skip to main content
10.1145/2968120.2987725acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschi-playConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Towards Player-Centric Adaptivity: Interactions of Gameplay Behaviour and Player Traits in a Survival Game

Published:15 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Feature-based player-centric game adaptivity offers many advantages in terms of optimising the player experience for wide appeal and replayability. Player typologies offer potential to steer adaptivity, as predicted by gameplay behaviour. However their applicability to the design of gameplay adaptation is yet to be fully explored. In this work, we investigate whether a trait-based typology correlates with player behaviour in a prototype survival game. We conducted an explorative study using BrainHex which showed no clear indication for the validity of this approach, raising questions for future research on player behaviour in games.

References

  1. Chris Bateman, Rebecca Lowenhaupt, and Lennart E Nacke. 2011. Player typology in theory and practice. In Proceedings of DiGRA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Max V Birk, Dereck Toker, Regan L Mandryk, and Cristina Conati. 2015. Modeling Motivation in a Social Network Game using Player-Centric Traits and Personality Traits. In International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. Springer, 18--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Marc Busch, Elke Mattheiss, Rita Orji, Peter Fröhlich, Michael Lankes, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2016. Player Type Models: Towards Empirical Validation. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1835--1841. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. DOI:http//dx.doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892399Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Guillaume Chanel, Cyril Rebetez, Mireille Bétrancourt, and Thierry Pun. 2011. Emotion assessment from physiological signals for adaptation of game difficulty. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, IEEE Transactions on 41, 6 (2011), 1052--1063. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Darryl Charles and Michaela Black. 2004. Dynamic player modeling: A framework for player-centered digital games. In Proc. of the International Conference on Computer Games: Artificial Intelligence, Design and Education. 29--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Darryl Charles, A Kerr, M McNeill, M McAlister, M Black, J Kücklich, A Moore, and K Stringer. 2005. Player-centred game design: Player modelling and adaptive digital games. In Proceedings of the Digital Games Research Conference, Vol. 285. 00100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Klei Entertainment. 2013. Don't Starve. Game {Computer}. (23 April 2013). Klei Entertainment, Vancouver, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. BEAM Team Games. 2015. Stranded Deep. Game {Computer}. (23 January 2015). BEAM, Brisbane, Australia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Michael Lankes, Wolfgang Hochleitner, Daniel Rammer, Marc Busch, Elke Mattheiss, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2015. From Classes to Mechanics: Player Type Driven Persuasive Game Development. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, 595--600. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ricardo Lopes and Rafael Bidarra. 2011. Adaptivity Challenges in Games and Simulations: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 3, 2 (2011), 85--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Mojang. 2011. Minecraft. Game {Computer}. (18 November 2011). Mojang, Stockholm, Sweden.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lennart E Nacke, Chris Bateman, and Regan L Mandryk. 2014. BrainHex: A neurobiological gamer typology survey. Entertainment computing 5, 1 (2014), 55--62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Rita Orji, Julita Vassileva, and Regan L Mandryk. 2014. Modeling the efficacy of persuasive strategies for different gamer types in serious games for health. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 24, 5 (2014), 453--498. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. John L Sherry, Kristen Lucas, Bradley S Greenberg, and Ken Lachlan. 2006. Video game uses and gratifications as predictors of use and game preference. Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences 24 (2006), 213--224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Climax Studios. 2009. Silent Hill: Shattered Memories. Game {Playstation 2}. (8 December 2009). Konami Digital Entertainment, Tokyo, Japan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Giel Van Lankveld, Pieter Spronck, H Jaap Van Den Herik, and Matthias Rauterberg. 2009. Incongruity-based adaptive game balancing. In Advances in computer games. Springer, 208--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Georgios N Yannakakis and Julian Togelius. 2011. Experience-driven procedural content generation. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 2, 3 (2011), 147--161. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Towards Player-Centric Adaptivity: Interactions of Gameplay Behaviour and Player Traits in a Survival Game

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI PLAY Companion '16: Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts
        October 2016
        388 pages
        ISBN:9781450344586
        DOI:10.1145/2968120

        Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 October 2016

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Work in Progress

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI PLAY Companion '16 Paper Acceptance Rate35of50submissions,70%Overall Acceptance Rate421of1,386submissions,30%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader