Characterizations of Online Harassment: Comparing Policies Across Social Media Platforms

ABSTRACT

Harassment in online spaces is increasingly part of public debate and concern. Pervasive problems like cyberbullying, hate speech, and the glorification of self-harm have highlighted the breadth and depth of harassment taking place online. In this study we conduct a content analysis of the governing policies for fifteen social media platforms as they relate to harassment (of oneself and/or of community members) and other associated behaviors. We find that there is a striking inconsistency in how platform-specific policies depict harassment. Additionally, how these policies prescribe responses to harassment vary from mild censuring to the involvement of law enforcement. Finally, based on our analysis and findings, we discuss the potential for harnessing the power of the online communities to create norms around problematic behaviors.

References

1. Ashktorab, Z. and Vitak, J. 2016. Designing Cyberbullying Mitigation and Prevention Solutions through Participatory Design With Teenagers. Proc. of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3895--3905.
2. Brown, K. et al. 2006. Cyber-Bullying: Developing Policy to Direct Responses that are Equitable and Effective in Addressing this Special Form of Bullying. Journal of Educational Administration. 57, 1--36.
3. Chancellor, S. et al. 2016. #thygapp: Instagram Content Moderation and Lexical Variation in Pro-Eating Disorder Communities. Proc. of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing.
4. Dadvar, M. and Jong, F. De. 2012. Cyberbullying detection: a step toward a safer Internet yard. Proc. of the 21st International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, 121--125.
5. DeNardis, L. and Hackl, A.M. 2015. Internet Governance by Socia Media Platforms. Telecommunications Policy. 39, 9, 761--770.
6. Djuric, N. et al. 2014. Hate Speech Detection with Commen Embeddings. Proc. of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, 29--30.
7. Fiesler, C. et al. 2016. An Archive of Their Own: A Case Study of Feminist HCI and Values in Design. Proc. of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2574--2585.
8. Fiesler, C. et al. 2016. Reality and Perception of Copyright Terms for Online Content Creation. Proc. of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported and Cooperative Work & Social Computing.
9. Fiesler, C. et al. 2015. Understanding Copyright Law in Online Creative Communities. Proc. of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 116--129.
10. Gilbert, P. and Irons, C. 2005. Focused therapies and compassionate mind training for shame and self-attacking. Compassion: Conceptualisations, research and use in psychotherapy. 263--325.
11. Good, N.S. et al. 2007. Noticing notice: a large-scale experiment on the timing of software license agreements. Proc. of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 607.
12. Jackson, S. et al. 2014. The policy knot: reintegrating policy, practice and desgin in CSCW studies of social computing. Proc. of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperateive Work & Social Computing, 588--602.
13. Jackson, S. et al. 2014. The Policy Knot: Re-integrating Policy, Practice and Design in CSCW Studies of Social Computing. Proc. of the Conf. on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 588--602.
14. Jensen, C. and Potts, C. 2014. Privacy Policies as Decision-Making Tools: An Evaluation of Online Privacy Notices. Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 471--478.
15. Lewis, S.P. et al. 2011. The scope of nonsuicidal self-injury on YouTube. Pediatrics. 127, 3 (2011), e552--e557.
16. Luger, E. et al. 2013. Consent for All: Revealing the Hidde Complexity of Terms and Conditions. Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2687--2696.
17. Massanari, A. 2015. #Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit's algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society.
18. Meredith, J.P. 2011. Combating Cyberbullying Emphasizing Education over Criminalization.pdf. Federal Comm. Law Journal. 63, 1 (2011), 311--340.
19. Morgan, J.T. et al. 2013. Tea & Sympathy: Crafting Positive New User Experiences on Wikipedia. Proc. of the 2013 conference on Computer supported co operative Work and Social Computing, 839--848.
20. Ostrom, E. 2015. Governing the Commons. Cambridge Univeristy Press.
21. Panko, R.R. and Beh, H.G. 2002. Monitoring for pornography and sexual harassment. Comm. of the ACM. 45, 1 (2002), 84--87.
22. Pater, J. et al. 2016. "Hunger Hurts but Starving Works:" Characterzing the Presentation of Eating Disorders Online. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing.
23. Wolak, J. et al. 2007. Does Online Harassment Constitute Bullying? An Exploration of Online Harassment by Known Peers and Online-Only Contacts. Journal of Adolescent Health. 41, 6 SUPPL. (2007).
24. Yin, D. et al. 2009. Detection of Harassment on Web 2.0. In Proc. of the Content Analysis in the WEB 2.0 Workshop at WWW

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing and business