skip to main content
10.1145/3019612.3019648acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

SmartSen: smart sensing for enhancing real-time activity recognition in phone-based interactive CPS

Published:03 April 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Using mobile devices to enhance users interaction with CPS has many potential benefits for healthcare applications. Recent research has looked at how to recognize human activities using smartphones, to indicate health status. But little attention has been paid to automatically identify the activity habits of individuals in real-time. Of course, the energy constraint in smartphones must be considered during the design of such cyber-physical recognition systems. In this paper, we propose a prediction-based smart sensing strategy that is energy efficient and works in real-time. By making use of the temporal correlation property of real-world phenomena, an adaptive k-order Markov chain based prediction algorithm is proposed to avoid continuous sensing so that significant energy savings can be achieved. The prediction results are analyzed online in real-time, to ensure that the system can track an individual's behavior pattern and provide timely response to changes in behavior. Real-world experiments using our prototype show that such recognition oriented CPS systems can not only achieve energy savings, but also converge to steady state with high individual recognition accuracy, in a real-time manner.

References

  1. A. Anjum and M. U. Ilyas. Activity recognition using smartphone sensors. In IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC 2013), pages 914--919, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. L. Bao and S. S. Intille. Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. In Pervasive computing, pages 1--17. Springer, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. T. Brezmes, J. L. Gorricho, and J. Cotrina. Activity Recognition from Accelerometer Data on a Mobile Phone. Distributed Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Bioinformatics, Soft Computing, and Ambient Assisted Living, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Campbell and T. Choudhury. From smart to cognitive phones. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 11(3):7--11, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. L. Dai and P. Basu. Energy and delivery capacity of wireless sensor networks with random duty-cycles. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications, volume 8, pages 3503--3510, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. M. C. Gonzalez, C. A. Hidalgo, and A.-L. Barabasi. Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature, 453(7196):779--782, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Y. W. Jong, P. C. Hsiu, S. W. Cheng, and T. W. Kuo. A semantics-aware design for mounting remote sensors on mobile systems. In Proceedings of the 53rd IEEE/ACM Annual Design Automation Conference (DAC), June 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. M. Khan, Y.-K. Lee, S. Lee, and T.-S. Kim. Human activity recognition via an accelerometer-enabled-smartphone using kernel discriminant analysis. In Proceedings of IEEE 5th International Conference on Future Information Technology (FutureTech), pages 1--6, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. A. M. Khan, Y. K. Lee, S. Y. Lee, and T. S. Kim. A triaxial accelerometer-based physical-activity recognition via augmented-signal features and a hierarchical recognizer. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 14(5):1166 -- 1172, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Krause, M. Ihmig, E. Rankin, D. Leong, S. Gupta, D. Siewiorek, A. Smailagic, M. Deisher, and U. Sengupta. Trading off prediction accuracy and power consumption for context-aware wearable computing. In Proceedings of ISWC, pages 20--26, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. N. C. Krishnan, D. Colbry, C. Juillard, and S. Panchanathan. Real time human activity recognition using tri-axial accelerometers. In Sensors, signals and information processing workshop, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. R. Kwapisz, G. M. Weiss, and S. A. Moore. Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 12(2):74--82, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. R. Kwapisz, G. M. Weiss, and S. A. Moore. Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers. Proceeding of ACM SIGKDD Conference of Knowledge Discovery and, Data Mining, 12(2):74--82, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. W. Lockhart and G. M. Weiss. Limitations with activity recognition methodology & data sets. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication, volume 8, pages 747--756, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. E. Miluzzo, N. D. Lane, K. Fodor, f, R. Peterson, H. Lu, M. Musolesi, S. B. Eisenman, X. Zheng, and A. T. Campbell. Sensing meets mobile social networks: The design, implementation and evaluation of the cenceme application. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys), pages 337--350, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S.-M. Qin, H. Verkasalo, M. Mohtaschemi, T. Hartonen, and M. Alava. Patterns, entropy, and predictability of human mobility and life. PloS one, 7(12):e51353, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. N. Ravi, N. Dandekar, P. Mysore, and M. L. Littman. Activity recognition from accelerometer data. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence(IAAI), pages 1541--1546, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. C. Shannon. Prediction and entropy of printed english. Bell System Technical Journal, 30(1):50 -- 64, 1951. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. M. Shoaib, H. Scholten, and P. J. Havinga. Towards physical activity recognition using smartphone sensors. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing and 10th International Conference on Autonomic and Trusted, Computing (UIC/ATC), pages 80--87, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. C. Song, Z. Qu, N. Blumm, and A.-L. Barabási. Limits of predictability in human mobility. Science, 327(5968):1018--1021, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. V. Srinivasan and T. Phan. An accurate two-tier classifier for efficient duty-cycling of smartphone activity recognition systems. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Third International Workshop on Sensing Applications on Mobile Phones, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. V. Q. Viet, H. M. Thang, and D. Choi. Adaptive energy-saving strategy for activity recognition on mobile phone. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT), pages 95--100, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. W. Wu, S. Dasgupta, E. E. Ramirez, C. Peterson, and G. J. Norman. Classification accuracies of physical activities using smartphone motion sensors. Journal of medical Internet research, 14(5):e130, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Z. Yan, V. Subbaraju, D. Chakraborty, A. Misra, and K. Aberer. Energy-efficient continuous activity recognition on mobile phones: An activity-adaptive approach. In Proceedings of the 2012 16th Annual International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC), pages 17--24, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. J. Yang. Toward physical activity diary: motion recognition using simple acceleration features with mobile phones. In First International Workshop on Interactive Multimedia for Consumer Electronics at ACM Multimedia, pages 1--10, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. O. Yurur, C. H. Liu, X. Liu, and W. Moreno. Adaptive sampling and duty cycling for smartphone accelerometer. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS), pages 511--518, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. O. Yurur, C.-H. Liu, and W. Moreno. Unsupervised posture detection by smartphone accelerometer. Electronics Letters, 49(8):562--564, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. P. Zappi, C. Lombriser, T. Stiefmeier, E. Farella, D. Roggen, L. Benini, and G. Tröster. Activity recognition from on-body sensors: accuracy-power trade-off by dynamic sensor selection. In Wireless sensor networks, pages 17--33. Springer, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Y.-L. Zheng, X.-R. Ding, C. C. Y. Poon, B. P. L. Lo, H. Zhang, X.-L. Zhou, G.-Z. Yang, N. Zhao, and Y.-T. Zhang. Unobtrusive sensing and wearable devices for health informatics. IEEE Transactions On Biomedical Engineering, 61:1538--1554, May 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. SmartSen: smart sensing for enhancing real-time activity recognition in phone-based interactive CPS

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SAC '17: Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Computing
      April 2017
      2004 pages
      ISBN:9781450344869
      DOI:10.1145/3019612

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 April 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader