skip to main content
10.1145/2994310.2994344acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmindtrekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Outlining the design space of playful interactions between nearby strangers

Published:17 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Designing interactive technology with an aim to encourage social interaction between nearby strangers is challenging. While there are various social norms, cultural practices and privacy concerns that hinder interaction with strangers, ignoring the other people can be even more detrimental in the long term (e.g., leading to a low sense of community and missed opportunities). In order to better understand this paradoxical design space, we arranged co-design workshops aiming to create ideas of future services where interactive technology playfully encourages interaction between nearby strangers. By analyzing the resulting ideas, we identify various aspects and elements that conceptualize and theorize this so far fuzzy design space. We explicate concepts like Hotter, Hotter, Changing Other's Avatar and Dancing, and analyze the 60 resulting concepts to identify elements and viewpoints important in this design space. The conceptualization can help ideating future services, identifying relevant research questions, as well as evaluating design solutions with respect to relevant quality attributes.

References

  1. Abouzied, A. and Chen, J. 2014. CommonTies: a context-aware nudge towards social interaction. In Proceedings of the companion publication of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW Companion '14). ACM, 1--4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556420.2556783 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Balestrini, M., Marshall, P., Cornejo, R., Tentori, M., Bird, J. and Rogers, Y. 2016. Jokebox: Coordinating Shared Encounters in Public Spaces. In Proceedings of CSCW '16. ACM, 38--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bell, M., Chalmers, M., Barkhuus, L., Hall, M., Sherwood, S., Tennent, P., Brown, B., Rowland, D., Benford, S., Capra, M. and Hampshire, A. 2006. Interweaving mobile games with everyday life. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06). ACM, 417--426. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1124772.1124835 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Briceño, V. 2014. The Sound of One 3DS Clapping: User Commodification in StreetPass. In Proceedings of DiGRA 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Eagle, N. and Pentland, A. 2005. Social Serendipity: Mobilizing Social Software. IEEE Pervasive Computing, v.4 n.2, p.28--34, April 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Goffman, E. Behavior in Public Places. Free Press, New York, USA, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Heinemann, T. and Mitchell, R. 2014. Breaching barriers to collaboration in public spaces. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI '14). ACM, 213--220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2540930.2540951 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ito, M., Okabe, D., and Anderson, K. 2009. Portable objects in three global cities: The personalization of urban places. The reconstruction of space and time: mobile communication practices, 67--87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jarusriboonchai, P., Olsson, T., Ojala, J. and Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. 2014. Opportunities and challenges of mobile applications as "tickets-to-talk": a scenario-based user study. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM '14). ACM, 89--97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2677972.2677993 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jarusriboonchai, P., Olsson, T., Prabhu, V. and Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. 2015. CueSense: A Wearable Proximity-Aware Display Enhancing Encounters. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15). ACM, 2127--2132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732833 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jung, Y., Blom, J. and Persson, P. 2006. Scent field trial: understanding emerging social interaction. In Proceedings of the 8th conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services (MobileHCI '06). ACM, 69--76. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1152215.1152230 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kinch, S., Grönvall, E., Graves Petersen, M. and Kirkegaard Rasmussen, M. 2014. Encounters on a shape-changing bench: exploring atmospheres and social behaviour in situ. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI '14). ACM, 233--240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2540930.2540947 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kultima, A., Niemelä, J., Paavilainen, J. and Saarenpää, H. 2008. Designing game idea generation games. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Future Play: Research, Play, Share (Future Play '08). ACM, 137--144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1496984.1497007 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kultima, A. 2011. "A Modular Ideation Game --- The Concept of IDECARDS" in Kultima, A. & Alha, K. (Eds.) Changing Faces of Game Innovation. GaIn and GIIP Research Project Report. TRIM Research Reports 4. University of Tampere.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Licoppe, C. and Inada, Y. 2012. 'Timid encounters': a case study in the use of proximity-based mobile technologies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'12). ACM, 2759--2768. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2207676.2208675 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lucero, A., Vaajakallio, K. and Dalsgaard, P. 2012. The dialogue-labs method: process, space and materials as structuring elements to spark dialogue in co-design events. CoDesign, 8(1), 1--23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.609888Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Lucero, A. 2012. Framing, aligning, paradoxing, abstracting, and directing: how design mood boards work. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12). ACM, 438--447. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2317956.2318021 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Lucero, A. and Arrasvuori, J. 2013. The PLEX Cards and its techniques as sources of inspiration when designing for playfulness. IJART 6(1), 22--43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJART.2013.050688Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Lucero, A., Karapanos, E., Arrasvuori, J. and Korhonen, H. 2014. Playful or Gameful?: creating delightful user experiences. interactions 21, 3 (May 2014), 34--39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2590973 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Lucero, A., Dalsgaard, P., Halskov, K. and Buur, J. 2016. Designing with Cards. Collaboration in Creative Design. Springer, 75--95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29155-0_5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ludvigsen, M. 2006. Designing for social interaction. Department of Design. Aarhus School of Architecture.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Lundgren, S., Fischer, J. E., Reeves, S. and Torgersson, O. 2015. Designing Mobile Experiences for Collocated Interaction. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM, 496--507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675171 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Mayer, J. M., Hiltz, S. R. and Jones, Q. 2015. Making Social Matching Context-Aware: Design Concepts and Open Challenges. In Proceedings of CHI '15. ACM, 545--554. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. McCarthy, J. F., McDonald, D. W., Soroczak, S., Nguyen, D. H. and Rashid, A. M. 2004. Augmenting the social space of an academic conference. In Proceedings of CSCW '04. ACM, 39--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Paulos, E. and Goodman, E. 2004. The familiar stranger: anxiety, comfort, and play in public places. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '04). ACM, 223--230. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/985692.985721 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Peitz, J., Saarenpää, H. and Björk, S. 2007. Insectopia: exploring pervasive games through technology already pervasively available. In Proceedings of the international conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology (ACE '07). ACM, 107--114. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1255047.1255069 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Persson, P., Blom, J. and Jung, Y. 2005. DigiDress: a field trial of an expressive social proximity application. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp'05). Springer-Verlag, 195--212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11551201_12 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Pfeiffer, M., Dünte, T., Schneegass, S., Alt, F. and Rohs, M. 2015. Cruise Control for Pedestrians: Controlling Walking Direction using Electrical Muscle Stimulation. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, 2505--2514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702190 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Seeburger, J., Foth, M. and Tjondronegoro, D. 2012. The sound of music: sharing song selections between collocated strangers in public urban places. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM '12). ACM. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2406367.2406409 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Szentgyorgyi, C., Terry, M. and Lank, E. 2008. Renegade gaming: practices surrounding social use of the Nintendo DS handheld gaming system. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, 1463--1472. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1357054.1357283 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Saarinen, P., Wäljas, M., Hännikäinen, M., Orsila, H. and Kiukkonen, N. 2010. User experience of social ad hoc networking: findings from a large-scale field trial of TWIN. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM '10). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1899475.1899485 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Yoon, J., Oishi, J., Nawyn, J., Kobayashi, K. and Gupta, N. 2004. FishPong: encouraging human-to-human interaction in informal social environments. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '04). ACM, 374--377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1031607.1031669 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Outlining the design space of playful interactions between nearby strangers

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      AcademicMindtrek '16: Proceedings of the 20th International Academic Mindtrek Conference
      October 2016
      483 pages
      ISBN:9781450343671
      DOI:10.1145/2994310

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 October 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate110of207submissions,53%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader