skip to main content
10.1145/301136.301178acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Implementation and evaluation of rational communicative behavior in coordinated defense

Published:01 April 1999Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.M. Barbuceanu. Coordinating agents by role based social constraints and conversation plans. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 16-21, Providence, Rhode Island, July 1997. AAAI Press/MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.P. R. Cohen and H. J. Levesque. Rational interaction as the basis for communication. In P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. E. Pollack, editors, Intentions in Communication. MIT Press, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.E. H. Durfee and T. A. Montgomery. MICE: A flexible testbed for intelligent coordination experiments. In Proceedings of the 1989 Distributed AI Workshop, pages 25-40, Sept. 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.P. J. Gmytrasiewicz and E. H. Durfee. A rigorous, operational formalization of recursive modeling, in Proceedings o/the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pages 125-132, Menlo Park, 1995. AAAI Press/The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.P. J. Gmytrasiewicz and E. H. Durfee. Rational interaction in multiagent environments: Communication. Submitted for publication, 1997. Available in postscript from http://www-cse.uta, edu/~piotr/piotr.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.P. J. Gmytrasiewicz, E. H. Durfee, and D. K. Wehe. The utility of communication in coordinating intelligent agents. In Proceedings of the Ninth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 166-172, July 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.P. J. Gmytrasiewicz, S. Noh, and T. Kellogg. Bayesian update of recusive agent models. An International Journal 'of User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 8(1/2):49-69, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.B. J. Grosz and C. Sidner. Plans for discourse. In P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. E. Pollack, editors, Intentions in Communication. MIT Press, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Y. Labrou and T. Finin. A semantics approach for kqml- a general purpose communication language for software agents, in Proceedings o/the Third International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Nov. 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.S. Noh and P. J. Gmytrasiewicz. Agent modeling in antiair defense. In A. Jameson, C. Paris, and C. Tasso, editors, Proceedings of the Sizth International Conference on User Modeling, pages 389-400, New York, June 1997. Springer-Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.S. Noh and P. J. Gmytrasiewicz. Coordination and befief update in a distributed anti-air environment. In Proceedings of the 31st Hawai'i International Conference on System Sciences for the Uncertainty Modeling and Approximate Reasoning minitrack, volume V, pages 142-151, Los Alamitos, CA, Jan 1998. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.S. Noh and P. J. Gmytrasiewicz. Rational communicative behavior in anti-air defense. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multi Agent Systems, pages 214-221, Los Alamitos, CA, July 1998. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.J. Pearl. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, CA, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.A. Quintero. Multi-agent system protocol language specification. Technical report, Universidad de los Andes, Colombia, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.S. J. Russell and P. Norvig. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.I. A. Smith and P. R. Cohen. Toward a semantics for an agent communications language based on speech-acts. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 24-31, Portland, Oregon, Aug. 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.M. Tambe. Agent architectures for flexible, practical teamwork. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 22- 28, Providence, Rhode Island, 1997. AAAI Press/MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Implementation and evaluation of rational communicative behavior in coordinated defense

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            AGENTS '99: Proceedings of the third annual conference on Autonomous Agents
            April 1999
            441 pages
            ISBN:158113066X
            DOI:10.1145/301136

            Copyright © 1999 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 April 1999

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate182of599submissions,30%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader