ABSTRACT
Participating in interaction requires not only coordination on content and process, as previously proposed, but also on affect. The term affective grounding is introduced to refer to the coordination of affect in interaction with the purpose of building shared understanding about what behavior can be exhibited, and how behavior is interpreted emotionally and responded to. Affective Ground is achieved when interactants have reached shared understanding about how behavior should be interpreted emotionally. The paper contributes a review and critique of current perspectives on emotion in HRI. Further it outlines how research on emotion in HRI can benefit from taking an affective grounding perspective and outlines implications for the design of robots capable of participating in the coordination on affect in interaction.
- Ahn, H. S., Lee, D.-W., Choi, D., Lee, D.-Y., Hur, M., and Lee, H. (2012). Appropriate emotions for facial expressions of 33-dofs android head ever-4 h33. In RO-MAN, 2012 IEEE, pages 1115--1120. IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24(3): 452--471.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barrett, L. F. (2006). Are emotions natural kinds?. Perspectives on psychological science, 1(1), 28--58.Google Scholar
- Bennett, C. C. and Šabanović, S. (2014). Deriving minimal features for human-like facial expressions in robotic faces. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(3):367--381.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bethel,C.L., & Murphy, R. R. (2007). Non-facial/non-verbal methods of affective expression as applied to robot- assisted victim assessment. Proceedings of HRI 2007 (287--294). NY: ACM Press Google ScholarDigital Library
- Boehner, K., DePaula, R., Dourish, P., & Sengers, P. (2007). How emotion is made and measured. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(4), 275--291. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bowman, M., Debray, S. K., and Peterson, L. L. 1993. Reasoning about naming systems. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 15, 5 (Nov. 1993), 795--825. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Breazeal, C. (2003). Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(1), 119--155. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Breazeal, C.L. (2004). Designing sociable robots. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Breazeal, C. and B. Scassellati. (1999). How to build robots that make friends and influence people. Proceedings of IROS '99.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Breazeal, C., DePalma, N., Orkin, J., Chernova, S., & Jung, M. (2013). Crowdsourcing human-robot interaction: New methods and system evaluation in a public environment. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 2(1), 82--111.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Breazeal, C., Kidd, C. D., Thomaz, A. L., Hoffman, G., & Berlin, M. (2005). Effects of nonverbal communication on efficiency and robustness in human-robot teamwork. Proceedings of IROS 2005 (708--713).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bretan, M., Hoffman, G., and Weinberg, G. (2015). Emotionally expressive dynamic physical behaviors in robots. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 78:1--16. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brown, L. D., Hua, H., and Gao, C. 2003. A widget framework for augmented interaction in SCAPE. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Vancouver, Canada, November 02 - 05, 2003). UIST '03. ACM, New York, NY, 1--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chu, V., Bullard, K., & Thomaz, A. L. (2014, September). Multimodal real-time contingency detection for HRI. In 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (pp. 3327--3332). IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Clark, H. H. & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, R. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.). Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127--149). Washington, DC: APA Press.Google Scholar
- Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1--39.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Clark, M. S., Pataki, S. P., & Carver, V. H. 1996. Some thoughts and findings on self-presentation of emotions in relationships. In G. J. O. Fletcher & J. Fitness (Eds.), Knowledge structures in close relationships: A social psychological approach: 247--274). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Coan, J. A., & Gottman, J. M. (2007). The specific affect coding system (SPAFF). In J. A. Coan & J. J. B. Allen (Eds.) Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment. (106--123). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Costa, S., Soares, F., and Santos, C. (2013). Facial expressions and gestures to convey emotions with a humanoid robot. In Social Robotics, pages 542--551. Springer. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2009). On combining clauses and actions in interaction. Virittäjä, 113(3).Google Scholar
- Curhan, J. R., & Pentland, A. (2007). Thin slices of negotiation: predicting outcomes from conversational dynamics within the first 5 minutes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 802.ÅGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Damm, O., Dreier, K., Hegel, F., Jaecks, P., Stenneken, P., Wrede, B., & Hielscher-Fastabend, M. (2011, January). Communicating emotions in robotics: Towards a model of emotional alignment. In Proceedings of the workshop "Expectations in intuitive interaction" on the 6th HRI International conference on Human-Robot Interaction.Google Scholar
- Ding, W. and Marchionini, G. 1997. A Study on Video Browsing Strategies. Technical Report. University of Maryland at College Park. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Driver, J. L., & Gottman, J. M. 2004. Daily marital interactions and positive affect during marital conflict among newlywed couples. Family Processes, 43(3): 301--314.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ekman, P. (1984). Expression and the nature of emotion. In P. Ekman & K. Scherer (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 319--343). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., O'Sullivan, M., Chan, A., Diacoyanni-Tarlatzis, I., Heider, K., ... & Scherer, K. (1987). Universals and cultural differences in the judgments of facial expressions of emotion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 53(4), 712.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ekman. P. (1993). Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist, 48, 384--392.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1977). Facial action coding system.Google Scholar
- Fernández-Dols, J.-M., Sanchez, F. , Carrera, P., Ruiz-Belda, M.-A. (1997) Are spontaneous expressions and emotions linked? An experimental test of coherence, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, vol. 31, pp. 163--177.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fincannon, T., Barnes, L. E., Murphy, R. R., & Riddle, D. L. (2004). Evidence of the need for social intelligence in rescue robots. Proceedings of IROS 2004. (pp. 1089--1095). IEEE/RSJ 2.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. 2008. Social functions of emotion. In Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J. M., and Barrett, L. F. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions, (3rd ed.): 456--468. New York, NY: The Guilford PressGoogle Scholar
- Forman, G. 2003. An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3 (Mar. 2003), 1289--1305. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fröhlich, B. and Plate, J. 2000. The cubic mouse: a new device for three-dimensional input. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (The Hague, The Netherlands, April 01 - 06, 2000). CHI '00. ACM, New York, NY, 526--531. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Giese-Davis, J., Spiegel, D., (2003) Emotional expression and cancer progression. Handbook of affective sciences. (pp. 1053--1082). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gockley, R., Simmons, R., and Forlizzi, J. (2006). Modeling affect in socially interactive robots. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2006. ROMAN 2006. The 15th IEEE Inter- national Symposium on, pages 558--563. IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Goffman, E. (1961). Fun in games. Encounters, 15--81.Google Scholar
- Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (2000). Emotion within situated activity. Communication: An arena of development, 33--53.Google Scholar
- Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of personality and social psychology, 63(2), 221.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology 2, 271--299.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gross, J. J. (2013). Emotion regulation: taking stock and moving forward. Emotion, 13(3), 359.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hiolle, A., Lewis, M., & Cañamero, L. (2014). Arousal regulation and affective adaptation to human responsiveness by a robot that explores and learns a novel environment. Frontiers in neurorobotics, 8.Google Scholar
- Hochschild, A. R. (2003). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Univ of California Press.Google Scholar
- Horney, K. (1945). Our inner conflicts. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- Hoque, M. E., McDuff, D. J., & Picard, R. W. (2012). Exploring temporal patterns in classifying frustrated and delighted smiles. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 3(3), 323--334. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jefferson, G.,;Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. (1987). Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. Button, G. (Ed); Lee, J. R. E. (Ed). . Talk and social organisation., (pp. 152--205). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters, 335 pp.Google Scholar
- Jung, M., Chong, J., & Leifer, L. (2012). Group hedonic balance and pair programming performance: a ective interaction dynamics as indicators of performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 829--838). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jung, M. F. (2016). Coupling Interactions and Performance: Predicting Team Performance from Thin Slices of Conflict. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 23(3), 18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jung, M. F., Lee, J. J., DePalma, N., Adalgeirsson, S. O., Hinds, P. J., & Breazeal, C. (2013, February). Engaging robots: easing complex human-robot teamwork using backchanneling. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 1555--1566). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jung, M. F., Martelaro, N., & Hinds, P. J. (2015). Using robots to moderate team conflict: the case of repairing violations. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 229--236). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kaindl, H., Popp, R., Raneburger, D., Ertl, D., Falb, J., Szep, A., & Bogdan, C. (2011). Robot-supported cooperative work: A shared-shopping scenario. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 1--10). IEEE. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Karg, M., Schwimmbeck, M., Kuhnlenz, K., and Buss, M. (2010). Towards mapping emotive gait patterns from human to robot. In RO-MAN, 2010 IEEE, pages 258--263. IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kedzierski, J., Muszynški, R., Zoll, C., Oleksy, A., and Frontkiewicz, M. (2013). Emys--emotive head of a social robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(2):237--249.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. 1999. Social Functions of Emotions at Four Levels of Analysis. Cognition & Emotion, 13(5): 505--521.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kirstein, F., Fischer, K., Erkent, Ö., & Piater, J. (2015). Human smile distinguishes between collaborative and solitary tasks in human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of HRI 2015. (pp. 145--146). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kishi, T., Kojima, T., Endo, N., Destephe, M., Otani, T., Jamone, L., Kryczka, P., Trovato, G., Hashimoto, K., Cosentino, S., et al. (2013). Impression survey of the emotion expression hu- manoid robot with mental model based dynamic emotions. In Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2013 IEEE International Conference on, pages 1663--1668. IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Knight, H. and Simmons, R. (2014). Expressive motion with x, y and theta: Laban effort features for mobile robots. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2014 RO-MAN: The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on, pages 267--273. IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kraut, R. E., & Johnston, R. E. (1979). Social and emotional messages of smiling: An ethological approach. Journal of personality and social psychology, 37(9), 1539.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Leahu, L., & Sengers, P. (2014, June). Freaky: performing hybrid human-machine emotion. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (pp. 607--616). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Levenson, R. W., Carstensen, L. L., & Gottman, J. M. 1994. Influence of age and gender on affect, physiology, and their interrelations: A study of long-term marriages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(1): 56--68.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Levenson, R. W., & Gottman, J. M. 1985. Physiological and affective predictors of change in relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1): 85--94.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lewis, M., & Canamero, L. (2014, August). An affective autonomous robot toddler to support the development of self-efficacy in diabetic children. In The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lütkebohle, I., Hegel, F., Schulz, S., Hackel, M., Wrede, B., Wachsmuth, S., and Sagerer, G. (2010). The bielefeld anthropomorphic robot head "flobi". In Robotics and Automation, 2010. ICRA 2010. Proceedings IEEE International Conference on, volume 3(7), pages 3384--3391.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Masuda, M. and Kato, S. (2010). Motion rendering system for emotion expression of human form robots based on laban movement analysis. In RO-MAN, 2010 IEEE, pages 324--329. IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Morris, M. W., & Keltner, D. 2000. How emotions work: The social functions of emotional expression in negotiations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22: 1--50.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Murphy, R. R., Lisetti, C. L., Tardif, R., Irish, L., & Gage, A. (2002). Emotion-based control of cooperating heterogeneous mobile robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 18(5), 744--757.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mutlu, B., Shiwa, T., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N. (2009). Footing in human-robot conversations: how robots might shape participant roles using gaze cues. Proceedings of HRI 2009 (61--68). NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pasupathi, M., Carstensen, L. L., Levenson, R. W., & Gottman, J. M. (1999). Responsive listening in long-married couples: A psycholinguistic perspective. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 23(2), 173--193.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Perakyla, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2012). Facial Expression and Interactional Regulation of Emotion. Emotion in interaction, ed. A Perakyla, M Sorjonen, 64--91.Google Scholar
- Reeck, C., Ames, D. R., & Ochsner, K. N. (2016). The social regulation of emotion: An integrative, cross-disciplinary model. Trends in cognitive sciences, 20(1), 47--63.Google Scholar
- Rich, C., Ponsler, B., Holroyd, A., & Sidner, C. L. (2010, March). Recognizing engagement in human-robot interaction. In 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 375--382). IEEE. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rimé, B. (2007). Interpersonal emotion regulation. Handbook of emotion regulation, 1, 466--468.Google Scholar
- Rose, R., Scheutz, M, and Schermerhorn, P. (2008). Empirical investigations into the believability of robot affect. Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium.Google Scholar
- Rosenberg, E. L., Ekman, P. (1994) Coherence between expressive and experiential systems in emotion," Cognition and Emotion, vol. 8, pp. 201--229.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ruusuvuori, J. (2013). Emotion, affect and conversation. The handbook of conversation analysis, 330--349.Google Scholar
- Russell, J. A. (1978). Evidence of convergent validity on the dimensions of affect. Journal of personality and social psychology, 36(10), 1152.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: dissecting the elephant. Journal of personality and social psychology, 76(5), 805.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. language, 696--735.Google Scholar
- Sannella, M. J. 1994. Constraint Satisfaction and Debugging for Interactive User Interfaces. Doctoral Thesis. UMI Order Number: UMI Order No. GAX95-09398., University of Washington. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schegloff, E. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: Volume 1: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Scheutz, M., Schermerhorn, P., & Kramer, J. (2006). The utility of affect expression in natural language interactions in joint human-robot tasks. In Proceedings of HRI 2006 (226--233). NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Selting, M. (1994). Emphatic speech style mdash; with special focus on the prosodic signalling of heightened emotive involvement in conversation. Journal of pragmatics, 22(3), 375--408.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sharma, M., Hildebrandt, D., Newman, G., Young, J. E., and Eskicioglu, R. (2013). Communicating affect via flight path exploring use of the laban effort system for designing affective locomotion paths. In Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on, pages 293--300. IEEE. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shibata, H., Kano, M., Kato, S., and Itoh, H. (2006). A system for converting robot 'emotion' into facial expressions. In Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006. Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on, pages 3660--3665. IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Spector, A. Z. 1989. Achieving application requirements. In Distributed Systems, S. Mullender, Ed. ACM Press Frontier Series. ACM, New York, NY, 19--33. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tavel, P. 2007. Modeling and Simulation Design. AK Peters Ltd., Natick, MA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomaz, A., Hoffman, G., Cakmak, M., (In Press) Computational Human-Robot Interaction. Foundations and Trends in Human Computer Interaction.Google Scholar
- Tielman, M., Neerincx, M., Meyer, J. J., & Looije, R. (2014, March). Adaptive emotional expression in robot-child interaction. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction (pp. 407--414). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Van Kleef, G. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life the emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current directions in psychological science, 18(3): 184--188.Google Scholar
- Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K., & Manstead, A. S. (2010). An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: The emotions as social information model. In Mark P. Zanna, editor: Advances in experimental social psychology, 42, 45--96.Google Scholar
- Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. 1985. Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2): 219--235.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (2006). Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social psychology quarterly, 69(2), 150--182.Google Scholar
- Xu, J.,Broekens, J., Hindriks, K., and Neerincx, M. A. (2015). Mood contagion of robot body language in human robot interaction. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 29, 6. 1216--1248. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yu, Y. T. and Lau, M. F. 2006. A comparison of MC/DC, MUMCUT and several other coverage criteria for logical decisions. J. Syst. Softw. 79, 5 (May. 2006), 577--590. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zaki, J., & Williams, W. C. (2013). Interpersonal emotion regulation. Emotion, 13(5), 803.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zhang, J. and Sharkey, A. J. (2011). Listening to sad music while seeing a happy robot face. In Social Robotics, pages 173--182. Springer. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ziemke, T., & Lowe, R. (2009). On the role of emotion in embodied cognitive architectures: From organisms to robots. Cognitive computation, 1(1), 104--117.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Affective Grounding in Human-Robot Interaction
Recommendations
The Future of Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction
CHI EA '22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsEmotion has been studied in HCI for two decades, with specific traditions interested in sensing, expressing, transmitting, modelling, experiencing, visualizing, understanding, constructing, regulating, manipulating or adapting to emotion in human-human ...
“Instant Happiness”: Smartphones as tools for everyday emotion regulation
Highlights- We investigated smartphone-based emotion regulation in daily life and its associated psychological consequences using experience sampling and qualitative ...
AbstractSmartphone use has become an indispensable aspect of daily life for billions of people. Increasingly, researchers are examining the impact of smartphone use upon psychological well-being. However, little research has investigated how ...
Affective guidance of intelligent agents: How emotion controls cognition
How do emotions and moods color cognition? In this article, we examine how such reactions influence both judgments and cognitive performance. We argue that many affective influences are due, not to affective reactions themselves, but to the information ...
Comments