skip to main content
10.1145/2930674.2935982acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Design Implications for a User Study on a Tangible Tabletop

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 June 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents some implications about designing a collaborative problem solving task on a tangible user interface (TUI) for gesture analysis. We present our initial work within the European Horizon 2020 Marie Curie project Gestures in Tangible User Interfaces (GETUI). This project involves mainly creating a gesture taxonomy used in relation to a tangible tabletop. A preliminary user study showed that gesturing encourages the use of epistemic actions by lowering cognitive load. Our current user studies will enhance 21st Century skills and provide insights about the impact of gestures on collaboration, while also identify cultural differences of gestures.

References

  1. Dimitra Anastasiou. 2011. Speech Recognition, Machine Translation and Gesture Localisation. TRALOGY: Translation Careers and Technologies: Convergence Points for the Future, 3-4 March, Paris, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Dimitra Anastasiou, Valérie Maquil, Eric Ras. 2014. Gesture Analysis in a Case Study with a Tangible User Interface for Collaborative Problem Solving. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. John Brooke. 1986. SUS: a "quick and dirty" usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, London: Taylor and Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Susan Wagner Cook, Zachary Mitchell, Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2008. Gesturing Makes Learning Last. Cognition 106, 2, 1047--1058.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. David Efron. 1941. Gesture and environment, King's Crown Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2004. Gesture's role in the learning process. Theory into Practice 43, 4, 314--321.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Samuel Greiff, Sascha Wüstenberg, Joachim Funke. 2012. Dynamic Problem Solving: A new measurement perspective. Applied Psychological Measurement 36, 3, 189--213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Sandra. G. Hart. 2006. NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later. Proc. of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting, HFES, 904--908.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Maria Karam, m. c.schraefel. 2005. A Taxonomy of Gestures in Human Computer Interactions, Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sotaro Kita. 2009. Cross-cultural variation of speech-accompanying gesture: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes 24, 2, 145--167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. David McNeill. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about though, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Meredith R. Morris et al. 2006. Cooperative gestures: multi-user gestural interactions for co-located groupware. Proc. of CHI 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Christiane Moser, Manfred Tscheligi. 2015. Physics-based gaming: exploring touch vs. mid-air gesture input. Proc. of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 291--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Dominic Orr, Michelle Rimini, Dirk van Damme. 2015. OECD Fostering new forms of learning for the 21st century. Open Educational Resources: A Catalyst for Innovation, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Quek Francis. 1994. Toward a vision-based hand gesture interface. Proc. of the virtual reality, software and technology conference, 17--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Eric Ras et al. 2013. Empirical studies on a Tangible user interface for technology-based assessment: Insights and emerging challenges. International Journal of e-Assessment 3, 1, 201--241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Wolff-Michael Roth. 2001. Gestures: Their role in teaching and learning. Review of Educational Research 71, 365--392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Glenda Revelle et al. 2005. Tangible User Interfaces for Children. Proc. CHI 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Marie-Monique Schaper, Laura Malinverni, Narcis Pares. 2015. Sketching through the body: Child-generated gestures in Full-Body Interaction Design. Proc. of the 14th IDC Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Anthony Tang et al. 2006. Collaborative coupling over Tabletop Displays. Proc. of CHI 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Eric Tobias, Valérie Maquil, Thibaud Latour. 2015. TULIP: A widget-based software framework for tangible tabletop interfaces. Proc. of the 7th ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems, 216--221. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Brygg Ullmer, Hiroshi Ishii. 2000. Emerging Frameworks for Tangible User Interfaces. IBM Syst. J. 39, 3-4, 915--931. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Peter Wittenburg et al. 2006. ELAN: a professional framework for multimodality research. Proc. of the 5th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 1556--1559.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Lesley Xie, Alissa N. Antle, Nima Motamedi. 2008. Are tangibles more fun? Comparing children's enjoyment and engagement using physical, graphical and tangible user interfaces. Proc. of TEI 2008, 191--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Design Implications for a User Study on a Tangible Tabletop

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          IDC '16: Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children
          June 2016
          774 pages
          ISBN:9781450343138
          DOI:10.1145/2930674

          Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 21 June 2016

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • extended-abstract
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          IDC '16 Paper Acceptance Rate36of77submissions,47%Overall Acceptance Rate172of578submissions,30%

          Upcoming Conference

          IDC '24
          Interaction Design and Children
          June 17 - 20, 2024
          Delft , Netherlands

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader