skip to main content
10.1145/2909132.2909273acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaviConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Gestural Text Input Using a Smartwatch

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 June 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

One challenge with modern smartwatches is text input. In this paper we explore the use of gestural interaction with a smartwatch to support text input. The inertial measurement unit of a smartwatch is used to capture gestural interaction by a user, and an external display is used to provide feedback. We examine two specific variants of gesture keyboards: the swype keyboard common on modern smartphones and the cirrin keyboard, a gestural keyboard that supports character input via directional gestures. We show, first, that freearm gestural input as sensed by a smartwatch exhibits similar efficiency as freearm gestural input sensed by motion capture systems. As well, we show that the smartwatch inertial measurement unit can support text input on ubiquitous computing displays.

References

  1. Bi, X., Chelba, C., Ouyang, T., Partridge, K., and Zhai, S. 2012. Bimanual gesture keyboard. Proceedings of UIST 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Castellucci, S. J., and Mackenzie, I. S. 2011. Gathering text entry metrics on android devices. Extended Abstracts of CHI 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ferscha, A., Lukowicz, P., and Zambonelli, F. 2014. The superorganism of massive collective wearables. Acjunct Proceedings of UbiComp 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Funk, M., Sahami, A., Henze, N., and Schmidt, A. 2014. Using a touch-sensitive wristband for text entry on smart watches. Extended Abstracts of CHI 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hong, J., Heo, S., Isokoski, P., and Lee, G. 2015. SplitBoard. Proceedings of CHI 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. MacKenzie, I. S., and Tanaka-Ishii, K. 2007. Text entry systems: Mobility, accessibility, universality. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Mackenzie, I. S., and Soukoreff, R. W. 2003. Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques. Extended Abstracts of CHI 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mankoff, J., and Abowd, G. D. 1998. Cirrin. Proceedings UIST 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Markussen, A., Jakobsen, M. R., and Hornbæk, K. 2014. Vulture. Proceedings of CHI 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Shoemaker, G., Findlater, L., Dawson, J.Q., and Kellogg, B.S. 2009. Mid-air text input techniques for very large wall displays. Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Zhai, S., Kristensson, P. O., Gong, P., Greiner, M., Peng, S. A., Liu, L. M., and Dunnigan, A. 2009. Shapewriter on the iphone. Extended Abstracts of CHI 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    AVI '16: Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces
    June 2016
    400 pages
    ISBN:9781450341318
    DOI:10.1145/2909132

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 7 June 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    AVI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate20of96submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate107of408submissions,26%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader