Abstract
The Imitation Game that was presented by Turing back in the 1950s was an important experiment whose purpose was to provide a basic platform for the question of whether a computer can think. Over the years other views were raised that presented weaknesses of and claims against Turing's test, and some alternative tests were even proposed and recently there is a claim that a program already passes Turing Test. The ability to interface with a huge amount of data from a variety of public resources over the internet creates new functionalities and capabilities that may allow updating of the test rules, modifying them (based on examples, that at least part of them are already implemented) and also changing the scope of the question from whether a computer can think to how relevant the answer is to the requester.
- Bringsjord, S., Bello, P., & Ferrucci, D. (2001, February). Creativity, the turing test, and the (better) lovelace test. Minds Mach., 11(1), 3--27. doi: 10.1023/A:1011206622741 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Feigenbaum, E. A. (2003, January). Some challenges and grand challenges for computational intelligence. J. ACM, 50(1), 32--40. doi: 10.1145/602382.602400 Google ScholarDigital Library
- French, R. M. (1990, January). Subcognition and the limits of the turing test. Mind, 99(393), 53--66.Google ScholarCross Ref
- French, R. M. (2012, December). Moving beyond the turing test. Commun. ACM, 55(12), 74--77. doi: 10.1145/2380656.2380674 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hodges, A. (1997). Alan turing: A natural philosopher. Phoenix, London.Google Scholar
- Muggleton, S. (2014, January). Alan turing and the development of artificial intelligence. AI Commun., 27(1), 3--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sample, I., & Hern, A. (2014, June). Scientists dispute whether computer 'eugene goostman' passed turing test. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/09/scientists-disagree-over-whether-turing-test-has-been-passed.Google Scholar
- Saygin, A. P., & Cicekli, I. (2000). Turing test: 50 years later. Minds and Machines, 10(4), 463--518. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Searle, J. (2011, February). Watson doesn't know it won on 'jeopardy!'. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703407304576154313126987674.Google Scholar
- Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417--424.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shieber, S. M. (1994, June). Lessons from a restricted Turing test. Commun. ACM, 37(6), 70--78. doi: 10.1145/175208.175217 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433--460.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vardi, M. Y. (2014, September). Would Turing have passed the turing test? Commun. ACM, 57(9), 5. doi: 10.1145/2643596 Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
At-speed Test of High-Speed DUT Using Built-Off Test Interface
ATS '10: Proceedings of the 2010 19th IEEE Asian Test SymposiumThis paper presents an efficient test framework to extend a use of low-cost ATE (Automatic Test Equipment) to at-speed test of high-speed DUT (Device Under Test). To bridge the speed gap between the ATE and the DUT, an off-chip test interface circuit, ...
Fine-grained test minimization
ICSE '18: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software EngineeringAs a software system evolves, its test suite can accumulate redundancies over time. Test minimization aims at removing redundant test cases. However, current techniques remove whole test cases from the test suite using test adequacy criteria, such as ...
Improving Fault Detection Capability by Selectively Retaining Test Cases during Test Suite Reduction
Software testing is a critical part of software development. As new test cases are generated over time due to software modifications, test suite sizes may grow significantly. Because of time and resource constraints for testing, test suite minimization ...
Comments