skip to main content
10.1145/2971648.2971734acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Situational impairments to mobile interaction in cold environments

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 September 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We evaluate the situational impairments caused by cold ambient temperature on fine-motor movement and vigilance during mobile interaction. For this purpose, we tested two mobile phone applications that measure fine motor skills and vigilance in controlled temperature settings. Our results show that cold adversely affected participants' fine-motor skills performance, but not vigilance. Based on our results we highlight the importance of correcting measurements when investigating performance of cognitive tasks to take into account the physical element of the tasks. Finally, we identify a number of design recommendations from literature that can mitigate the adverse effect of cold ambiance on interaction with mobile devices.

References

  1. Alan D. Baddeley, William J. Cuccaro, Glen H. Egstrom, Gershon Weltman and Michael A. Willis. 1975. Cognitive Efficiency of Divers Working in Cold Water. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 17, 5: 446-454.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. M. L. Bartelink, A De Wit, H Wollersheim, A Theeuwes and T Thien. 1993. Skin vascular reactivity in healthy subjects: influence of hormonal status. J Appl Physiol (1985) 74, 2: 727--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. C. Blomkvist and G. Gard. 2000. Computer usage with cold hands; an experiment with pointing devices. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 6, 4: 429--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Sebastian Boring, David Ledo, Xiang Chen, Nicolai Marquardt, Anthony Tang and Saul Greenberg. 2012. The Fat Thumb: Using the Thumb's Contact Size for Single-handed Mobile Interaction. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, ACM, 39--48. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2371574.2371582 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Andreas Bulling and Hans Gellersen. 2010. Toward Mobile Eye-Based Human-Computer Interaction. IEEE Pervasive Computing 9, 4: 8--12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2010.86 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. R. K. Coleshaw, R. N. M. van Someren, A. H. Wolff, H. M. Davis and W. R. Keatinge. 1984. Impaired Memory Registration and Speed of Reasoning Caused by Low Body Temperature. Survey of Anesthesiology 28, 4: 340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hein A. Daanen, Evert van de Vliert and Xu Huang. 2003. Driving performance in cold, warm, and thermoneutral environments. Applied Ergonomics 34, 6: 597--602.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Sacha N. Duff, Curt B. Irwin, Jennifer L. Skye, Mary E. Sesto and Douglas A. Wiegmann. 2010. The effect of disability and approach on touch screen performance during a number entry task. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 54, 6, 566--570.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Andrew J. Elliot, Markus A. Maier, Arlen C. Moller, Ron Friedman and Jörg Meinhardt. 2007. Color and psychological functioning: The effect of red on performance attainment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136, 1: 154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Hadyn D. Ellis. 1982. The Effects of Cold on the Performance of Serial Choice Reaction Time and Various Discrete Tasks. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 24, 5: 589--598.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Hadyn D. Ellis, Sylvia E. Wilcock and S. A. Zaman. 1985. Cold and performance: The effects of information load, analgesics and the rate of cooling. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. P. M. Fitts. 1954. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47, 6: 381--91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0055392Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Andreas D. Flouris, David A. Westwood and Stephen S. Cheung. 2007. Thermal Balance Effects on Vigilance During 2-Hour Exposures To -20°C. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 78, 7: 673--679.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gordon Giesbrecht, J. L. Arnett, E Vela and G. K. Bristow. 1993. Effect of task complexity on mental performance during immersion hypothermia. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mayank Goel, Leah Findlater and Jacob Wobbrock. 2012. WalkType: using accelerometer data to accomodate situational impairments in mobile touch screen text entry. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2687--2696. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208662 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mayank Goel, Jacob Wobbrock and Shwetak Patel. 2012. GripSense: Using Built-in Sensors to Detect Hand Posture and Pressure on Commodity Mobile Phones. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM, 545--554. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2380116.2380184 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jorge Goncalves, Vassilis Kostakos, Simo Hosio, Evangelos Karapanos, and Olga Lyra. 2013. IncluCity: using contextual cues to raise awareness on environmental accessibility. In Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '13). Article 17 http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2513383.2517030 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Jorge Goncalves, Simo Hosio, Yong Liu, Y. and Vassilis Kostakos. 2014. Eliciting situated feedback: A comparison of paper, web forms and public displays. Displays 35, 1: 27--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. G. Havenith, R. Heus and H. A. Daanen. 1995. The hand in the cold, performance and risk. Arctic Med Res 54 Suppl 2: 37--47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Niels Henze, Enrico Rukzio and Susanne Boll. 2011. 100,000,000 Taps: Analysis and Improvement of Touch Performance in the Large. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, ACM, 133--142. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2037373.2037395 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Simo Hosio, Jorge Goncalves, Vassilis Kostakos, and Jukka Riekki. 2015. Crowdsourcing Public Opinion Using Urban Pervasive Technologies: Lessons From Real-Life Experiments in Oulu. Policy & Internet 7, 2: 203--222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Zhao X. Jin, Tom Plocher and Liana Kiff. 2007. Touch screen user interfaces for older adults: button size and spacing. Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73279-2_104 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Shaun K. Kane. 2009. Context-enhanced Interaction Techniques for More Accessible Mobile Phones. SIGACCESS Access. Comput. 93: 39--43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1531930.1531936 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Shaun K. Kane, Chandrika Jayant, Jacob O. Wobbrock and Richard E. Ladner. 2009. Freedom to roam: a study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities. In Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, 115--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. List of Most downloaded Android applications. Retrieved 28/03/2016 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_downloaded_Android_applicationsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Yong Liu, Jorge Goncalves, Denzil Ferreira, Simo Hosio and Vassilis Kostakos. 2014. Identity crisis of ubicomp?: mapping 15 years of the field's development and paradigm change. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '14), 75--86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2632048.2632086 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. T. Makinen, L. Palinkas, D. Reeves, T. Paakkonen, H. Rintamaki, J. Leppaluoto and J. Hassi. 2006. Effect of repeated exposures to cold on cognitive performance in humans. Physiology & Behavior 87, 1: 166--176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Ravi Mehta and Rui Zhu. 2009. Blue or Red? Exploring the Effect of Color on Cognitive Task Performances. Science 323, 5918: 1226--1229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1169144Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Emiliano Miluzzo, Tianyu Wang and Andrew T. Campbell. 2010. EyePhone: Activating Mobile Phones with Your Eyes. In Proceedings of the Second ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Networking, Systems, and Applications on Mobile Handhelds, ACM, 15--20. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1851322.1851328 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Takashi Miyaki and Jun Rekimoto. 2009. GraspZoom: Zooming and Scrolling Control Model for Single-handed Mobile Interaction. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, ACM, 11:1--11:4. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1613858.1613872 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. L. Palinkas. 2001. Circannual pattern of hypothalamic--pituitary--thyroid (HPT) function and mood during extended antarctic residence. Psychoneuroendocrinology 26, 4: 421--431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0306-4530(00)00064-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Lawrence A. Palinkas. 2001. Mental and cognitive performance in the cold. International Journal of Circumpolar Health 60, 3: 430--439.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Yong S. Park and Sung H. Han. 2010. Touch key design for one-handed thumb interaction with a mobile phone: Effects of touch key size and touch key location. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 40, 1: 68--76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. June Pilcher, Eric Nadler and Caroline Busch. 2010. Effects of hot and cold temperature exposure on performance: a meta-analytic review. Ergonomics. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140130210158419Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Richard L. Potter, Linda J. Weldon and Ben Shneiderman. 1988. Improving the accuracy of touch screens: an experimental evaluation of three strategies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 27--32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/57167.57171 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. J. E. Reading, D. E. Roberts and W. K. Prusaczyk. 1997. Gender differences in finger temperatures during cold air exposure. San Diego, CA: Naval Health Reseach Center.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Enrico Rukzio, Karin Leichtenstern, Vic Callaghan, Paul Holleis, Albrecht Schmidt and Jeannette Chin. 2006. An Experimental Comparison of Physical Mobile Interaction Techniques: Touching, Pointing and Scanning. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11853565_6 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Anthony J. Sargeant. Effect of muscle temperature on leg extension force and short-term power output in humans. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology 56, 6: 693--698. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00424812Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Andrew Sears, Mark Young and Jinjuan Feng. 2003. Physical disabilities and computing technologies: an analysis of impairments.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Paul R. Stang and Earl L. Wiener. 1970. Diver Performance in Cold Water. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 12, 4: 391--399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872087001200405Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Nancy J. Stone. 2003. Environmental view and color for a simulated telemarketing task. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23, 1: 63--78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0272-4944(02)00107-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Warren H. Teichner. 1958. Reaction time in the cold. Journal of Applied Psychology 42, 1: 54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0049145Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. W. S. Vaughan. 1977. Distraction effect of cold water on performance of higher-order tasks. Undersea Biomedical Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. J. A. Vaughan, E. A. Higgins, G. E. Funkhouser and E. M. Galerston. 1968. The effects of body thermal state on manual performance. AM-68-13. AM reports 68, 13: 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. W. S. Vaughan Jr and Michael B. Strauss. 1975. Exploratory Analysis of Predictors of Diver Performance Decrement During 3-Hour, Cold Water ExposuresGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Hannu Virokannas.Thermal responses to light, moderate and heavy daily outdoor work in cold weather. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology 72, 5--6: 483--489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00242279Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2006. The future of mobile device research in HCI. In CHI 2006 workshop proceedings: what is the next generation of human-computer interaction, 131--134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Brad A. Myers and John A. Kembel. 2003. EdgeWrite: A Stylus-based Text Entry Method Designed for High Accuracy and Stability of Motion. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM, 61--70. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/964696.964703 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Mark A. Yeshnik. 1988. The variability of German winter temperature in relation to human performance and its implications for tactical military operations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Yu Zhong, Astrid Weber, Casey Burkhardt, Phil Weaver and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2015. Enhancing Android accessibility for users with hand tremor by reducing fine pointing and steady tapping. In Proceedings of the 12th Web for All Conference, 29. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2745555.2747277 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Situational impairments to mobile interaction in cold environments

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
      September 2016
      1288 pages
      ISBN:9781450344616
      DOI:10.1145/2971648

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 September 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      UbiComp '16 Paper Acceptance Rate101of389submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader