skip to main content
10.1145/2971648.2971758acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Lets not stare at smartphones while walking: memorable route recommendation by detecting effective landmarks

Published:12 September 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Navigation in unfamiliar cities often requires frequent map checking, which is troublesome for wayfinders. We propose a novel approach for improving real-world navigation by generating short, memorable and intuitive routes. To do so we detect useful landmarks for effective route navigation. This is done by exploiting not only geographic data but also crowd footprints in Social Network Services (SNS) and Location Based Social Networks (LBSN). Specifically, we detect point, area, and line landmarks by using three indicators to measure landmark's utility: visit popularity, direct visibility, and indirect visibility. We then construct an effective route graph based on the extracted landmarks, which facilitates optimal path search. In the experiments, we show that landmark-based routes out-perform the ones created by baseline from the perspectives of the lap time and the number of references necessary to check self-positions for adjusting route directions.

References

  1. E. Antoine, A. Jatowt, S. Wakamiya, Y. Kawai, and T. Akiyama. Portraying collective spatial attention in twitter. In KDD '15, pages 39--48, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. DataSF. https://data.sfgov.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Duckham, S. Winter, and M. Robinson. Including landmarks in routing instructions. J. Locat. Based Serv., 4(1):28--52, Mar. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Z. Fan, X. Song, R. Shibasaki, and R. Adachi. Citymomentum: An online approach for crowd behavior prediction at a citywide level. In UbiComp '15, pages 559--569, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. K. Fu, Y.-C. Lu, and C.-T. Lu. Treads: A safe route recommender using social media mining and text summarization. In SIGSPATIAL '14, pages 557--560, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Furlan, T. Baldwin, and A. Klippel. Landmark classification for route directions. In SigSem '07, pages 9--16. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Geospatial Information Authority of Japan. http://www.gsi.go.jp/ENGLISH/page_e30031.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Google Directions. https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/directions/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Google Maps Street View. https://www.google.com/maps/views/streetview?gl=us.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. H. Hile, R. Vedantham, G. Cuellar, A. Liu, N. Gelfand, R. Grzeszczuk, and G. Borriello. Landmark-based pedestrian navigation from collections of geotagged photos. In MUM '08, pages 145--152, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. H. Holland. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. MIT Press, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. S. Janarthanam, O. Lemon, and X. Liu. A web-based evaluation framework for spatial instruction-giving systems. In ACL '12, pages 49--54. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. P. Kallioniemi and M. Turunen. Model for landmark highlighting in mobile web services. In MUM '12, pages 25:1--25:10, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Landmark Navi (online DEMO site). http://www.ibe.kagoshima-u.ac.jp/~lmnavi/index_en.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. X. Li, G. Cong, X.-L. Li, T.-A. N. Pham, and S. Krishnaswamy. Rank-geofm: A ranking based geographical factorization method for point of interest recommendation. In SIGIR '15, pages 433--442, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. R. Likert. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140(55), 1932.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. K. Lynch. The Image of the City. MIT Press, 1960.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. P.-E. Michon and M. Denis. When and why are visual landmarks used in giving directions? In Spatial Information Theory, volume 2205, pages 292--305. 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. L. Nasar and D. Troyer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. L. R. Peterson and M. J. Peterson. Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of experimental psychology, 58(3):193--198, 1959.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. D. Quercia, R. Schifanella, and L. M. Aiello. The shortest path to happiness: Recommending beautiful, quiet, and happy routes in the city. In HT '14, pages 116--125, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. M. Raubal and S. Winter. Enriching wayfinding instructions with local landmarks. In Geographic Information Science, volume 2478, pages 243--259. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. D. Sacharidis and P. Bouros. Routing directions: Keeping it fast and simple. In SIGSPATIAL '13, pages 164--173, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Z. Shan, H. Wu, W. Sun, and B. Zheng. Cobweb: A robust map update system using gps trajectories. In UbiComp '15, pages 927--937, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. J. Shao, L. Kulik, and E. Tanin. Easiest-to-reach neighbor search. In GIS '10, pages 360--369, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. ZENRIN CO., LTD. http://www.zenrin.co.jp/english/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. J.-D. Zhang and C.-Y. Chow. Geosoca: Exploiting geographical, social and categorical correlations for point-of-interest recommendations. In SIGIR '15, pages 443--452, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Lets not stare at smartphones while walking: memorable route recommendation by detecting effective landmarks

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          UbiComp '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
          September 2016
          1288 pages
          ISBN:9781450344616
          DOI:10.1145/2971648

          Copyright © 2016 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 12 September 2016

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          UbiComp '16 Paper Acceptance Rate101of389submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader