skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025572acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Internet Search Roles of Adults in their Homes

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Internet search is one of the major activities that American adults engage in online. Building on studies of youth Internet search roles, this paper investigates adults' online information seeking processes within the home. Through in-home interviews and observations of search task performance with 40 adult participants, we identify and describe characteristics of 9 search roles. By comparing these roles with those of youths, we explain how previously identified roles, such as Power Searcher and Social Searcher, have evolved in adult populations, and how new roles, such as Efficient Searcher and Interest-driven Searcher, have emerged. We also review the challenges and benefits associated with search roles and their potential impacts on search performance. The findings of this study provide a better understanding of how contextual factors influence search roles in relation to ELIS, what can be learned from search roles, and opportunities to support different search roles.

References

  1. Paul André, m.c. schraefel, Jamie Teevan, and Susan T. Dumais. 2009. Discovery is never by chance: Design for (un)serendipity. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C '09). 305--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Carl Auerbach and Louise B. Silverstein. 2003. Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis. NYU Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Anne Aula, Rehan M. Khan, and Zhiwei Guan. 2010. How does search behavior change as search becomes more difficult? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'10). 35--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Paul Bennett, Alexander Fishkov, and Emre Kiciman. 2015. Persona-ization: Searching on behalf of others. In SIGIR 2015 International Workshop on Social Personalisation & Search (SPS'15).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dania Bilal and Joe Kirby. 2002. Differences and similarities in information seeking: Children and adults as Web users. Information Processing & Management, 38(5), 649--670. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Donald O. Case. 2007. Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior. Elsevier/Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chun Wei Choo, Brian Detlor, and Dan Turnbull. 2000. Information seeking on the Web: An integrated model of browsing and searching. First Monday, 5(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Allison Druin, Elizabeth Foss, Hilary Hutchinson, Evan Golub, and Leshell Hatley. 2010. Children's roles using keyword search interfaces at home. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'10). 413--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Robert W. Fairlie. 2012. The effects of home access to technology on computer skills: Evidence from a field experiment. Information Economics and Policy, 24, 243--253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Raya Fidel. 1991. Searchers' Selection of Search Keys: III. Searching Styles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 42(7), 515--527.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Karen E. Fisher and Charles M. Naumer. 2006. Information grounds: Theoretical basis and empirical findings on information flow in social settings. In New directions in human information behavior, Amanda Spink and Charles Cole (eds.). Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 93--111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Elizabeth Foss. 2014. Internet Searching in Children and Adolescents: A Longitudinal Framework of Youth Search Roles. Ph.D. dissertation, University of MD, College Park, MD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Elizabeth Foss and Allison Druin. 2014. Children's Internet Search: Using Roles to Understand Children's Search Behavior. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Elizabeth Foss, Allison Druin, Robin Brewer, Phillip Lo, Luis Sanchez, Evan Golub, and Hilary Hutchinson. 2012. Children's search roles at home: Implications for designers, researchers, educators, and parents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 558--573. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Elizabeth Foss, Allison Druin, Jason Yip, Whitney Ford, Evan Golub, and Hilary Hutchinson. 2013. Adolescent search roles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(1), 173--189. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Nigel Ford, Barry Eaglestone, Andrew Madden, and Martin Whittle. 2009. Web searching by the "general public": An individual differences perspective. Journal of Documentation, 65(4), 632--667.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Eric Gleave, Howard T. Welser, Thomas M. Lento, and Marc A. Smith. 2009. A conceptual and operational definition of 'social role' in online community. In Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'09). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Elisheva F. Gross. 2004. Adolescent Internet use: What we expect, what teens report. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25(6), 633--649.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Eszter Hargittai. 2002. Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skills. First Monday, 7(4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Eszter Hargittai and Amanda Hinnant, A. 2005. Toward a social framework for information seeking. In New Directions in Human Information Behavior. Edited by Amanda Spink and Charles Cole. NY: Springer. 55--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jannica Heinström. 2005. Fast surfing, broad scanning and deep diving: The influence of personality and study approach on students' information-seeking behavior. Journal of Documentation, 61 (2), 228--247Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. John B. Horrigan and Maeve Duggan. 2015. Home Broad Band 2015. Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project, WA, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ingrid Hsieh-Yee. 2001. Research on Web search behavior. Library & Information Science Research, 23(2), 167--185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Bernard J. Jansen and Amanda Spink. 2006. How are we searching the world wide web? A comparison of nine search engine transaction logs. Information Processing and Management, 42(1), 248--263. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Bryan Kalms. 2008. Household information practices: How and why householders process and manage information. Information Research, 13(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Melanie Kellar, Carolyn Watters, and Michael Shepherd. 2007. A field study characterizing webbased information-seeking tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7), 999--1018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jeonghyun Kim. 2009. Describing and predicting information-seeking behavior on the web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 679--693. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Meredith Ringel Morris. 2013. Collaborative search revisited. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13). 1181--1192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Young Park and John B. Black. 2007. Identifying the impact of domain knowledge and cognitive style on web-based information search behavior. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(1), 15--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Karen E. Pettigrew. 1999. Waiting for chiropody: contextual results from an ethnographic study of the information behaviour among attendees at community clinics. Information Processing & Management, 35(6), 801--817. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Pew Research Center. 2010. Millennials: Confident. Connected. Open to Change. Pew Research Center's Social & Demographic Trends Project, WA, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Kristen Purcell, Joanna Brenner, and Lee Rainie. 2012. Search Engine Use 2012. Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project, WA, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Tye Rattenbury, Dawn Nafus, and ken anderson. 2008. Plastic: A metaphor for integrated technologies. In Proceedings of Ubiquotous Computing (UbiComp '08). 232--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Soo Young Rieh. 2004. On the web at home: Information seeking and Web searching in the home environment. Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(8), 743--753. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Johnny Saldana. 2012. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. SAGE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Reijo Savolainen. 1995. Everyday Life Information Seeking: Approaching Information Seeking in the Context of "Way of Life." Library & Information Science Research, 17(3), 259--294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Reijo Savolainen. 2007. Information behaviour and information practice: reviewing the "umbrella concepts" of information-seeking studies. Library Quarterly, 77(2), 109--132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Debra J. Slone. 2003. Internet search approaches: The influence of age, search goals, and experience. Library & Information Science Research, 25(4), 403--418.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Amanda Spink and Charles Cole. 2001. Introduction to the special issue: Everyday life information-seeking research. Library & Information Science Research, 23, 301--304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Amanda Spink, Howard Greisdorf, and Judy Bateman. 1998. From highly relevant to not relevant: Examining different regions of relevance. Information Processing and Management, 34(5), 599--621. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Beth St. Jean, Soo Young Rieh, Young-Mi Kim, and Ji Yeon Yang. 2012. An analysis of the information behaviors, goals, and intentions of frequent Internet users: Findings from online activity diaries. First Monday, 17(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Alexander JAM van Deursen and Jan AGM van Dijk. 2010. Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 13(6), 893--911.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Alladi Venkatesh. 1996. Computers and other interactive technologies for the home. Communications of the ACM, 39(12), 47--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Alladi Venkatesh, Norman Stolzoff, Eric Shih, and Sanjoy Mazumdar. 2001. The home of the future: An ethnographic study of new information technologies in the home. Advances in Consumer Research, 28(1), 8897.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Rong Wang, Suzanne M. Bianchi, Sara B. Raley. 2005. Teenagers? Internet use and family rules: A research note. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 12491258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Ryen W. White and Steven M. Drucker. 2007. Investigating behavioral variability in web search. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '07). 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Internet Search Roles of Adults in their Homes

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 2017
          7138 pages
          ISBN:9781450346559
          DOI:10.1145/3025453

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 2 May 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

          Upcoming Conference

          CHI '24
          CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 11 - 16, 2024
          Honolulu , HI , USA

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader