skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025532acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Women's Safety in Public Spaces: Examining the Efficacy of Panic Buttons in New Delhi

Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a qualitative inquiry through the lens of feminist Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) into women's perceptions of personal safety in New Delhi, India. Since a brutal gang-rape incident took place in Delhi in December 2012 and received global attention, women's safety has been the focus of much attention India-wide. In April 2016, the Indian government issued a mandate that all mobile phones sold in India 2017 onwards must include a panic button for women's safety. We draw on interview and survey data to examine women's responses to the mandate, also investigating what factors influence their perceptions of safety, positively and negatively. Our findings indicate that women's sense of safety may be deconstructed into a multitude of factors--personal, public, social, technological--that must align for this sense of safety to be preserved. We then discuss the implications these factors have for the success and (re-)design of the panic button and similar interventions.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p3340-karusala.mp4

mp4

170.5 MB

References

  1. Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Steven J Jackson, Nova Ahmed, Hasan Shahid Ferdous, Md Rashidujjaman Rifat, ASM Rizvi, Shamir Ahmed, and Rifat Sabbir Mansur. 2014. Protibadi: a platform for fighting sexual harassment in urban bangladesh. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 2695--2704. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mohammed Eunus Ali, Shabnam Basera Rishta, Lazima Ansari, Tanzima Hashem, and Ahamad Imtiaz Khan. 2015. SafeStreet: empowering women against street harassment using a privacy-aware location based application. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. ACM, 24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. John Ayoade, Preetika Anand, and Varunesh Rao. 2007. RFID Location Tracking System for Enhancing Police Services. In ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 19--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Madeline Balaam, Rob Comber, Ed Jenkins, Selina Sutton, and Andrew Garbett. 2015. FeedFinder: A Location-Mapping Mobile Application for Breastfeeding Women. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1709--1718. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702328 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1301--1310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jan Blom, Divya Viswanathan, Mirjana Spasojevic, Janet Go, Karthik Acharya, and Robert Ahonius. 2010. Fear and the city: role of mobile services in harnessing safety and security in urban use contexts. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1841--1850. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Margaret Burnett, Anicia Peters, Charles Hill, and Noha Elarief. 2016. Finding Gender-Inclusiveness Software Issues with GenderMag: A Field Investigation. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2586--2598. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858274 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hafedh Chourabi, Taewoo Nam, Shawn Walker, J Ramon Gil-Garcia, Sehl Mellouli, Karine Nahon, Theresa A Pardo, and Hans Jochen Scholl. 2012. Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. In System Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on. IEEE, 2289--2297.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jill P Dimond. 2012. Feminist HCI for real: Designing technology in support of a social movement. Ph.D. Dissertation. GA Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jill P Dimond, Michaelanne Dye, Daphne LaRose, and Amy S Bruckman. 2013. Hollaback!: the role of storytelling online in a social movement organization. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 477--490.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jill P Dimond, Casey Fiesler, and Amy S Bruckman. 2011. Domestic violence and information communication technologies. Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (2011), 413--421.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Daniel Drache and Jennifer Velagic. 2013. A report on sexual violence journalism in four leading Indian English language publications before and after the Delhi bus rape. Available at SSRN 2277310 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Susan M. Dray, Daniela K. Busse, Anke Marei Brock, Anicia N. Peters, Shaowen Bardzell, Allison Druin, Margaret M. Burnett, Elizabeth F. Churchill, Gayna Williams, Karen Holtzblatt, and Diane Murray. 2014. Perspectives on Gender and Product Design. In CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 53--56. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2559218 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Susan M. Dray, Andrea Peer, Anke M. Brock, Anicia Peters, Shaowen Bardzell, Margaret Burnett, Elizabeth Churchill, Erika Poole, and Daniela K. Busse. 2013. Exploring the Representation of Women Perspectives in Technologies. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2447--2454. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468799 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Casey Fiesler, Shannon Morrison, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2016. An Archive of Their Own: A Case Study of Feminist HCI and Values in Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2574--2585. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858409 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Leo A Goodman. 1961. Snowball sampling. The annals of mathematical statistics (1961), 148--170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Nadia Ilahi. 2009. Gendered contestations: An analysis of street harassment in Cairo and its implications for womens access to public spaces. Surfacing: An Interdisciplinary Journal for Gender in the Global South 2 (2009), 56--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Cristina Kadar and Irena Pletikosa Cvijikj. 2014. CityWatch: the personalized crime prevention assistant. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. ACM, 260--261. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Tzu-I Lee, Yih-Harn Chiang, Jiayi Guo, Mu-Tsz Chen, and Yue Chen. 2016. Dot-it: Managing Nausea and Vomiting for A Peaceful Pregnancy with Personal Pattern Exploration. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 20--25. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2890631 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Sharmila Lodhia. 2015. From living corpse to India's daughter: Exploring the social, political and legal landscape of the 2012 Delhi gang rape. In Women's Studies International Forum, Vol. 50. Elsevier, 89--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Niharika Mandhana and Anjani Trivedi. 2012. Indians Outraged Over Rape on Moving Bus in New Delhi. (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Wendy March, Dawn Nafus, Laurel Swan, and Alex S Taylor. 2008. Night and darkness: interaction after dark. In CHI'08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3985--3988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Amanda Menking and Ingrid Erickson. 2015. The Heart Work of Wikipedia: Gendered, Emotional Labor in the World's Largest Online Encyclopedia. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 207--210. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702514 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Sharan B Merriam. 2002. Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. Jossey-Bass Inc Pub.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Michael Muller. 2011. Feminism asks the Who questions in HCI. Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (2011), 447--449. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. OSAC. 2015. India 2015 Crime and Safety Report: New Delhi. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Mark Phillips, Fargol Mostofian, Rajeev Jetly, Nazar Puthukudy, Kim Madden, and Mohit Bhandari. 2015. Media coverage of violence against women in India: a systematic study of a high profile rape case. BMC women's health 15, 1 (2015), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Gabriela T. Richard and Yasmin B. Kafai. 2016. Blind Spots in Youth DIY Programming: Examining Diversity in Creators, Content, and Comments Within the Scratch Online Community. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1473--1485. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858590 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Heather Rosenfeld and Elsa Noterman. 2014. Safe space: Towards a reconceptualization. Antipode 46, 5 (2014), 1346--1365. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Christine Satchell and Marcus Foth. 2011. Welcome to the jungle: HCI after dark. In CHI'11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 753--762. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Bryan Semaan and Gloria Mark. 2011. Creating a context of trust with ICTs: restoring a sense of normalcy in the environment. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 255--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Prachi Sharma, MK Unnikrishnan, and Abhishek Sharma. 2014. Sexual violence in India: addressing gaps between policy and implementation. Health policy and planning (2014), czu015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Sanjay Kumar Singh. 2008. The diffusion of mobile phones in India. Telecommunications Policy 32, 9 (2008), 642--651. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Carmen Stavrositu and S. Shyam Sundar. 2008. Can Blogs Empower Women?: Designing Agency-enhancing and Community-building Interfaces. In CHI '08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '08). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2781--2786. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1358628.1358761 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. S Sterling. 2013. Designing for trauma: the roles of ICTD in combating violence against women (VAW). In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Communications Technologies and Development: Notes-Volume 2. ACM, 159--162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Kalpana Viswanath and Surabhi Tandon Mehrotra. 2007. "Shall We Go out"? Women's Safety in Public Spaces in Delhi. Economic and political weekly (2007), 1542--1548.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Yi-Chia Wang, Moira Burke, and Robert E. Kraut. 2013. Gender, Topic, and Audience Response: An Analysis of User-generated Content on Facebook. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 31--34. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470659 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Huizhong Wu. 2016. India says every phone must have a panic button by 2017. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Chelsea Young. 2014. HarassMap: using crowdsourced data to map sexual harassment in Egypt. Technology Innovation Management Review 4, 3 (2014), 7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Women's Safety in Public Spaces: Examining the Efficacy of Panic Buttons in New Delhi

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      7138 pages
      ISBN:9781450346559
      DOI:10.1145/3025453

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader