A guided tour of the legal implications of software cloning

ABSTRACT

Software Cloning is the typical example where an interdisciplinary approach may bring additional elements into the community's discussion. In fact, little research has been done in its analysis from an Intellectual Propriety Rights (IPRs) perspective, even if it is a widely studied aspect of software engineering. An interdisciplinary approach is crucial to better understand the legal implications of software in the IPR context. Interestingly, the academic community of software and systems deals much more with such IPR issues than courts themselves. In this paper, we analyze some recent legal decisions in using software clones from a software engineering perspective. In particular, we survey the behavior of some major courts about cloning issues. As a major outcome of our research, it seems that legal fora do not have major concerns regarding copyright infringements in software cloning. The major contribution of this work is a case by case analysis of more than one hundred judgments by the US courts and the European Court of Justice. We compare the US and European courts case laws and discuss the impact of a recent European ruling. The US and EU contexts are quite different, since in the US software is patentable while in the EU it is not. Hence, European courts look more permissive regarding cloning, since "principles," or "ideas," are not copyrightable by themselves.

References

1. Baker, B.: On finding duplication and near-duplication in large software systems. Proceedings of the 2nd Working Conference on Reverse Engineering (WCRE 95), Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 86--95 (1995)
2. Bergstra, J., Klint P.: About "trivial" software patents: The IsNot case. Science of Computer Programming. 64, 264--285 (2006)
3. Ciancarini, P., Favini G. P.: Detecting clones in game-playing software. Entertainment Computing. 1, 9--15 (2009)
4. Ciancarini, P., Russo D., Sillitti, A., Succi, G.: Reverse Engineering: a European IPR perspective. 31st ACM Symposium On Applied Computing (SAC 2016). Pisa, Italy (2016).
5. Di Penta, M, German, D. M., Guéhéneuc, Y., Antoniol, G.: An exploratory study of the evolution of software licensing. Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, 145--154, (2010)
6. German, D. M., Hassan, A. E.: License integration patterns: Adressing license mismatches in component-based development. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Software Engineering, 188--198 (2009)
7. Gross, H. G., Melideo, M., Sillitti. A.: Self Certification and Trust in Component Procurement. Journal of Science of Computer Programming, Elsevier, 56, 141--156 (2005).
8. Hylton, K., N.: Antitrust Law and Economics. Edward Elgar Publishing Lim. (2010)
9. Horspool, M., Humphreys M.: European Union Law. Oxford University Press (2012)
10. Johnson, J. H.: Substring matching for clone detection and change tracking. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Software Maintenance, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 120--126 (1994)
11. Kapser, C. J., Godfrey M. W.: "Cloning considered harmful" considered harmful: patterns of cloning in software. Empirical Software Engineering, 13, (6), 645--692, (2008)
12. Kapser, C. J., Godfrey M. W.: Supporting the analysis of clones in software systems: a case study. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice. 18, (2), 61--82 (2006)
13. Kim, M., Bergman, L., Lau, T., Notkin, D.: An Ethnographic study of copy and paste programming practices in OOPL. Proceedings of 3rd International ACM-IEEE Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE 04), Redondo Beach, CA, USA, 83--92 (2004)
14. Koschke, R.: Frontiers of software clone management. Proceedings of Frontiers of Software Maintenance (FoSM'08), Beijing, China, 119--128 (2008)
15. Lavoie, T., Eilers-Smith, M., Merlo, E.: Challenging cloning related problems with GPU-based algorithms. Proceedings of 4th International Workshop on Software Clones, Cape Town, SA, 25--32 (2010)
16. Mc Nutt, P., A.: Law, Economics and Antitrust: Towards a New Perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing Lim. (2005)
17. Monden, A., Nakae, D., Kamiya, T., Sato, S., Matsumoto, K: Software quality analysis by code clones in industrial legacy software. Proceedings of 8th IEEE International Symposium on Software Metrics (METRICS 02), Ottawa, Canada, 87--94 (2002)
18. Petrinja, E., Sillitti, A., Succi, G.: Comparing OpenBRR, QSOS, and OMM Assessment Models. 6th International Conference on Open Source Systems (OSS 2010), Notre Dame, IN, USA (2010)
19. Predonzani P., Sillitti, A., Vernazza, T.: Components and Data-Flow Applied to the Integration of Web Services. The 27th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON?01), Denver, CO, USA, 29 November - 2 December (2001)
20. Rattan, D., Bathia, R. Singh, M.: Software clone detection: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology. 55, 1165--1199 (2013)
21. Remencius, T., Sillitti, A., Succi, G.: Assessment of software developed by a third-party: A case study and comparison: Information Sciences, Elsevier, Vol. 328, 237--249 (2016)
22. Rieger, M., Ducasse, S., Lanza, M.: Insights into System - Wide Code Duplication. WCRE, Delft University of Technology. 100--109 (2004)
23. Riis, S.: What makes a chess program original? Revisiting the Rybka case. Entertainment Computing. 5:3, 189--204 (2014)
24. Roy, C. K., Cordy, J. R.: A Survey on Software Clone Detection Research. Queen's School of Computing Tech. Report 2007-541, Kingston, 115 (2007)
25. Runeson, P., Höst, M.: Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering Empirical software engineering. 14 (2), 131--164 (2009)
26. Succi, G., Succi G, Ronchetti M.: Legal Issue Regarding Software Use and Reuse within the European Union Legislation. Journal of Computing and Information Technology. 4:3, 179--186 (1996)
27. van den Herik H. J., Plaat A., Levy D., Dimov D.: Plagiarism in game programming competitions. Entertainment Computing. 5:3, 173--187 (2014)

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Computing / technology policy

    • Intellectual property

      • Copyrights