Understanding Aesthetics of Interaction: A Repertory Grid Study

ABSTRACT

This work in progress paper explores users' perceptions of the aesthetics of interaction. We describe a qualitative study using the Repertory Grid Technique (RGT) that elicited individuals' personal constructs, bipolar adjectives such as beautiful vs ugly that characterize individuals' idiosyncratic ways of classifying and differentiating between a set of stimuli. The constructs were sorted by similarity, resulting in a set of aesthetic categories. Quantitative data (i.e., participants' ratings) from the RGT further enables us to assess the internal consistency of the emerging categories as well as to chart the design space of aesthetic interactions. All in all, 23 categories of aesthetics of interaction were established based on users' perceptions. These categories partially corroborated (e.g., speed, proximity, complexity) but also expanded (e.g., natural realism, congruence, dimensionality) prior work on experience qualities in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI).

References

1. Djajadiningrat, T., Wensveen, S., Frens, J., & Overbeeke, K. (2004). Tangible products: Redressing the balance between appearance and action. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8, 294--309.
2. Fallman, D., & Waterworth, J. (2005). Dealing with User Experience and Affective Evaluation in HCI Design: A Repertory Grid Approach. Focus, 2--7.
3. Frens, J. (2006). Designing for Rich Interaction: Integrating Form, Interaction, and Function. In Integrating, Form, Interaction, and Function (p. 224).
4. Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., & Koller, F. (2003). AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. Mensch & Computer 2003: Interaktion in Bewegung, 187--196.
5. Hassenzahl, M., & Wessler, R. (2000). Capturing Design Space From a User Perspective: The Repertory Grid Technique Revisited. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 12(3), 441--459.
6. Karapanos, E., & Martens, J.-B. (2008). The quantitative side of the Repertory Grid Technique: some concerns. UXEM Workshop in CHI'08, April 6th, 2008.
7. Kelly, G. A. (2003). A Brief Introduction to Personal Construct Theory. In International Handbook of Personal Construct Psychology (pp. 3--20).
8. Lavie, T., & Tractinsky, N. (2004). Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. Human-Computer Studies, (60), 269--298.
9. Lenz, E., Diefenbach, S., & Hassenzahl, M. (2013). Exploring Relationships Between Interaction Attributes and Experience. In Proc. DPPI 2013 (pp. 126--135).
10. Lim, Y., Lee, S.-S., & Lee, K. (2009). Interactivity attributes: A New Way of Thinking and Describing Interactivity. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems -CHI 09, 105.
11. Moshagen, M., & Thielsch, M. T. (2010). Facets of visual aesthetics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(10), 689--709.
12. Petersen, M. G., Iversen, O. S., Krogh, P. G., & Ludvigsen, M. (2004). Aesthetic Interaction: a pragmatist's aesthetics of interactive systems. Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, 269--276.
13. Ross, P. R., & Wensveen, S. A. G. (2010). Designing behavior in interaction: Using aesthetic experience as a mechanism for design. International Journal of Design, 4(2), 3--13.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing