skip to main content
10.1145/2984511.2984534acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

SleepCoacher: A Personalized Automated Self-Experimentation System for Sleep Recommendations

Published:16 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present SleepCoacher, an integrated system implementing a framework for effective self-experiments. SleepCoacher automates the cycle of single-case experiments by collecting raw mobile sensor data and generating personalized, data-driven sleep recommendations based on a collection of template recommendations created with input from clinicians. The system guides users through iterative short experiments to test the effect of recommendations on their sleep. We evaluate SleepCoacher in two studies, measuring the effect of recommendations on the frequency of awakenings, self-reported restfulness, and sleep onset latency, concluding that it is effective: participant sleep improves as adherence with SleepCoacher's recommendations and experiment schedule increases. This approach presents computationally-enhanced interventions leveraging the capacity of a closed feedback loop system, offering a method for scaling guided single-case experiments in real time.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p347-daskalova.mp4

mp4

244.8 MB

References

  1. 2014. Brain Basics: Understanding Sleep. (2014). Retrieved September 24, 2015 from http://ninds.nih.gov/disorders/brain_ basics/understanding_sleep.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2014. Healthy Sleep Tips. (2014). Retrieved November 23, 2014 from http://sleepfoundation. org/sleep-tools-tips/healthy-sleep-tips.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2015. Sleep as Android. (2015). Retrieved September 24, 2015 from https: //sites.google.com/site/sleepasandroid/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. S. Ancoli-Israel, R. Cole, C. Alessi, M. Chambers, W. Moorcroft, and C. Pollak. 2003. The role of actigraphy in the study of sleep and circadian rhythms. American Academy of Sleep Medicine Review Paper. Sleep 26, 3 (2003), 342--392. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J.S. Bauer, S. Consolvo, B. Greenstein, J. Schooler, E. Wu, N.F. Watson, and J. Kientz. 2012. ShutEye: Encouraging Awareness of Healthy Sleep Recommendations with a Mobile, Peripheral Display. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). 1401--1410. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208600 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. F. Bentley, K. Tollmar, P. Stephenson, L. Levy, B. Jones, S. Robertson, E. Price, R. Catrambone, and J. Wilson. 2013. Health Mashups: Presenting Statistical Patterns Between Wellbeing Data and Context in Natural Language to Promote Behavior Change. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 20, 5 (2013), 30:1--30:27. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2503823 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Blaivas. 2014. Polysomnography. (2014). Retrieved April 13, 2015 from http://www.nlm.nih. gov/medlineplus/ency/article/003932.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Z. Chen, M. Lin, F. Chen, N.D. Lane, G. Cardone, R. Wang, T. Li, Y. Chen, T. Choudhury, and A.T. Campbell. 2013. Unobtrusive sleep monitoring using smartphones. In Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), 2013 7th International Conference on. IEEE, 145--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. E. K. Choe, S. Consolvo, N. F. Watson, and J. A. Kientz. 2011. Opportunities for Computing Technologies to Support Healthy Sleep Behaviors. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). 3053--3062. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979395 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. N. Daskalova, N. Ford, A. Hu, Moorehead K., B. Wagnon, and J. Davis. 2014. Informing Design of Suggestion and Self-Monitoring Tools through Participatory Experience Prototypes. In Proc. Persuasive Tech. DOI:http: //dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07127-5_7 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. A. Durlak. 2009. How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes. Journal of pediatric psychology (2009), jsp004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. B. S. Fjeldsoe, A. L. Marshall, and Y. D. Miller. 2009. Behavior change interventions delivered by mobile telephone short-message service. American journal of preventive medicine 36, 2 (2009), 165--173. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. B. J. Fogg. 2002. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Ubiquity 2002, December, Article 5 (2002). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/764008.763957 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. T. Hao, G. Xing, and G. Zhou. 2013. iSleep: Unobtrusive Sleep Quality Monitoring Using Smartphones. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys '13). Article 4, 4:1--4:14 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2517351.2517359 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Heyvaert and P. Onghena. 2014. Randomization tests for single-case experiments: State of the art, state of the science, and state of the application. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science 3, 1 (2014), 51--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. G. Jean-Louis, D.F. Kripke, R.J. Cole, J.D. Assmus, and R.D. Langer. 2001. Sleep detection with an accelerometer actigraph: comparisons with polysomnography. Physiology & Behavior 72, 1 (2001), 21--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. M. Kay, E. K. Choe, J. Shepherd, B. Greenstein, N. Watson, S. Consolvo, and J. A. Kientz. 2012. Lullaby: A Capture & Access System for Understanding the Sleep Environment. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '12). 226--234. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370253 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. A. Killingsworth and D. T. Gilbert. 2010. A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science 330, 6006 (2010), 932--932. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. T. R. Kratochwill, J. H. Hitchcock, R. H. Horner, J. R. Levin, S. L. Odom, D. M. Rindskopf, and W. R. Shadish. 2012. Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education (2012), 0741932512452794.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. R. Manolov and A. Solanas. 2008. Comparing N= 1 effect size indices in presence of autocorrelation. Behavior Modification 32, 6 (2008), 860--875. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. J. Min, A. Doryab, J. Wiese, S. Amini, J. Zimmerman, and J. I. Hong. 2014. Toss "N" Turn: Smartphone As Sleep and Sleep Quality Detector. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). 477--486. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557220 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. V. Natale, M. Drejak, A. Erbacci, L. Tonetti, M. Fabbri, and M. Martoni. 2012. Monitoring sleep with a smartphone accelerometer. Sleep and Biological Rhythms 10, 4 (2012), 287--292. DOI:http://dx. doi.org/10.1111/j.1479--8425.2012.00575.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Northcube. 2015. SleepCycle. (2015). Retrieved September 24, 2015 from http://www.sleepcycle.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. W. Ooteman, M. Koeter, R. Vserheul, G. M. Schippers, and W. Brink. 2006. Measuring craving: an attempt to connect subjective craving with cue reactivity. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 30, 1 (2006), 57--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. J. Paquet, A. Kawinska, and J. Carrier. 2007. Wake detection capacity of actigraphy during sleep. Sleep 30, 10 (2007), 1362.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. C. Pollak, W. Tryon, H. Nagaraja, and R. Dzwonczyk. 2001. How Accurately Does Wrist Actigraphy Identify the States of Sleep and Wakefulness' 24, 8 (2001), 957--965.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. A. Sadeh, P.J. Hauri, D.F. Kripke, and P. Lavie. 1995. The role of actigraphy in the evaluation of sleep disorders. Sleep 18, 4 (1995), 288--302. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. A. Sadeh, K. M. Sharkey, and M. A. Carskadon. 1994. Activity-Based SleepWake Identification: An Empirical Test of Methodological Issues. Sleep 17, 3 (1994), 201--207. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. H. Shin, B. Choi, D. Kim, and J. Cho. 2014. Robust Sleep Quality Quantification Method for a Personal Handheld Device. Telemedicine and e-Health 20, 6 (2014), 522--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. L. L. Sievert, K. Begum, R. Sharmeen, O. Chowdhury, S. Muttukrishna, and G. Bentley. 2008. Patterns of occurrence and concordance between subjective and objective hot flashes among Muslim and Hindu women in Sylhet, Bangladesh. American Journal of Human Biology 20, 5 (2008), 598--604. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. J. D. Smith. 2012. Single-case experimental designs: A systematic review of published research and current standards. Psychological Methods 17, 4 (2012), 510.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Mayo Clinical Staff. 2014. Polysomnography (sleep study). (2014). Retrieved April 13, 2015 from http://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/ polysomnography/basics/definition/ prc-20013229.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. G. M. Sullivan and R. Feinn. 2012. Using effect size-or why the P value is not enough. Journal of graduate medical education 4, 3 (2012), 279--282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. SleepCoacher: A Personalized Automated Self-Experimentation System for Sleep Recommendations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UIST '16: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology
      October 2016
      908 pages
      ISBN:9781450341899
      DOI:10.1145/2984511

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 October 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      UIST '16 Paper Acceptance Rate79of384submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

      Upcoming Conference

      UIST '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader