skip to main content
10.1145/2957276.2997020acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Role of Social Media in Participatory Democracy: A Case Study of Facebook Groups

Published:13 November 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This dissertation investigates three Facebook groups as case studies of the role of social media in enhancing participatory democracy. I argue that the groups were formed to provide avenues for articulating discourses that are counter to the dominant voices of their societies. The study posits that in stratified societies there typically emerges a dominant hegemonic public opinion, which is inimical to the needs, hopes, desires, and aspirations of subordinate classes. The key research question I ask is: How are these groups using social media to build and articulate identities that question the dominant public opinion about issues that have traditionally been controlled by a hegemonic voice?

References

  1. "Kenya". CIA World Factbook. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ke.html. Retrieved May 14, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Butsch, R. 2007. Media and public spheres. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Fraser, N. 1990. "Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy". Social Text. (25/26): 56--80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Gramsci, A., Q. Hoare, and G. Nowell-Smith. 1972. Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York: International Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Habermas, J. 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Habermas, J., S. Lennox, and F. Lennox. 1974. "The public sphere: an encyclopedia article (1964)". New German Critique. 3 {New German Critique, Duke University Press}: 49--55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hegde R.S. 2009. "Fragments and interruptions: sensory regimes of violence and the limits of feminist ethnography". Qualitative Inquiry. 15 (2): 276--296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Markham, A., and E. Buchanan. 2012. "Ethical decision-making and internet research". Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee (Version 2.0).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. McChesney, R.W. 2015. Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mpofu, S. 2015. "When the subaltern speaks: citizen journalism and genocide 'victims'" voices online?. African Journalism Studies. 36 (4): 82--10Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Ogola, G. 2015. "Social media as a heteroglossic discursive space and Kenya's emergent alternative/citizen experiment". African Journalism Studies. 36 (4): 66--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. WIN-Gallup International. 2012. Global index of religiosity and atheism -- 2012. http://www.wingia.com/web/files/news/14/file/14.pdf. Retrieved February 22, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Role of Social Media in Participatory Democracy: A Case Study of Facebook Groups

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GROUP '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
      November 2016
      534 pages
      ISBN:9781450342766
      DOI:10.1145/2957276

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 November 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      GROUP '16 Paper Acceptance Rate36of111submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate125of405submissions,31%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader