skip to main content
research-article

Multiple-scattering microfacet BSDFs with the Smith model

Published:11 July 2016Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Modeling multiple scattering in microfacet theory is considered an important open problem because a non-negligible portion of the energy leaving rough surfaces is due to paths that bounce multiple times. In this paper we derive the missing multiple-scattering components of the popular family of BSDFs based on the Smith microsurface model. Our derivations are based solely on the original assumptions of the Smith model. We validate our BSDFs using raytracing simulations of explicit random Beckmann surfaces.

Our main insight is that the microfacet theory for surfaces with the Smith model can be derived as a special case of the microflake theory for volumes, with additional constraints to enforce the presence of a sharp interface, i.e. to transform the volume into a surface. We derive new free-path distributions and phase functions such that plane-parallel scattering from a microvolume with these distributions exactly produces the BSDF based on the Smith microsurface model, but with the addition of higher-order scattering.

With this new formulation, we derive multiple-scattering micro-facet BSDFs made of either diffuse, conductive, or dielectric material. Our resulting BSDFs are reciprocal, energy conserving, and support popular anisotropic parametric normal distribution functions such as Beckmann and GGX. While we do not provide closed-form expressions for the BSDFs, they are mathematically well-defined and can be evaluated at arbitrary precision. We show how to practically use them with Monte Carlo physically based rendering algorithms by providing analytic importance sampling and unbiased stochastic evaluation. Our implementation is analytic and does not use per-BSDF precomputed data, which makes our BSDFs usable with textured albedos, roughness, and anisotropy.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

a58.mp4

mp4

206.8 MB

References

  1. Beckmann, P., and Spizzichino, A. 1963. The scattering of electromagnetic waves from rough surfaces. International series of monographs on electromagnetic waves. Pergamon Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bourlier, C., and Berginc, G. 2004. Multiple scattering in the high-frequency limit with second-order shadowing function from 2d anisotropic rough dielectric surfaces: I. theoretical study. Waves in Random Media 14, 3, 229--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Cook, R. L., and Torrance, K. E. 1982. A reflectance model for computer graphics. ACM Transactions on Graphics 1, 1 (Jan.), 7--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Furfaro, R., and Ganapol, B. 2007. Spectral Theory for Photon Transport in Dense Vegetation Media: Caseology for the Canopy Equation. Transport Theory and Statistical Physics 36, 1, 107--135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Heitz, E., and d'Eon, E. 2014. Importance sampling microfacet-based BSDFs using the distribution of visible normals. In Proc. Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 103--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Heitz, E., and Dupuy, J. 2015. Implementing a simple anisotropic rough diffuse material with stochastic evaluation. Research report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Heitz, E., Dupuy, J., Crassin, C., and Dachsbacher, C. 2015. The SGGX microflake distribution. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH) 34, 4, 48:1--48:11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Heitz, E. 2014. Understanding the masking-shadowing function in microfacet-based BRDFs. Journal of Computer Graphics Techniques 3, 2, 32--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Heitz, E. 2015. Generating procedural Beckmann surfaces. Research report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hill, S., Mcauley, S., Burley, B., Chan, D., Fascione, L., Iwanicki, M., Hoffman, N., Jakob, W., Neubelt, D., Pesce, A., and Pettineo, M. 2015. Physically based shading in theory and practice. In ACM SIGGRAPH Courses. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jakob, W., Arbree, A., Moon, J. T., Bala, K., and Marschner, S. 2010. A radiative transfer framework for rendering materials with anisotropic structure. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH) 29, 4, 53:1--53:13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jakob, W., d'Eon, E., Jakob, O., and Marschner, S. 2014. A comprehensive framework for rendering layered materials. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proc. SIGGRAPH) 33, 4, 118:1--118:14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kelemen, C., and Szirmay-Kalos, L. 2001. A microfacet based coupled specular-matte brdf model with importance sampling. In Eurographics short presentations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Koenderink, J., Van Doorn, A., Dana, K., and Nayar, S. 1999. Bidirectional reflection distribution function of thoroughly pitted surfaces. International Journal of Computer Vision 31, 2, 129--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kuščer, I., and Summerfield, G. C. 1969. Symmetries in scattering of slow neutrons. Phys. Rev. 188, 3 (Dec), 1445--1449.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Li, H., Pinel, N., and Bourlier, C. 2011. A monostatic illumination function with surface reflections from one-dimensional rough surfaces. Waves in Random and Complex Media 21, 1, 105--134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Li, H., Pinel, N., and Bourlier, C. 2013. Polarized infrared reflectivity of one-dimensional gaussian sea surfaces with surface reflections. Appl. Opt. 52, 25 (Sep), 6100--6111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Li, H., Pinel, N., and Bourlier, C. 2014. Polarized infrared reflectivity of 2d sea surfaces with two surface reflections. Remote Sensing of Environment 147, 0, 145--155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Oren, M., and Nayar, S. K. 1995. Generalization of the lambertian model and implications for machine vision. International Journal of Computer Vision 14, 3, 227--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Pinel, N., Bourlier, C., and Saillard, J. 2005. Energy conservation of the scattering from one-dimensional random rough surfaces in the high-frequency limit. Opt. Lett. 30, 15 (Aug), 2007--2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Raab, M., Seibert, D., and Keller, A. 2008. Unbiased global illumination with participating media. In Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 2006, 591--606.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith, B. 1967. Geometrical shadowing of a random rough surface. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 15, 668--671.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Stam, J. 2001. An illumination model for a skin layer bounded by rough surfaces. In Rendering Techniques, 39--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Torrance, K. E., and Sparrow, E. M. 1967. Theory for off-specular reflection from roughened surfaces. Journal of the Optical Society of America (JOSA) 57, 9, 1105--1112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Walter, B., Marschner, S. R., Li, H., and Torrance, K. E. 2007. Microfacet models for refraction through rough surfaces. In Proc. Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 195--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Williams, M. M. R. 1978. Transport theory in anisotropic media. In Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 84, Cambridge Univ Press, 549--567.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Multiple-scattering microfacet BSDFs with the Smith model

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
      ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 35, Issue 4
      July 2016
      1396 pages
      ISSN:0730-0301
      EISSN:1557-7368
      DOI:10.1145/2897824
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 July 2016
      Published in tog Volume 35, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader