skip to main content
10.1145/2909824.3020224acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Affective Grounding in Human-Robot Interaction

Published:06 March 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Participating in interaction requires not only coordination on content and process, as previously proposed, but also on affect. The term affective grounding is introduced to refer to the coordination of affect in interaction with the purpose of building shared understanding about what behavior can be exhibited, and how behavior is interpreted emotionally and responded to. Affective Ground is achieved when interactants have reached shared understanding about how behavior should be interpreted emotionally. The paper contributes a review and critique of current perspectives on emotion in HRI. Further it outlines how research on emotion in HRI can benefit from taking an affective grounding perspective and outlines implications for the design of robots capable of participating in the coordination on affect in interaction.

References

  1. Ahn, H. S., Lee, D.-W., Choi, D., Lee, D.-Y., Hur, M., and Lee, H. (2012). Appropriate emotions for facial expressions of 33-dofs android head ever-4 h33. In RO-MAN, 2012 IEEE, pages 1115--1120. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24(3): 452--471.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Barrett, L. F. (2006). Are emotions natural kinds?. Perspectives on psychological science, 1(1), 28--58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, C. C. and Šabanović, S. (2014). Deriving minimal features for human-like facial expressions in robotic faces. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(3):367--381.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bethel,C.L., & Murphy, R. R. (2007). Non-facial/non-verbal methods of affective expression as applied to robot- assisted victim assessment. Proceedings of HRI 2007 (287--294). NY: ACM Press Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Boehner, K., DePaula, R., Dourish, P., & Sengers, P. (2007). How emotion is made and measured. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(4), 275--291. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bowman, M., Debray, S. K., and Peterson, L. L. 1993. Reasoning about naming systems. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 15, 5 (Nov. 1993), 795--825. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Breazeal, C. (2003). Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(1), 119--155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Breazeal, C.L. (2004). Designing sociable robots. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Breazeal, C. and B. Scassellati. (1999). How to build robots that make friends and influence people. Proceedings of IROS '99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Breazeal, C., DePalma, N., Orkin, J., Chernova, S., & Jung, M. (2013). Crowdsourcing human-robot interaction: New methods and system evaluation in a public environment. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 2(1), 82--111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Breazeal, C., Kidd, C. D., Thomaz, A. L., Hoffman, G., & Berlin, M. (2005). Effects of nonverbal communication on efficiency and robustness in human-robot teamwork. Proceedings of IROS 2005 (708--713).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Bretan, M., Hoffman, G., and Weinberg, G. (2015). Emotionally expressive dynamic physical behaviors in robots. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 78:1--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Brown, L. D., Hua, H., and Gao, C. 2003. A widget framework for augmented interaction in SCAPE. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Vancouver, Canada, November 02 - 05, 2003). UIST '03. ACM, New York, NY, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Chu, V., Bullard, K., & Thomaz, A. L. (2014, September). Multimodal real-time contingency detection for HRI. In 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (pp. 3327--3332). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Clark, H. H. & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, R. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.). Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127--149). Washington, DC: APA Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Clark, M. S., Pataki, S. P., & Carver, V. H. 1996. Some thoughts and findings on self-presentation of emotions in relationships. In G. J. O. Fletcher & J. Fitness (Eds.), Knowledge structures in close relationships: A social psychological approach: 247--274). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Coan, J. A., & Gottman, J. M. (2007). The specific affect coding system (SPAFF). In J. A. Coan & J. J. B. Allen (Eds.) Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment. (106--123). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Costa, S., Soares, F., and Santos, C. (2013). Facial expressions and gestures to convey emotions with a humanoid robot. In Social Robotics, pages 542--551. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2009). On combining clauses and actions in interaction. Virittäjä, 113(3).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Curhan, J. R., & Pentland, A. (2007). Thin slices of negotiation: predicting outcomes from conversational dynamics within the first 5 minutes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 802.ÅGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Damm, O., Dreier, K., Hegel, F., Jaecks, P., Stenneken, P., Wrede, B., & Hielscher-Fastabend, M. (2011, January). Communicating emotions in robotics: Towards a model of emotional alignment. In Proceedings of the workshop "Expectations in intuitive interaction" on the 6th HRI International conference on Human-Robot Interaction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Ding, W. and Marchionini, G. 1997. A Study on Video Browsing Strategies. Technical Report. University of Maryland at College Park. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Driver, J. L., & Gottman, J. M. 2004. Daily marital interactions and positive affect during marital conflict among newlywed couples. Family Processes, 43(3): 301--314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Ekman, P. (1984). Expression and the nature of emotion. In P. Ekman & K. Scherer (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 319--343). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., O'Sullivan, M., Chan, A., Diacoyanni-Tarlatzis, I., Heider, K., ... & Scherer, K. (1987). Universals and cultural differences in the judgments of facial expressions of emotion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 53(4), 712.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Ekman. P. (1993). Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist, 48, 384--392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1977). Facial action coding system.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Fernández-Dols, J.-M., Sanchez, F. , Carrera, P., Ruiz-Belda, M.-A. (1997) Are spontaneous expressions and emotions linked? An experimental test of coherence, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, vol. 31, pp. 163--177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Fincannon, T., Barnes, L. E., Murphy, R. R., & Riddle, D. L. (2004). Evidence of the need for social intelligence in rescue robots. Proceedings of IROS 2004. (pp. 1089--1095). IEEE/RSJ 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. 2008. Social functions of emotion. In Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J. M., and Barrett, L. F. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions, (3rd ed.): 456--468. New York, NY: The Guilford PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Forman, G. 2003. An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3 (Mar. 2003), 1289--1305. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Fröhlich, B. and Plate, J. 2000. The cubic mouse: a new device for three-dimensional input. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (The Hague, The Netherlands, April 01 - 06, 2000). CHI '00. ACM, New York, NY, 526--531. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Giese-Davis, J., Spiegel, D., (2003) Emotional expression and cancer progression. Handbook of affective sciences. (pp. 1053--1082). New York: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Gockley, R., Simmons, R., and Forlizzi, J. (2006). Modeling affect in socially interactive robots. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2006. ROMAN 2006. The 15th IEEE Inter- national Symposium on, pages 558--563. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Goffman, E. (1961). Fun in games. Encounters, 15--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (2000). Emotion within situated activity. Communication: An arena of development, 33--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of personality and social psychology, 63(2), 221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology 2, 271--299.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Gross, J. J. (2013). Emotion regulation: taking stock and moving forward. Emotion, 13(3), 359.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Hiolle, A., Lewis, M., & Cañamero, L. (2014). Arousal regulation and affective adaptation to human responsiveness by a robot that explores and learns a novel environment. Frontiers in neurorobotics, 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Hochschild, A. R. (2003). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Univ of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Horney, K. (1945). Our inner conflicts. New York: Norton.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Hoque, M. E., McDuff, D. J., & Picard, R. W. (2012). Exploring temporal patterns in classifying frustrated and delighted smiles. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 3(3), 323--334. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Jefferson, G.,;Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. (1987). Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. Button, G. (Ed); Lee, J. R. E. (Ed). . Talk and social organisation., (pp. 152--205). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters, 335 pp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Jung, M., Chong, J., & Leifer, L. (2012). Group hedonic balance and pair programming performance: a ective interaction dynamics as indicators of performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 829--838). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Jung, M. F. (2016). Coupling Interactions and Performance: Predicting Team Performance from Thin Slices of Conflict. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 23(3), 18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Jung, M. F., Lee, J. J., DePalma, N., Adalgeirsson, S. O., Hinds, P. J., & Breazeal, C. (2013, February). Engaging robots: easing complex human-robot teamwork using backchanneling. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 1555--1566). