skip to main content
10.1145/2933242.2948129acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseicsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Workshop on engineering human-computer interaction in recommender systems

Published:21 June 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recommender systems support users in exploring items that would be interesting for them, building an internal representation of the current user according her explicit feedback on the items. Such preferences express only extreme ratings, and exploiting implicit feedback is still a challenge. Different solutions exist in literature, but a general one is still lacking. Similarly, the user interface engineering community elaborated patterns and metaphors for supporting users in both inspecting and controlling the internal state of intelligent systems in different domains. The aim of this workshop is to solicit the collaboration between recommendation and user interface experts, in order to discuss novel ideas for engineering the interaction with Recommenders Systems. This workshop solicits contributions in all topics related to engineering Human-Computer Interaction in Recommender Systems, for collecting novel ideas in this field and connecting different researchers and practitioners working in this area.

References

  1. Svetlin Bostandjiev, John O'Donovan, and Tobias Höllerer. 2012. TasteWeights: A Visual Interactive Hybrid Recommender System. In Proceedings of the Sixth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 35--42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2365952.2365964 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Paolo Cremonesi, Franca Garzottto, and Roberto Turrin. 2012. User Effort vs. Accuracy in Rating-based Elicitation. In Proceedings of the Sixth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 27--34. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2365952.2365963 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. B. J. Fogg. 2002. Persuasive Technology. Using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Elsevier, San Francisco. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bart P. Knijnenburg, Niels J. M. Reijmer, and Martijn C. Willemsen. 2011. Each to His Own: How Different Users Call for Different Interaction Methods in Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 141--148. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2043932.2043960 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Joseph A. Konstan. 2011. Tutorial / HCI for Recommender Systems: A Tutorial. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 463--. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1943403.1943501 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Clifford Nass and Youngme Moon. 2000. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues 56 (2000), 81--103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hien Nguyen, Judith Masthoff, and Pete Edwards. 2007. Persuasive Effects of Embodied Conversational Agent Teams. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction: Intelligent Multimodal Interaction Environments (HCI'07). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 176--185. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1769590.1769610 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Pearl Pu and Li Chen. 2007. Trust-inspiring Explanation Interfaces for Recommender Systems. Know.-Based Syst. 20, 6 (Aug. 2007), 542--556. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2007.04.004 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Pearl Pu, Li Chen, and Rong Hu. 2011. A User-centric Evaluation Framework for Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 157--164. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2043932.2043962 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Lingyun Qiu. 2010. Designing social interactions with animated avatars and speech output for Product Recommendation Agents in electronic commerce. Ph.D. Dissertation. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0092949 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Byron Reeves and Clifford Nass. 1996. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. E. Isaac Sparling and Shilad Sen. 2011. Rating: How Difficult is It?. In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 149--156. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2043932.2043961 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Workshop on engineering human-computer interaction in recommender systems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      EICS '16: Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems
      June 2016
      321 pages
      ISBN:9781450343220
      DOI:10.1145/2933242

      Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 June 2016

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • extended-abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate73of299submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      EICS '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader