Using social network analysis to predict online contributions: the impact of network diversity in cross-cultural collaboration

ABSTRACT

Although collaborative web-based tools are often used in blended environments such as education, little research has analysed the predictive power of face-to-face social connections on measurable user behaviours in online collaboration, particularly in diverse settings. In this paper, we use Social Network Analysis to compare users' pre-existing social networks with the quantity of their contributions to an online chat-based collaborative activity in a higher education classroom. In addition, we consider whether the amount of diversity present in one's social network leads to more online contributions in an anonymous cross-cultural collaborative setting. Our findings indicate that pre-existing social connections can predict how much users contribute to online education-related collaborative activities with diverse group members, even more so than academic performance. Furthermore, our findings suggest that future Web Science research should consider how the more traditionally 'qualitative' socio-cultural influences affect user participation and use of online collaborative tools.

References

1. Schantl, J., et al., The utility of social and topical factors in anticipating repliers in Twitter conversations, in 3rd Annual ACM Web Science Conference. 2013: Paris, France.
2. Lu, D. and R. Farzan, Time to introduce myself!: Impact of self-disclosure timing of newcomers in online discussion forums, in 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference. 2015: Oxford, UK.
3. Ellison, N. B., et al., Cultivating social resources on social networking sites: Facebook relatinship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2014. 19(4): p. 855--870.
4. Moore, P. and G. Hampton, 'It's a bit of a generalisation, but...': Participant perspectives on intercultural group assessment in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 2015. 40(3): p. 390--406.
5. Hall, D. and S. Buzwell, The problem of free-riding in group projects: Looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution. Active Learning in Higher Education, 2013. 14(1): p. 37--49.
6. Strijbos, J.-W. and M. F. de Laat, Developing the role concept for computer-supported collaborative learning: An explorative synthesis. Computers in Human Behavior, 2010. 26: p. 495--505.
7. Xing, W., B. Wadholm, and S. Goggins, Learning analytics in CSCL with a focus on assessment: An exploratory study of activity theory-informed cluster analysis, in Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. 2014: Indianapolis, USA.
8. Caspi, A., P. Gorsky, and E. Chajut, The influence of group size on nonmandatory asynchronous instructional disscussion groups. Internet and Higher Education, 2003. 6: p. 227--240.
9. Capdeferro, N. and M. Romero, Are online learners frustrated with collaborative learning experiences? The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2012. 13(2): p. 26--43.
10. Popov, V., et al., Multicultural student group work in higher education: An explorative case study on challenges as perceive by students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2012. 36: p. 302--317.
11. Kimmel, K. and S. Volet, University students' perceptions of and attitudes towards culturally diverse group work: Does context matter? Journal of Studies in International Education, 2012. 16(2): p. 157--181.
12. Summers, M. and S. Volet, Students' attitudes towards culturally mixed groups on international campuses: Impact of participation in diverse and non-diverse groups. Studies in Higher Education, 2008. 33(4): p. 357--370.
13. Rienties, B., N. Johan, and D. Jindal-Snape, Bridge building potential in cross-cultural learning: A mixed method study. Asia Pacific Education Review, 2015. 16(1): p. 37--48.
14. Gasevic, D., A. Zouaq, and R. Janzen, "Choose your classmates, your GPA is at stake!": The association of cross-class social ties and academic performance. American Behavioral Scientist, 2013. 57: p. 1460--1479.
15. Skinner, C. W. and H. Beckham, Treadway Tire Company: John dissatisfaction and higher turnover at the Lima plant. Harvard Business School Brief Case 082--189, 2008.
16. Wasserman, S. and K. Faust, Social network analysis: Methods and applications. 1994, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Rienties, B., P. Alcott, and D. Jindal-Snape, To let students self-select or not: that is the question for teachers of culturally diverse groups. Journal of Studies in International Education, 2014. 18(1): p. 64--83.
18. Rienties, B., Y. Heliot, and D. Jindal-Snape, Understanding social learning relations of international students in a large classroom using social network analysis. Higher Education, 2013. 66: p. 489--504.
19. Rienties, B. and I. Kinchin, Understanding (in)formal learning in an academic development programme: A social network pespective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2014. 39: p. 123--135.
20. House, R. J., et al., Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. 2004, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Woods, P., M. Barker, and R. Hibbins, Tapping the benefits of multicultural group work: An exploratory study of postgraduate management students. International Journal of Educational Management, 2010. 9(2): p. 59--70.

Index Terms

• Applied computing

  • Education

    • Collaborative learning