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Jung, M. F., Martelaro, N., & Hinds, P. J. (2015). Using robots to moderate team conflict: the case of repairing violations. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 229--236). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Kaindl, H., Popp, R., Raneburger, D., Ertl, D., Falb, J., Szep, A., & Bogdan, C. (2011). Robot-supported cooperative work: A shared-shopping scenario. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 1--10). IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Karg, M., Schwimmbeck, M., Kuhnlenz, K., and Buss, M. (2010). Towards mapping emotive gait patterns from human to robot. In RO-MAN, 2010 IEEE, pages 258--263. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Kedzierski, J., Muszynški, R., Zoll, C., Oleksy, A., and Frontkiewicz, M. (2013). Emys--emotive head of a social robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(2):237--249.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. 1999. Social Functions of Emotions at Four Levels of Analysis. Cognition & Emotion, 13(5): 505--521.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Kirstein, F., Fischer, K., Erkent, Ö., & Piater, J. (2015). Human smile distinguishes between collaborative and solitary tasks in human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of HRI 2015. (pp. 145--146). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Kishi, T., Kojima, T., Endo, N., Destephe, M., Otani, T., Jamone, L., Kryczka, P., Trovato, G., Hashimoto, K., Cosentino, S., et al. (2013). Impression survey of the emotion expression hu- manoid robot with mental model based dynamic emotions. In Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2013 IEEE International Conference on, pages 1663--1668. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Knight, H. and Simmons, R. (2014). Expressive motion with x, y and theta: Laban effort features for mobile robots. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2014 RO-MAN: The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on, pages 267--273. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Kraut, R. E., & Johnston, R. E. (1979). Social and emotional messages of smiling: An ethological approach. Journal of personality and social psychology, 37(9), 1539.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Leahu, L., & Sengers, P. (2014, June). Freaky: performing hybrid human-machine emotion. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (pp. 607--616). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Levenson, R. W., Carstensen, L. L., & Gottman, J. M. 1994. Influence of age and gender on affect, physiology, and their interrelations: A study of long-term marriages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(1): 56--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Levenson, R. W., & Gottman, J. M. 1985. Physiological and affective predictors of change in relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1): 85--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Lewis, M., & Canamero, L. (2014, August). An affective autonomous robot toddler to support the development of self-efficacy in diabetic children. In The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Lütkebohle, I., Hegel, F., Schulz, S., Hackel, M., Wrede, B., Wachsmuth, S., and Sagerer, G. (2010). The bielefeld anthropomorphic robot head "flobi". In Robotics and Automation, 2010. ICRA 2010. Proceedings IEEE International Conference on, volume 3(7), pages 3384--3391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Masuda, M. and Kato, S. (2010). Motion rendering system for emotion expression of human form robots based on laban movement analysis. In RO-MAN, 2010 IEEE, pages 324--329. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Morris, M. W., & Keltner, D. 2000. How emotions work: The social functions of emotional expression in negotiations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22: 1--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Murphy, R. R., Lisetti, C. L., Tardif, R., Irish, L., & Gage, A. (2002). Emotion-based control of cooperating heterogeneous mobile robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 18(5), 744--757.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Mutlu, B., Shiwa, T., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N. (2009). Footing in human-robot conversations: how robots might shape participant roles using gaze cues. Proceedings of HRI 2009 (61--68). NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Pasupathi, M., Carstensen, L. L., Levenson, R. W., & Gottman, J. M. (1999). Responsive listening in long-married couples: A psycholinguistic perspective. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 23(2), 173--193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Perakyla, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2012). Facial Expression and Interactional Regulation of Emotion. Emotion in interaction, ed. A Perakyla, M Sorjonen, 64--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Reeck, C., Ames, D. R., & Ochsner, K. N. (2016). The social regulation of emotion: An integrative, cross-disciplinary model. Trends in cognitive sciences, 20(1), 47--63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Rich, C., Ponsler, B., Holroyd, A., & Sidner, C. L. (2010, March). Recognizing engagement in human-robot interaction. In 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 375--382). IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Rimé, B. (2007). Interpersonal emotion regulation. Handbook of emotion regulation, 1, 466--468.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Rose, R., Scheutz, M, and Schermerhorn, P. (2008). Empirical investigations into the believability of robot affect. Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Rosenberg, E. L., Ekman, P. (1994) Coherence between expressive and experiential systems in emotion," Cognition and Emotion, vol. 8, pp. 201--229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Ruusuvuori, J. (2013). Emotion, affect and conversation. The handbook of conversation analysis, 330--349.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Russell, J. A. (1978). Evidence of convergent validity on the dimensions of affect. Journal of personality and social psychology, 36(10), 1152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: dissecting the elephant. Journal of personality and social psychology, 76(5), 805.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. language, 696--735.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Sannella, M. J. 1994. Constraint Satisfaction and Debugging for Interactive User Interfaces. Doctoral Thesis. UMI Order Number: UMI Order No. GAX95-09398., University of Washington. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Schegloff, E. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: Volume 1: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Scheutz, M., Schermerhorn, P., & Kramer, J. (2006). The utility of affect expression in natural language interactions in joint human-robot tasks. In Proceedings of HRI 2006 (226--233). NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Selting, M. (1994). Emphatic speech style mdash; with special focus on the prosodic signalling of heightened emotive involvement in conversation. Journal of pragmatics, 22(3), 375--408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Sharma, M., Hildebrandt, D., Newman, G., Young, J. E., and Eskicioglu, R. (2013). Communicating affect via flight path exploring use of the laban effort system for designing affective locomotion paths. In Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on, pages 293--300. IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Shibata, H., Kano, M., Kato, S., and Itoh, H. (2006). A system for converting robot 'emotion' into facial expressions. In Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006. Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on, pages 3660--3665. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. Spector, A. Z. 1989. Achieving application requirements. In Distributed Systems, S. Mullender, Ed. ACM Press Frontier Series. ACM, New York, NY, 19--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Tavel, P. 2007. Modeling and Simulation Design. AK Peters Ltd., Natick, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. Thomaz, A., Hoffman, G., Cakmak, M., (In Press) Computational Human-Robot Interaction. Foundations and Trends in Human Computer Interaction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Tielman, M., Neerincx, M., Meyer, J. J., & Looije, R. (2014, March). Adaptive emotional expression in robot-child interaction. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction (pp. 407--414). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. Van Kleef, G. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life the emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current directions in psychological science, 18(3): 184--188.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K., & Manstead, A. S. (2010). An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: The emotions as social information model. In Mark P. Zanna, editor: Advances in experimental social psychology, 42, 45--96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. 1985. Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2): 219--235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  92. Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (2006). Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social psychology quarterly, 69(2), 150--182.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. Xu, J.,Broekens, J., Hindriks, K., and Neerincx, M. A. (2015). Mood contagion of robot body language in human robot interaction. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 29, 6. 1216--1248. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  94. Yu, Y. T. and Lau, M. F. 2006. A comparison of MC/DC, MUMCUT and several other coverage criteria for logical decisions. J. Syst. Softw. 79, 5 (May. 2006), 577--590. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  95. Zaki, J., & Williams, W. C. (2013). Interpersonal emotion regulation. Emotion, 13(5), 803.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. Zhang, J. and Sharkey, A. J. (2011). Listening to sad music while seeing a happy robot face. In Social Robotics, pages 173--182. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. Ziemke, T., & Lowe, R. (2009). On the role of emotion in embodied cognitive architectures: From organisms to robots. Cognitive computation, 1(1), 104--117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Affective Grounding in Human-Robot Interaction

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        HRI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
        March 2017
        510 pages
        ISBN:9781450343367
        DOI:10.1145/2909824

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 March 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        HRI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate51of211submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader