skip to main content
research-article

The diffractive achromat full spectrum computational imaging with diffractive optics

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 July 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Diffractive optical elements (DOEs) have recently drawn great attention in computational imaging because they can drastically reduce the size and weight of imaging devices compared to their refractive counterparts. However, the inherent strong dispersion is a tremendous obstacle that limits the use of DOEs in full spectrum imaging, causing unacceptable loss of color fidelity in the images. In particular, metamerism introduces a data dependency in the image blur, which has been neglected in computational imaging methods so far. We introduce both a diffractive achromat based on computational optimization, as well as a corresponding algorithm for correction of residual aberrations. Using this approach, we demonstrate high fidelity color diffractive-only imaging over the full visible spectrum. In the optical design, the height profile of a diffractive lens is optimized to balance the focusing contributions of different wavelengths for a specific focal length. The spectral point spread functions (PSFs) become nearly identical to each other, creating approximately spectrally invariant blur kernels. This property guarantees good color preservation in the captured image and facilitates the correction of residual aberrations in our fast two-step deconvolution without additional color priors. We demonstrate our design of diffractive achromat on a 0.5mm ultrathin substrate by photolithography techniques. Experimental results show that our achromatic diffractive lens produces high color fidelity and better image quality in the full visible spectrum.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

a31.mp4

mp4

247.8 MB

References

  1. Aieta, F., Genevet, P., Kats, M. A., Yu, N., Blanchard, R., Gaburro, Z., and Capasso, F. 2012. Aberration-free ultrathin flat lenses and axicons at telecom wavelengths based on plasmonic metasurfaces. Nano letters 12, 9, 4932--4936.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Aieta, F., Kats, M. A., Genevet, P., and Capasso, F. 2015. Multiwavelength achromatic metasurfaces by dispersive phase compensation. Science 347, 6228, 1342--1345.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyd, S., Parikh, N., Chu, E., Peleato, B., and Eckstein, J. 2011. Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning 3, 1, 1--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chakrabarti, A., and Zickler, T. 2011. Statistics of real-world hyperspectral images. In Proc. CVPR, IEEE, 193--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chan, S. H., Khoshabeh, R., Gibson, K. B., Gill, P. E., and Nguyen, T. Q. 2011. An augmented lagrangian method for total variation video restoration. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 20, 11, 3097--3111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Eberhart, R. C., and Shi, Y. 2001. Particle swarm optimization: developments, applications and resources. In Proc. of 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, IEEE, 81--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Fischer, R. E., Tadic-Galeb, B., Yoder, P. R., and Galeb, R. 2008. Optical system design. McGraw Hill. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gill, P. R., and Stork, D. G. 2013. Lensless ultra-miniature imagers using odd-symmetry spiral phase gratings. In Computational Optical Sensing and Imaging, OSA, CW4C-3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Goodman, J. 2008. Introduction to Fourier optics. McGraw-hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Heide, F., Rouf, M., Hullin, M. B., Labitzke, B., Heidrich, W., and Kolb, A. 2013. High-quality computational imaging through simple lenses. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 5, 149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jiang, W., Wang, J., and Dong, X. 2013. A novel hybrid algorithm for the design of the phase diffractive optical elements for beam shaping. Opt. Laser Tech. 45, 37--41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Joshi, N., Szeliski, R., and Kriegman, D. 2008. Psf estimation using sharp edge prediction. In Proc. CVPR, IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kang, G., Tan, Q., Wang, X., and Jin, G. 2010. Achromatic phase retarder applied to mwir & lwir dual-band. Opt. Express 18, 2, 1695--1703.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Kim, G., Domínguez-Caballero, J. A., and Menon, R. 2012. Design and analysis of multi-wavelength diffractive optics. Opt. Express 20, 3, 2814--2823.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Krishnan, D., and Fergus, R. 2009. Fast image deconvolution using hyper-laplacian priors. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS, 1033--1041.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Krishnan, D., Tay, T., and Fergus, R. 2011. Blind deconvolution using a normalized sparsity measure. In Proc. CVPR, IEEE, 233--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Meyers, M. M., 1998. Hybrid refractive/diffractive achromatic camera lens, Feb. 3. US Patent 5,715,091.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Monjur, M., Spinoulas, L., Gill, P. R., and Stork, D. G. 2015. Ultra-miniature, computationally efficient diffractive visual-bar-position sensor. In Proc. SensorComm, IEIFSA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Muzychenko, Y. B., Zinchik, A., Stafeev, S., and Tomilin, M. 2011. Fractal diffraction elements with variable transmittance and phase shift. In International Commission for Optics (ICO 22), International Society for Optics and Photonics, 80112F--80112F.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nakai, T., and Ogawa, H. 2002. Research on multi-layer diffractive optical elements and their application to camera lenses. In Diffractive Optics and Micro-Optics, OSA, DMA2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Nikonorov, A., Skidanov, R., Fursov, V., Petrov, M., Bibikov, S., and Yuzifovich, Y. 2015. Fresnel lens imaging with post-capture image processing. In Proc. CVPR Workshops, IEEE, 33--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Peng, Y., Fu, Q., Amata, H., Su, S., Heide, F., and Heidrich, W. 2015. Computational imaging using lightweight diffractive-refractive optics. Opt. Express 23, 24, 31393--31407.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Quirin, S., and Piestun, R. 2013. Depth estimation and image recovery using broadband, incoherent illumination with engineered point spread functions {invited}. Applied optics 52, 1, A367--A376.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Samei, E., Flynn, M. J., and Reimann, D. A. 1998. A method for measuring the presampled mtf of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device. Medical physics 25, 1, 102--113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Schuler, C. J., Hirsch, M., Harmeling, S., and Scholkopf, B. 2011. Non-stationary correction of optical aberrations. In Proc. ICCV, IEEE, 659--666. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Schuler, C. J., Burger, H. C., Harmeling, S., and Scholkopf, B. 2013. A machine learning approach for non-blind image deconvolution. In Proc. CVPR, IEEE, 1067--1074. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Schwartzburg, Y., Testuz, R., Tagliasacchi, A., and Pauly, M. 2014. High-contrast computational caustic design. ACM Trans. Graph. 33, 4, 74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Shan, Q., Jia, J., and Agarwala, A. 2008. High-quality motion deblurring from a single image. ACM Trans. Graph. 27, 3, 73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Singh, M., Tervo, J., and Turunen, J. 2014. Broadband beam shaping with harmonic diffractive optics. Opt. Express 22, 19, 22680--22688.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Skauli, T., and Farrell, J. 2013. A collection of hyperspectral images for imaging systems research. In Proc. IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging, SPIE, 86600C--86600C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith, W. J. 2005. Modern lens design. McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Stork, D. G., and Gill, P. R. 2014. Optical, mathematical, and computational foundations of lensless ultra-miniature diffractive imagers and sensors. International Journal on Advances in Systems and Measurements 7, 3, 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Su, Z., Zeng, K., Liu, L., Li, B., and Luo, X. 2014. Corruptive artifacts suppression for example-based color transfer. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 16, 4, 988--999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Wang, Y., Yun, W., and Jacobsen, C. 2003. Achromatic fresnel optics for wideband extreme-ultraviolet and x-ray imaging. Nature 424, 6944, 50--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang, P., Mohammad, N., and Menon, R. 2016. Chromaticaberration-corrected diffractive lenses for ultra-broadband focusing. Scientific reports 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Yamaguchi, M., Haneishi, H., and Ohyama, N. 2008. Beyond red--green--blue (rgb): Spectrum-based color imaging technology. JIST 52, 1, 10201--1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Ye, G., Jolly, S., Bove Jr, V. M., Dai, Q., Raskar, R., and Wetzstein, G. 2014. Toward bxdf display using multilayer diffraction. ACM Trans. Graph. 33, 6, 191. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Yuan, L., Sun, J., Quan, L., and Shum, H.-Y. 2008. Progressive inter-scale and intra-scale non-blind image deconvolution. ACM Trans. Graph. 27, 3, 74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Yue, T., Suo, J., Wang, J., Cao, X., and Dai, Q. 2015. Blind optical aberration correction by exploring geometric and visual priors. In Proc. CVPR, IEEE, 1684--1692.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhou, G., Chen, Y., Wang, Z., and Song, H. 1999. Genetic local search algorithm for optimization design of diffractive optical elements. Appl. Opt. 38, 20, 4281--4290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The diffractive achromat full spectrum computational imaging with diffractive optics

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
      ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 35, Issue 4
      July 2016
      1396 pages
      ISSN:0730-0301
      EISSN:1557-7368
      DOI:10.1145/2897824
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 July 2016
      Published in tog Volume 35, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader