skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025581acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

The Geometry of Storytelling: Theatrical Use of Space for 360-degree Videos and Virtual Reality

Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

360-degree filming and head-mounted displays (HMDs) give recorded media a new sense of space. Theatre practitioners' expertise in manipulating spatial interactions has much to contribute to immersive recorded content. Four theatre directors led teams of three actors to stage the same scene for both immersive theatre and for 360-degree filming. Each team was recorded performing the scene at least six times, three in each condition, to extract actors' coordinates. This study establishes how to quantify theatre practitioners' use of spatial interactions and examines the spatial adaptations made when transferring these relationships to 360-degree filming.

Staging for a 360-degree camera compared to staging for an audience member had shorter distances from the camera and between performers, along with fewer instances of the camera being in the middle of the action. Across all groups, interpersonal distance between characters and between the audience/camera dropped at the end of the scene when the characters come together as a team, suggesting that elements of Proxemics may be applicable to narrative performance.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p4468-pope.mp4

mp4

150.2 MB

References

  1. 2014. Google Cardboard. (25 June 2014). https://vr.google.com/cardboard/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2015. Samsung Gear VR. (27 November 2015). http://www.samsung.com/global/galaxy/gear-vr/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2015. Theta S 12. (September 2015). https://theta360.com/uk/about/theta/s.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 2016. 8i. (2016). http://8i.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 2016. AR/VR investment hits $1.1 billion already in 2016. (March 2016). http://www.digi-capital.com/news/2016/03/arvr-investment-hits-1-1-billion-already-in-2016/#.V7MGRJMrJ1MGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 2016. Dane Galpin Industrial Design 6: September 2012. (31 August 2016). http://danegalpin.blogspot.com/2012_09_01_archive.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 2016. Hololens. (2016). https://www.microsoft.com/microsoft-hololens/en-usGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 2016. HTC Vive. (5 April 2016). https://www.htcvive.com/uk/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 2016. MATLAB R2016a. (2016). http://uk.mathworks.com/products/'s_tid=gn_psGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 2016. Oculus Rift. (28 March 2016). https://www.oculus.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 2016. proxemics. (31 August 2016). https://sunkyungoh.wordpress.com/tag/proxemics/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 2016. Virtual Reality Has a Storytelling Problem and Theater Will Save It. (8 May 2016). http://uploadvr.com/virtual-reality-storytelling-problem-theater-will-save/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jeremy N. Bailenson, Jim Blascovich, Andrew C. Beall, and Jack M. Loomis. 2001. Equilibrium theory revisited: Mutual gaze and personal space in virtual environments. 10, 6 (2001), 583--598. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=6790745 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jeremy N. Bailenson, Jim Blascovich, Andrew C. Beall, and Jack M. Loomis. 2003. Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. 29, 7 (2003), 819--833. http://psp.sagepub.com/content/29/7/819.shortGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mark Brown. 2016. National Theatre creates virtual reality studio for new projects. (2 August 2016). https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2016/aug/02/national-theatre-creates-virtual-reality-studio-for-new-projectsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Cirque du Soleil. 2015. Zarkana. (18 April 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. M. Cristani, G. Paggetti, A. Vinciarelli, L. Bazzani, G. Menegaz, and V. Murino. Towards Computational Proxemics: Inferring Social Relations from Interpersonal Distances. In 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT) and 2011 IEEE Third Inernational Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom) (2011-10). 290--297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Colombine Gardair, Patrick G. T. Healey, and Martin Welton. Performing places. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Creativity and cognition (2011). ACM, 51--60. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2069629 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Edward T. Hall. 1963. A System for the Notation of Proxemic Behavior. 65, 5 (1963), 1003--1026. http://www.jstor.org/stable/668580Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Rich Haridy. 2016. How VR is rewriting the rules of storytelling. (2016). http://newatlas.com/vr-storytelling-darnell-brillhart/45010/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Adam Kendon. 1976. The F-formation system: The spatial organization of social encounters. 6 (1976), 291--296.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Yukari Konishi, Nobuhisa Hanamitsu, Kouta Minamizawa, Ayahiko Sato, and Tetsuya Mizuguchi. Synesthesia Suit: The Full Body Immersive Experience. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2016 VR Village (2016) (SIGGRAPH '16). ACM, 20:1--20:1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lorenza Mondada. 2009. Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space. 41, 10 (2009), 1977--1997. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216608002300Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Michael Naimark. 2016. VR Cinematography Studies for Google. (2016). https://medium.com/@michaelnaimark/vr-cinematography-studies-for-google-8a2681317b3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Noah Nelson. 2015. VR: Finding The Storytelling Language of A New Medium. (13 August 2015). http://www.huffingtonpost.com/turnstyle/vr-finding-the-storytelli_b_7985682.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Oscar Raby. 2016. Turning Forest. (April 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ivan E. Sutherland. A Head-mounted Three Dimensional Display. In Proceedings of the December 9-11, 1968, Fall Joint Computer Conference, Part I (1968) (AFIPS '68 (Fall, part I)). ACM, 757--764. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The Geometry of Storytelling: Theatrical Use of Space for 360-degree Videos and Virtual Reality

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader