skip to main content
10.1145/2898459.2898462acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiuxidConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multi-layered Mobile Augmented Reality Framework for Positive User Experience

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 April 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Emerging technology like Mobile Augmented Reality (MAR) is becoming increasingly diverse and well established. However, this research field needs conceptual and practical frameworks to be followed while designing for a positive User Experience (UX). This paper presents a multi-layered conceptual MAR framework. It highlight the components needed to design MAR products and demonstrate different types of experiences invoked by the use of such products in a particular timespan. This work presents the important product aspects that need to be considered while designing for MAR to enhance its user experience.

References

  1. Ronald Azuma, Yohan Baillot, Reinhold Behringer, Steven Feiner, Simon Julier, and Blair MacIntyre. "Recent advances in augmented reality." Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE 21, no. 6 (2001): 34--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ronald Azuma. "A survey of augmented reality." Presence: Teleoperators and virtual environments 6, no. 4 (1997): 355--385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Marcos Buccini and Stephania Padovani. "Typology of the experiences." In Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces, pp. 495--504. ACM, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreas Düvnser, Raphaël Grasset, Hartmut Seichter, and Mark Billinghurst. "Applying HCI principles to AR systems design." HIT Lab NZ, University of Canterbury, New Zealand (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ergonomics of human system interaction - part 210: Human-centered design for interactive systems. Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Tech. rep. International, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Joseph L. Gabbard and D. Hix. 2001. Researching usability design and evaluation guidelines for augmented reality (AR) systems. Laboratory for Scientific Visual Analysis, Virginia Tech, USA, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Tobias Höllerer, Steven Feiner, Drexel Hallaway, Blaine Bell, Marco Lanzagorta, Dennis Brown, Simon Julier, Yohan Baillot, and Lawrence Rosenblum. 2001, "User interface management techniques for collaborative mobile augmented reality." Computers & Graphics 25, no. 5 (2001): 799--810.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Tobias Höllerer, and Steve Feiner. "Mobile augmented reality." Telegeoinformatics: Location-Based Computing and Services. Taylor and Francis Books Ltd., London, UK 21 (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Marc. Hassenzahl, "The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness." International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 13, no. 4 (2001): 481--499.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Marc. Hassenzahl, "The thing and I: understanding the relationship between user and product." In Funology, pp. 31--42. Springer Netherlands, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Marc. Hassenzahl and Noam Tractinsky. "User experience-a research agenda." Behaviour & information technology 25, no. 2 (2006): 91--97.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Marc. Hassenzahl, "User experience (UX): towards an experiential perspective on product quality." In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Association Francophone d'Interaction Homme-Machine, pp. 11--15. ACM, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Marc. Hassenzahl, Kai Eckoldt, Sarah Diefenbach, Matthias Laschke, Eva Len, and Joonhwan Kim. "Designing moments of meaning and pleasure. Experience design and happiness." International Journal of Design 7, no. 3 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Shafaq Irshad, and Dayang Rohaya Awang Rambli. "User experience evaluation of mobile AR services." In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia, pp. 119--126. ACM, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Patrick W. Jordan, Designing pleasurable products: An introduction to the new human factors. CRC press, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kari Kuutti. 2010. Where Are the Ionians of User Experience Research?. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (NordiCHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 715--718. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1868914.1869012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Paul Milgram, Haruo Takemura, Akira Utsumi, and Fumio Kishino. 1995 "Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum." In Photonics for industrial applications, pp. 282--292. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Alexander G. Mirnig, Alexander Meschtscherjakov, Daniela Wurhofer, Thomas Meneweger, and Manfred Tscheligi. "A Formal Analysis of the ISO 9241-210 Definition of User Experience." In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 437--450. ACM, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Donald A Norman, Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic books, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Thomas Olsson, Tuula Kärkkäinen, Else Lagerstam, and Leena Ventä-Olkkonen. "User evaluation of mobile augmented reality scenarios." Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments 4, no. 1 (2012): 29--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Thomas Olsson, Else Lagerstam, Tuula Kärkkäinen, and Kaisa Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila. "Expected user experience of mobile augmented reality services: a user study in the context of shopping centres." Personal and ubiquitous computing 17, no. 2 (2013): 287--304.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Thomas. Olsson, "Concepts and subjective measures for evaluating user experience of mobile augmented reality services." In Human factors in augmented reality environments, pp. 203--232. Springer New York, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Thomas. Olsson, "Layers of user expectations of future technologies: an early framework." In CHI'14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1957--1962. ACM, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Panagiotis D Ritsos, Dennis P. Ritsos, and Antonis S. Gougoulis. "Standards for Augmented Reality: a User Experience perspective." In International AR standards meeting, pp. 1--9. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Virpi Roto, Effie Law, A. P. O. S. Vermeeren, and Jettie Hoonhout. "User experience white paper." Bringing clarity to the concept of user experience (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Bernd. Schmitt, "Experiential marketing." Journal of marketing management 15, no. 1--3 (1999): 53--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Multi-layered Mobile Augmented Reality Framework for Positive User Experience

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          CHIuXiD '16: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference in HCI and UX Indonesia 2016
          April 2016
          141 pages
          ISBN:9781450340441
          DOI:10.1145/2898459

          Copyright © 2016 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 13 April 2016

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate22of50submissions,44%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader