skip to main content
10.1145/2955129.2955134acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmisncConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Realities and Ideals of Competencies: The Perceptual Gaps between Companies and University Students

Published:15 August 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we examine the gap between the competencies that companies seek in university students and the requested competencies from companies that university students expect, through the distribution of a questionnaire to Japanese companies and university students. We find that a gap exists between companies' and students' evaluations of students' competencies. Surprisingly, the companies' and students' stated priorities for competencies are seriously different. Our results show that companies highly value versatile personal or interior competencies as being essential for employees. Conversely, students highly value skills and knowledge as essential competencies for work. These findings contribute toward developing appropriate curricula for universities.

References

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. 2015. School Basic Survey.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. 2014. The Data about Young Peoples Employ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan. 2010. The Research about Understanding University Students' View of the Member of Society and Perception of Fundamental Competencies for Working Persons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Okamoto, T., Kumagai, T., Soga, N. 2014. University Students' Competency: Companies Evaluation and University Students Self-evaluations. Ehime Economic Journal. 34, 2, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan. 2006. Fundamental Competencies for Working Persons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gensler, S., Hinz, O., Skiera, B. and Theysohn, S. 2012. Willingness-to-pay Estimation with Choice-based Conjoint Analysis: Addressing Extreme Response Behavior with Individually Adapted Designs. European Journal of Operational Research. 219, 2, 368--378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Chen, Y. H., Hsu, I. C. and Lin, C. C. 2010. Website Attributes that Increase Consumer Purchase Intention: A Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Business Research. 63, 9--10, 1007--1014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Halme, M. and Kallio, M. 2011. Estimation Methods for Choice-based Conjoint Analysis of Consumer Preferences. European Journal of Operational Research. 214, 1, 160--167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Revelt, D. and Train, K. 1998. Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 80, 4, 647--657.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Train, K. 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MISNC, SI, DS 2016: Proceedings of the The 3rd Multidisciplinary International Social Networks Conference on SocialInformatics 2016, Data Science 2016
    August 2016
    371 pages
    ISBN:9781450341295
    DOI:10.1145/2955129

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 15 August 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    MISNC, SI, DS 2016 Paper Acceptance Rate57of97submissions,59%Overall Acceptance Rate57of97submissions,59%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader