skip to main content
10.1145/3009977.3010070acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicvgipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluation of graph layout methods based on visual perception

Published: 18 December 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Node-link diagrams provide an intuitive way to explore networks and have inspired a large number of automated graph layout strategies that optimize aesthetic criteria. However, any particular drawing approach cannot fully satisfy all these criteria simultaneously. So the evaluation methods are designed to explore the advantages and disadvantages of different graph layout methods from these standards. Starting from the point of visual perception, this paper analyzes the node's visual importance based on a user experiment and designs a model to measure the node's visual importance. Then evaluate the pros and cons of graph layout methods by comparing the topological importance and visual importance of nodes. A heatmap-based visualization is used to provide visual feedback for the difference between the topological importance and visual importance of nodes. Meantime, a metric is built to quantify the difference precisely. Finally, experiments are done under different scale of data sets to further analyze the characteristics of these graph layout methods.

References

[1]
G. Albuquerque, M. Eisemann, and M. Magnor. Perception-based visual quality measures. In Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), 2011 IEEE Conference on, pages 13--20. IEEE, 2011.
[2]
V. Batagelj and A. Mrvar. Pajek datasets, 2006.
[3]
C. Bennett, J. Ryall, L. Spalteholz, and A. Gooch. The aesthetics of graph visualization. Computational Aesthetics, 2007:57--64, 2007.
[4]
L. C. Freeman. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, pages 35--41, 1977.
[5]
T. M. Fruchterman and E. M. Reingold. Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practice and experience, 21(11):1129--1164, 1991.
[6]
M. Jacomy, S. Heymann, T. Venturini, and M. Bastian. Forceatlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization. Medialab center of research, 560, 2011.
[7]
K. Marriott, H. Purchase, M. Wybrow, and C. Goncu. Memorability of visual features in network diagrams. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(12):2477--2485, 2012.
[8]
C. J. Melián and J. Bascompte. Food web cohesion. Ecology, 85(2):352--358, 2004.
[9]
M. Pohl, M. Schmitt, and S. Diehl. Comparing the readability of graph layouts using eyetracking and task-oriented analysis. In Computational Aesthetics, pages 49--56, 2009.
[10]
G. Sabidussi. The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika, 31(4):581--603, 1966.
[11]
Y. Wang, Q. Shen, D. Archambault, Z. Zhou, M. Zhu, S. Yang, and H. Qu. Ambiguityvis: Visualization of ambiguity in graph layouts. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 22(1):359--368, 2016.
[12]
C. Ware, H. Purchase, L. Colpoys, and M. McGill. Cognitive measurements of graph aesthetics. Information Visualization, 1(2):103--110, 2002.
[13]
D. B. West et al. Introduction to graph theory, volume 2. Prentice hall Upper Saddle River, 2001.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Fields, Bridges, and Foundations: How Researchers Browse Citation Network Visualizations2024 IEEE Visualization and Visual Analytics (VIS)10.1109/VIS55277.2024.00037(146-150)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2023)Integration with Visual Perception—Research on the Usability of a Data Visualization Interface Layout in Zero-Carbon Parks Based on Eye-Tracking TechnologySustainability10.3390/su15141110215:14(11102)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2023
  • (2023)An Empirical Study on Core Data Asset Identification in Data GovernanceBig Data and Cognitive Computing10.3390/bdcc70401617:4(161)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICVGIP '16: Proceedings of the Tenth Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing
December 2016
743 pages
ISBN:9781450347532
DOI:10.1145/3009977
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • Google Inc.
  • QI: Qualcomm Inc.
  • Tata Consultancy Services
  • NVIDIA
  • MathWorks: The MathWorks, Inc.
  • Microsoft Research: Microsoft Research

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 December 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. evaluation
  2. graph layout
  3. topological structure
  4. visual perception

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ICVGIP '16
Sponsor:
  • QI
  • MathWorks
  • Microsoft Research

Acceptance Rates

ICVGIP '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 95 of 286 submissions, 33%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 95 of 286 submissions, 33%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Fields, Bridges, and Foundations: How Researchers Browse Citation Network Visualizations2024 IEEE Visualization and Visual Analytics (VIS)10.1109/VIS55277.2024.00037(146-150)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2023)Integration with Visual Perception—Research on the Usability of a Data Visualization Interface Layout in Zero-Carbon Parks Based on Eye-Tracking TechnologySustainability10.3390/su15141110215:14(11102)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2023
  • (2023)An Empirical Study on Core Data Asset Identification in Data GovernanceBig Data and Cognitive Computing10.3390/bdcc70401617:4(161)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2023
  • (2020)Influence of Shape, Density, and Edge Crossings on the Perception of Graph DifferencesDiagrammatic Representation and Inference10.1007/978-3-030-54249-8_27(348-356)Online publication date: 17-Aug-2020
  • (2019)Perception of Differences in Directed Acyclic Graphs: Influence Factors & Cognitive StrategiesProceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics10.1145/3335082.3335083(57-64)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2019
  • (2018)The Perception of Graph Properties in Graph LayoutsComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1341037:3(169-181)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2018

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media