skip to main content
10.1145/2933267.2933296acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdebsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration

Complex event processing for the non-expert with autoCEP: demo

Published:13 June 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

The inference mechanisms of CEP engines are completely guided by rules, which are specified manually by domain experts. We argue that this user-based rule specification is a limiting factor, as it requires the experts to have technical knowledge about the CEP language they want to use, it restricts the usage of CEP to merely the detection of straightforward situations, and it restrains its propagation to more advanced fields that require earliness, prediction and proactivity. Therefore, we introduce autoCEP as a data mining-based approach that automatically learns CEP rules from historical traces. autoCEP requires no technical knowledge from domain experts, and it also shows that the generated rules fit for prediction and proactive applications. Satisfactory results from evaluations on real data demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework.

References

  1. Y.-F. Lin, H.-H. Chen, V. S. Tseng, and J. Pei. Reliable early classification on multivariate time series with numerical and categorical attributes. In Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 199--211. Springer, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Margara, G. Cugola, and G. Tamburrelli. Towards automated rule learning for complex event processing. Technical report, Technical Report, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Margara, G. Cugola, and G. Tamburrelli. Learning from the past: automated rule generation for complex event processing. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems, pages 47--58. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Mutschler and M. Philippsen. Learning event detection rules with noise hidden markov models. In Adaptive Hardware and Systems (AHS), 2012 NASA/ESA Conference on, pages 159--166. IEEE, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. S. Sen, N. Stojanovic, and L. Stojanovic. An approach for iterative event pattern recommendation. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems, pages 196--205. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Y. Turchin, A. Gal, and S. Wasserkrug. Tuning complex event processing rules using the prediction-correction paradigm. In Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems, page 10. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. L. Ye and E. Keogh. Time series shapelets: a new primitive for data mining. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 947--956. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Complex event processing for the non-expert with autoCEP: demo

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          DEBS '16: Proceedings of the 10th ACM International Conference on Distributed and Event-based Systems
          June 2016
          456 pages
          ISBN:9781450340212
          DOI:10.1145/2933267

          Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 13 June 2016

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • demonstration

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate130of553submissions,24%

          Upcoming Conference

          DEBS '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader