skip to main content
10.1145/2939672.2939694acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Aircraft Trajectory Prediction Made Easy with Predictive Analytics

Published:13 August 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

At the heart of Air Traffic Management (ATM) lies the Decision Support Systems (DST) that rely upon accurate trajectory prediction to determine how the airspace will look like in the future to make better decisions and advisories. Dealing with airspace that is prone to congestion due to environmental factors still remains the challenge especially when a deterministic approach is used in the trajectory prediction process. In this paper, we describe a novel stochastic trajectory prediction approach for ATM that can be used for more efficient and realistic flight planning and to assist airspace flow management, potentially resulting in higher safety, capacity, and efficiency commensurate with fuel savings thereby reducing emissions for a better environment. Our approach considers airspace as a 3D grid network, where each grid point is a location of a weather observation. We hypothetically build cubes around these grid points, so the entire airspace can be considered as a set of cubes. Each cube is defined by its centroid, the original grid point, and associated weather parameters that remain homogeneous within the cube during a period of time. Then, we align raw trajectories to a set of cube centroids which are basically fixed 3D positions independent of trajectory data. This creates a new form of trajectories which are 4D joint cubes, where each cube is a segment that is associated with not only spatio-temporal attributes but also with weather parameters. Next, we exploit machine learning techniques to train inference models from historical data and apply a stochastic model, a Hidden Markov Model (HMM), to predict trajectories taking environmental uncertainties into account. During the process, we apply time series clustering to generate input observations from an excessive set of weather parameters to feed into the Viterbi algorithm. Our experiments use a real trajectory dataset with pertaining weather observations and demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach to the trajectory prediction process for ATM.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

kdd2016_ayhan_predictive_analytics_01-acm.mp4

mp4

408.4 MB

References

  1. Action plan 16: Common trajectory prediction capability. https://acy.tc.faa.gov/cpat/tjm/TP_Requirements_Engineering_Methodology.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Aircraft operating expenses. http://www.opshots.net/2015/04/aircraft-operating-series-aircraft-operating-expenses/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Aircraft situation display to industry. http://www.fly.faa.gov/ASDI/asdi.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Definition of an aircraft trajectory by icao. http://ap16.atmrt.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Google earth. https://www.google.com/earth//.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Grib2 documentation. http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/docs/grib2/grib2_doc.shtml.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ncep wmo grib2 documentation. http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/docs/grib2/grib2_doc.shtml.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. G. Avanzini. Frenet-based algorithm for trajectory prediction. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 27(1):127--135, January 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. S. Ayhan and H. Samet. Diclerge: Divide-cluster-merge framework for clustering aircraft trajectories. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGSPATIAL IWCTS, Seattle, WA, November 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. Benavides, J. Kaneshige, S. Sharma, R. Panda, and M. Steglinski. Implementation of trajectory prediction function for trajectory based operations. In AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Atlanta, GA, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. J. Bronsvoort, G. McDonald, J. Lopez-Leones, and H. Visser. Improved trajectory prediction for air traffic management by simulation of guidance logic and inferred aircraft intent using existing data-link technology. In AIAA GNC Conference and Exhibit, Minneapolis, MN, August 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. E. Casado, C. Goodchild, and M. Vilaplana. Identification and initial characterization of sources of uncertainty affecting the performance of future trajectory management automation systems. In Proceedings of the 2nd Int'l Conference on ATACCS, pages 170--175, Toulouse, France, May 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. G. Chatterji. Short-term trajectory prediction methods. In AIAA GNC Conference and Exhibit, Portland, OR, August 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. P. Y. Choi and M. Hebert. Learning and predicting moving object trajectory: a piecewise trajectory segment approach. Technical report, Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science, Pittsburgh, PA, August 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. E. Crisostomi, A. Lecchini-visintini, and J. Maciejowski. Combining monte carlo and worst-case methods for trajectory prediction in air traffic control: A case study. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 43(4), 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. A. de Leege, M. van Paassen, and M. Mulder. A machine learning approach to trajectory prediction. In AIAA GNC Conference and Exhibit, Boston, MA, August 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. C. Esperança and H. Samet. Experience with SAND/Tcl: a scripting tool for spatial databases. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 13(2):229--255, April 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. C. Gong and D. McNally. A methodology for automated trajectory prediction analysis. In AIAA GNC Conference and Exhibit, Providence, RI, August 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. R. H. Güting and M. Schneider. Realm-based spatial data types: The rose algebra. The VLDB Journal, 4(2):243--286, April 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. E. Jacox and H. Samet. Metric space similarity joins. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 33(2):7, June 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. E. Keogh and C. A. Ratanamahatana. Exact indexing of dynamic time warping. Knowl. Inf. Syst., 7(3):358--386, March 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. J. Krozel and D. Andrisani. Intent inference and strategic path prediction. In AIAA GNC Conference and Exhibit, San Francisco, CA, August 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Y. Liu and X. R. Li. Intent based trajectory prediction by multiple model prediction and smoothing. In AIAA GNC Conference and Exhibit, New Orleans, LA, January 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. I. Lymperopoulos, J. Lygeros, and A. Lecchini. Model based aircraft trajectory prediction during takeoff. In AIAA GNC Conference and Exhibit, Keystone, CO, August 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. S. Mondoloni. A genetic algorithm for determining optimal flight trajectories. In AIAA GNC Conference and Exhibit, Boston, MA, August 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. S. Mondoloni. A multiple-scale model of wind-prediction uncertainty and application to trajectory prediction. In 6th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference, Wichita, KS, September 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. K. T. Mueller, J. A. Sorensen, and G. J. Couluris. Strategic aircraft trajectory prediction uncertainty and statistical sector traffic load modeling. In AIAA GNC Conference and Exhibit, Monterey, CA, August 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. H. K. Ng, S. Grabbe, and A. Mukherjee. Design and evaluation of a dynamic programming flight routing algorithm using the convective weather avoidance model. In AIAA GNC Conference and Exhibit, Chicago, IL, August 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. S. Nutanong, E. H. Jacox, and H. Samet. An incremental Hausdorff distance calculation algorithm. PVLDB, 4(8):506--517, August 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. S. Nutanong and H. Samet. Memory-efficient algorithms for spatial network queries. In Proceedings of the 29th IEEE Int'l Conference on Data Engineering, pages 649--660, Brisbane, Australia, April 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. M. Paglione and R. Oaks. Implementation and metrics for a trajectory prediction validation methodology. In AIAA GNC Conference and Exhibit, Hilton Head, SC, August 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. S. Peng, J. Sankaranarayanan, and H. Samet. SPDO: High-throughput road distance computations on spark using distance oracles. In Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE Int'l Conference on Data Engineering, pages 1239--1250, Helsinki, Finland, May 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. L. R. Rabiner. Readings in speech recognition. chapter A Tutorial on Hidden Markov Models and Selected Applications in Speech Recognition, pages 267--296. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. H. Ryan and M. Paglione. State vector based near term trajectory prediction. In AIAA GNC Conference and Exhibit, Honolulu, HI, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. H. Samet, H. Alborzi, F. Brabec, C. Esperança, G. R. Hjaltason, F. Morgan, and E. Tanin. Use of the SAND spatial browser for digital government applications. Communications of the ACM, 46(1):63--66, January 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. J. Sankaranarayanan, H. Alborzi, and H. Samet. Efficient query processing on spatial networks. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Int'l Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, pages 200--209, Bremen, Germany, November 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. J. Sankaranarayanan, H. Alborzi, and H. Samet. Distance join queries on spatial networks. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Int'l Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, pages 211--218, Arlington, VA, November 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. J. Sankaranarayanan and H. Samet. Distance oracles for spatial networks. In Proceedings of the 25th IEEE Int'l Conference on Data Engineering, pages 652--663, Shanghai, China, March 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. J. Sankaranarayanan and H. Samet. Query processing using distance oracles for spatial networks. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 22(8):1158--1175, August 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. J. Sankaranarayanan and H. Samet. Roads belong in databases. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 33(2):4--11, June 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. J. Sankaranarayanan, H. Samet, and H. Alborzi. Path oracles for spatial networks. PVLDB, 2(1):1210--1221, August 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. C. Schultz, D. Thipphavong, and H. Erzberger. Adaptive trajectory prediction algorithm for climbing flights. In AIAA GNC Conference and Exhibit, Minneapolis, MN, August 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. T. Stewart, L. Askey, and M. Hokit. A concept for tactical reroute generation, evaluation and coordination. In 12th AIAA ATIO Conference and 14th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Indianapolis, IN, September 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. T. Stewart, J. DeArmon, and D. Chaloux. Using flight information to improve weather avoidance predictions. In Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, Los Angeles, CA, August 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. S. Swierstra. Common trajectory prediction capability for decision support tools. In Proceedings of ATM 2003, 5th USA/Europa R&D Seminar, Budapest, Hungary, June 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. C. P. Taylor and C. Wanke. Improved dynamic generation of operationally acceptable reroutes using network optimization. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 34(4):961--975, August 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. C. Tomlin, G. J. Pappas, and S. Sastry. Conflict resolution for air traffic management: A study in multiagent hybrid systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 43(4):509--521, April 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. A. J. Viterbi. Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 13(2):260--269, April 1967. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. L. F. Winder and J. K. Kuchar. Hazard Avoidance Alerting with Markov Decision Processes. PhD thesis, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, August 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. J. L. Yepes, I. Hwang, and M. Rotea. An intent-based trajectory prediction algorithm for air traffic control. In AIAA GNC Conference and Exhibit, San Francisco, CA, August 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. J. L. Yepes, I. Hwang, and M. Rotea. New algorithms for aircraft intnet inference and trajectory prediction. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 30(2):370--382, March 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Aircraft Trajectory Prediction Made Easy with Predictive Analytics

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          KDD '16: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
          August 2016
          2176 pages
          ISBN:9781450342322
          DOI:10.1145/2939672

          Copyright © 2016 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 13 August 2016

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          KDD '16 Paper Acceptance Rate66of1,115submissions,6%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

          Upcoming Conference

          KDD '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader