skip to main content
10.1145/2940299.2940307acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Legitimacy, boundary objects & participation in transnational DIY biology

Published:15 August 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Prior research has stipulated that DIY making appeals to many of the concerns central to participatory design: democratization of technology production, individual empowerment and inclusivity. In this paper, we take this stipulation as the starting point of our inquiry, exploring how it happened that making came to be seen as enabler of participatory values and practices. We draw from ethnographic research that followed a transnational collaboration between DIY biologists, scientists, makers, and artists from Indonesia, Europe and India. The paper focuses on the production of three artifacts, tracing their enactment as boundary objects and experimentation in DIY biology. The artifacts did not only help legitimize DIYbio, but also positioned Indonesia itself as a legitimate participant in international networks of knowledge production. The paper contributes to prior research that has challenged stable frames like West/the rest. It draws out a positionality for PD that opens up making by recognizing its multiplicity crucial to the making of alternative and never stable futures.

References

  1. Ahmed, S. I., Mim, N. J., and Jackson, S. J. 2015. Residual Mobilities: Infrastructural Displacement and Post-Colonial Computing in Bangladesh. In Proc. of CHI '15, 437--446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Avle, S. and Lindtner, S. 2016. Design(ing) 'Here' and 'There': Tech Entrepreneurs, Global Markets, and Reflexivity in Design Processes. In Proc. of ACM CHI'16, San Jose, CA, pp. 2233--2245. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bannon, L. and Ehn, P. 2012. Design Matters in Participatory Design. In: J. Simonsen and T. Robertson (eds) Routledge Handbook of Participatory Design, 37--63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bardzell, J. and Bardzell, S. 2015. The User Reconfigured: On Subjectivities of Information. Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., and Hansen, L. K. 2015. Immodest Proposals: Research Through Design and Knowledge. Proc. of ACM Conference Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI'15 (Seoul, South Korea). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Barker, J., 2015. Guerilla engineers: The Internet and the politics of freedom in Indonesia. Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, p. 199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bean, J. and Rosner, D. 2014. Making: movement or brand?. interactions 21, 1 (January 2014), 26--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bechky, B. A., 2003. Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization science,14(3), 312--330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Beck, E. 2002. P for Political: Participation is Not Enough. Scandinavian journal of Information Systems, 14 (1), 77--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P. and Hillgren, Per-Anders. 2010. Participatory design and "democratizing innovation". In Proc. of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference(PDC '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 41--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Blog post on Mapping in Yogyakarta: http://biodesign.cc/2014/05/05/mapping-in-yogyakarta/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Boellstorff, T., 2005. The gay archipelago: Sexuality and nation in Indonesia. Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. 2000. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Bowman, M., Debray, S. K., and Peterson, L. L. 1993. Reasoning about naming systems. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 15, 5 (Nov. 1993), 795--825. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Brandt, E. 2006. Designing exploratory design games: a framework for participation in Participatory Design?. In Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design - Volume 1 (PDC '06), Vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 57--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Burrell, J. and Anderson, K., 2008. I have great desires to look beyond my world': trajectories of information and communication technology use among Ghanaians living abroad. New Media & Society, 10(2), 203--224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Chakrabarty, D., 2009. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Chan, A. S., 2014. Networking peripheries: Technological futures and the myth of digital universalism. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Clarke, A. 2005. Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn. SAGE Publications.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Ehn, P., Nilsson, E. M., & Topgaard, R. 2014. Making futures: Marginal notes on innovation, design, and democracy. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ehn, P. 2008. Participation in design things. In Proc. of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008 (PDC '08). Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA, 92--101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. EPA water sampling: http://www.epa.gov/waterdata/waters-watershed-assessment-tracking-environmental-results-systemGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Goss, A., 2011. The floracrats: State-sponsored science and the failure of the Enlightenment in Indonesia. Univ of Wisconsin Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Forlano, L. and Jungnickel, K., 2015. Hacking Binaries/Hacking Hybrids: Understanding the Black/White Binary as a Socio-technical Practice. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, (6).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Fox, S., Ulgado, R. R. and Rosner, D. 2015. Hacking Culture, Not Devices: Access and Recognition in Feminist Hackerspaces. In Proc. of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 56--68. {16} Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Haraway, D. J., 2008. When species meet (Vol. 224). U of Minnesota Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Irani, L., Vertesi, J., Dourish, P., Philip, K. and Grinter., R. E. 2010. Postcolonial computing: a lens on design and development. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1311--1320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Irani, L. 2015. Hackathons. Hackathons and the Making of Entrepreneurial Citizenship. Science, Technology & Human Values (Sage), Vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 799--824.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Jackson, S. J., Pompe, A. and Krieshok., G. 2012. Repair worlds: maintenance, repair, and ICT for development in rural Namibia. In Proc. of the ACM CSCW '12. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 107--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Kera, D. 2012. Hackerspaces and DIYbio in Asia: connecting science and community with open data, kits and protocols. Journal of Peer Production 2, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Kera. D. 2014. Innovation regimes based on collaborative and global tinkering: Synthetic biology and nanotechnology in the hackerspaces. Technology in Society 37, 28--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Kristensen, M., Kyng, M. and Palen., L. 2006. Participatory design in emergency medical service: designing for future practice. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), Rebecca Grinter, Thomas Rodden, Paul Aoki, Ed Cutrell, Robin Jeffries, and Gary Olson (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 161--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Kuznetsov, S., Doonan, C., Wilson, N., Mohan, S., Hudson, S. E., and Paulos, E. 2015. DIYbio Things: Open Source Biology Tools as Platforms for Hybrid Knowledge Production and Scientific Participation. In Proc. of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4065--4068. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Latour, B., 2005. Reassembling the social-an introduction to actor-network-theory. Reassembling the Social-An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, by Bruno Latour, pp. 316. Foreword by Bruno Latour. Oxford University Press, Sep 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Leahu, L., Thom-Santelli, J., Pederson, C. and Sengers, P. 2008. Taming the situationist beast. In Proc. of the ACM DIS '08. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 203--211. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Lee, C. P., 2007. Boundary negotiating artifacts: Unbinding the routine of boundary objects and embracing chaos in collaborative work. Journal of CSCW, 16(3), 307--339. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Light, A. and Akama, Y. 2012. The human touch: participatory practice and the role of facilitation in designing with communities. In Proc. of the ACM PDC '12, Kim Halskov, Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, Yanki Lee, Jesper Simonsen, and Keld Bødker (Eds.), Vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 61--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Light, A. and Akama, Y. 2014. Structuring future social relations: the politics of care in participatory practice. In Proc. of ACM PDC '14, Vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 151--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Lindtner, S. 2015. Hacking with Chinese Characteristics: The Promises of the Maker Movement against China's Manufacturing Culture. ST&HV September 2015 vol. 40 no. 5, 854--879.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Lindtner, S., Greenspan, A., & Li, D. (2015). Designed in Shenzhen: Shanzhai Manufacturing and Maker Entrepreneurs. Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing, 1(1), 12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Lindtner, S., Bardzell, S., Bardzell, J. 2016. Reconstituting the Utopian Vision of Making: HCI After Technosolutionism. In Proc. of ACM CHI'16, San Jose, CA, pp. 1390--1402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Luvaas. B. 2013. DIY style: fashion, music and global digital cultures. A&C BlackGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Marcus, G. E., 1995. Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual review of anthropology, pp. 95--117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Massey, D., 1993. Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place.Mapping the futures: Local cultures, global change, 1, 59--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Massimi, M. and Rosner., D. K. 2013. Crafting for major life events: implications for technology design and use. In Proc. of the 27th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference (BCS-HCI '13), Steve Love, Kate Hone, and Tom McEwan (Eds.). British Computer Society, Swinton, UK, UK, Article 34. 6 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Mol, A., 2002. The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Meyer, M. and Ermoshina, K., 2013, December. Bricolage as collaborative exploration: transforming matter, citizens and politics. In 1rst Interdisciplinary Innovation Conference. "Cooperating for innovation: devices for collective exploration".Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Oswick, C. and Robertson, M., 2009. Boundary objects reconsidered: from bridges and anchors to barricades and mazes. Journal of Change Management, 9(2), 179--193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Odshoorn, N and Pinch, T. 2005 How users matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technology. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Pratt, M. L., 1991. Arts of the contact zone. Profession, 33--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Ratto, Matt and Megan Boler (eds). 2014. DIY Citizenship. Critical Making and Social Media. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Ribes, D. and Baker, K., 2007. Modes of social science engagement in community infrastructure design. In Communities and Technologies 2007(pp. 107--130). Springer London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Rosner, D. K. and Ames. A. 2014. Designing for repair?: infrastructures and materialities of breakdown. In Proc. of CSCW '14. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 319--331. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Rosner, D. K. 2012. The material practices of collaboration. In Proc. of the ACM CSCW '12. New York, NY, USA, 1155--1164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Rosner, D. K., Jackson, Steven J., Hertz, G., Houston, L. and Rangaswamy, N. 2013. Reclaiming repair: maintenance and mending as methods for design. In ACM CHI '13 Extended Abstracts, New York, NY, USA, 3311--3314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S. and Kaye, J. 'J. Reflective Design. 2005. In Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility, 49--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Sivek, S. C. "We Need a Showing of All Hands" Technological Utopianism in MAKE Magazine. Journal of Communication Inquiry 35, 3 (2011), 187--209.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Spivak, G. C., 1988. Can the subaltern speak? (pp. 271--313). Macmillan Education UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. 1989. Institutional ecology, translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907--39. Social studies of science, 19(3), 387--420.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Strathern, M., 2005. Partial connections. Rowman Altamira.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Taylor, A. 2011. Out there. In Proc. of the ACM CHI'11, 685--694. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Tanenbaum, J. G., Williams, A. W., Desjardins, A. and Tanenbaum, K. 2013. Democratizing technology: pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice. In Proc. of ACM CHI '13, 2603--2612. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Toombs, A., Bardzell, S. and Bardzell, J. 2014. "Becoming Makers: Hackerspace Member Habits, Values, and Identities." Journal of Peer Production.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Tsing, A. L., 2011. Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Turnbull, D., 2000. Tricksters and Cartographers: Maps, Science and the State in the Making of a Modern Scientific Knowledge Space. ders., Masons, Tricksters and Cartographers, London, 89--130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Verran, H., 1998. Re-imagining land ownership in Australia. Postcolonial Studies: Culture, Politics, Economy, 1(2), 237--254.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Watts, L., 2008. The art and craft of train travel. Social & Cultural Geography, 9(6), 711--726.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Wenger, E., 1999. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge university press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Williams, A., Lindtner, S., Anderson, K., & Dourish, P. (2014). Multisited design: An analytical lens for Transnational HCI. Human--Computer Interaction, 29(1), 78--108. '08). Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 92--101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Zhan, M., 2009. Other-worldly: Making Chinese medicine through transnational frames. Duke University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., Evenson, S. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design in HCI. In Proc. of the CHI'07, pp. 493--500. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PDC '16: Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full papers - Volume 1
    August 2016
    192 pages
    ISBN:9781450340465
    DOI:10.1145/2940299

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 15 August 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate49of289submissions,17%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader