 1999.
23. GreenAlliance. A circular economy for smart devices opportunities in the us, uk and india, 2015. http://www.green-alliance.org.uk/resources/Acirculareconomyforsmartdevices.pdf.
24. Hackaday. Ethics in engineering: Volkswagen's diesel fiasco, 2015. http://hackaday.com/2015/09/23/ethics-in-engineering-Volkswagens-diesel-fiasco/.
25. H. Haddadi, R. Mortier, D. McAuley, and J. Crowcroft. Human-data interaction. University of Cambridge, 2013.
26. G. R. Hayes. The relationship of action research to hci. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 18(3):15, 2011.
27. M. Khurum, T. Gorschek, and M. Wilson. The software value map-an exhaustive collection of value aspects for the development of software intensive products. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 25(7):711--741, 2013.
28. B. Knowles, L. Blair, S. Walker, et al. Patterns of persuasion for sustainability. In Proc. of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems, pages 1035--1044. ACM, 2014.
29. G. Lakoff. Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1):70--81, 2010.
30. A. Marinos and G. Briscoe. Community cloud computing. In Cloud Computing, pages 472--484. Springer, 2009.
31. K. W. Miller and D. K. Larson. Agile software development: human values and culture. Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE, 24(4):36--42, 2005.
32. S. L. Miller. Values-based recruitment in health care. Nursing Standard, 29(21):37--41, 2015.
33. P. Newman, M. A. Ferrario, W. Simm, S. Forshaw, A. Friday, and J. Whittle. The role of design thinking and physical prototyping in social software engineering. In Proc. of the 37th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 487--496. IEEE, 2015.
34. B. Penzenstadler, A. Raturi, D. Richardson, and B. Tomlinson. Safety, security, now sustainability: The nonfunctional requirement for the 21st century. Software, IEEE, 31(3):40--47, 2014.
35. R. W. Picard. Recognizing stress, engagement, and positive emotion. In Proc. of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 3--4. ACM, 2015.
36. S. H. Schwartz. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in experimental social psychology, 25(1):1--65, 1992.
37. S. H. Schwartz. Basic human values: Theory, measurement, and applications. Revue française de sociologie, 47(4):249--288, 2006.
38. W. Simm, M. A. Ferrario, A. Friday, P. Newman, S. Forshaw, M. Hazas, and A. Dix. Tiree energy pulse: exploring renewable energy forecasts on the edge of the grid. In Proc. of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1965--1974. ACM, 2015.
39. W. Simm, M. A. Ferrario, A. Gradinar, M. Smith, S. Forshaw, I. Smith, and J. Whittle. Anxiety and autism: towards personalized digital health. In Proc. of the 34rd Annual ACM Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems., page in Press. ACM, 2016.
40. W. Simm, M. A. Ferrario, A. Gradinar, and J. Whittle. Prototyping clasp: implications for designing digital technology for and with adults with autism. In Proc. of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems, pages 345--354. ACM, 2014.
41. J. Southern, R. Ellis, M. A. Ferrario, R. McNally, R. Dillon, W. Simm, and J. Whittle. Imaginative labour and relationships of care: Co-designing prototypes with vulnerable communities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 84:131--142, 2014.
42. W. Stahel and G. Reday. The potential for substituting manpower for energy, report to the commission of the european communities, 1976.
43. B. Su, A. Heshmati, Y. Geng, and X. Yu. A review of the circular economy in china: moving from rhetoric to implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 42:215--227, 2013.
44. J. Van den Hoven. Human capabilities and technology. In The Capability Approach, Technology and Design, pages 27--36. Springer, 2012.
45. J. Van den Hoven, G.-J. Lokhorst, and I. Van de Poel. Engineering and the problem of moral overload. Science and engineering ethics, 18(1):143--155, 2012.

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

• Software and its engineering

  • Software creation and management

    • Software development process management

      • Software development methods

        • Rapid application development