skip to main content
10.1145/3011077.3011099acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessoictConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Parametric procedures for image denoising with flexible prior model

Published:08 December 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this work, we present procedures for image denoising based on dynamic programming procedure for maximum a posteriori probability estimation. A new non-convex type regularization is used, with ability to flexibly set a priori preferences, using different penalties for various ranges of differences between the values of adjacent image elements. Proposed procedures can take into account heterogeneities and discontinuities in the source data.

References

  1. Rudin, L., Osher, S., and Fatemi, E. (1992). Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. In: Journal Physica D, Vol. 60, pp. 259--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Chambolle A., Caselles V., and Novaga M. (2011), Total Variation in Imaging, Handbook of Mathematical Methods in Imaging, Springer, New York., 1016-57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chaudhury, K., Sage D. and Unser, M. Fast O(1) bilateral filtering using trigonometric range kernels, 2011). In: IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 20(12), pp. 3376--3382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Florian Luisier, Thierry Blu, Michael Unser, 2007. A New SURE Approach to Image Denoising: Interscale Orthonormal Wavelet Thresholding. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 16(3): p. 593---606. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Portilla, J., et al., 2003. Image denoising using scale mixtures of gaussians in the wavelet domain. In: IEEE Transactions On Image Processing, Vol. 12, pp. 1338--1351. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Buades, A., Coll, B., Morel, J.M. (2005). A review of image denoising algorithms with a new one. Multiscale Modeling and Simulation, 4 (2), 490--530.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hammersley J. M., Clifford P.E., Markov random fields on finite graphs and lattices, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Mottl V., et al. (1998). Optimization techniques on pixel neighborhood graphs for image processing. In: Graph-Based Representations in Pattern Recognition. Computing, Supplement 12. Springer-Verlag/Wien, pp. 135--145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Blake A., Zisserman A. (1987). Visual Reconstruction. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1987, 232 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Ramin Zabih, et al., (2008), A comparative study of energy minimization methods for Markov Random Fields with smoothness-based priors, Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions, Vol.30 (6), pp. 1068--1080. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Nikolova M., Michael K., and Tam C.P. (2010), Fast Nonconvex Nonsmooth Minimization Methods for Image Restoration and Reconstruction. In: IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 3073--3088. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Pham C. T. and Kopylov A. V. (2015), Multi-Quadratic Dynamic Programming Procedure of Edge-Preserving Denoising for Medical Images, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XL-5/W6, (2015), pp. 101--06.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Stevenson R., Stevenson D.E. (1990), Fitting curves with discontinuities. Proc. of the first international workshop on robust computer vision, pp. 127--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Fleury G., De la Rosa J. I. (2004), Bootstrap Methods for a Measurement Estimation Problem // IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 55(3). P. 820--827.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Bouman, C., Sauer K. (1993), A Generalized Gaussian Image Model for Edge-Preserving Map Estimation, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, Vol. 2 (3). P. 296--310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Besag J. (1986) On the Statistical Analysis of Dirty Pictures, ournal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B), Vol. 48, P. 259--302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kopylov A., et al. (2010), A Signal Processing Algorithm Based on Parametric Dynamic Programming, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 6134 (2010). P.280--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kopylov A.V., Parametric dynamic programming procedures for edge preserving in smoothing of signals and images (2005), Pattern recognition and image analysis,15,: p. 227--229.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kalman R. E., Bucy R.S., (1961) New Results in Linear Filtering and Prediction Theory. Journal of Basic Engineering, Vol. 83. P. 95--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Dvoenko S. D. (2009) Clustering Sets Based on Distances and Proximities between Its Elements, Sib. Zh. Ind. Mat., 12:1 (2009), 61--73 (In Russian).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Bovik A. C., Wang Z. (2006), Modern Image Quality Assessment, Synthesis Lectures on Image, Video, and Multimedia Processing, Morgan & Claypool Publishers (2006), 156 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Kopylov A.V. Dynamic programming procedures for image analysis // Proceedings of the Eight IASTED International Conference Intelligent systems and control, Cambridge, USA, ACTA Press. (2005). P. 404--409.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Parametric procedures for image denoising with flexible prior model

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SoICT '16: Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Information and Communication Technology
      December 2016
      442 pages
      ISBN:9781450348157
      DOI:10.1145/3011077

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 December 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SoICT '16 Paper Acceptance Rate58of132submissions,44%Overall Acceptance Rate147of318submissions,46%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader