skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025589acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Crafting a View of Self-Tracking Data in the Clinical Visit

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

When self-tracking encounters clinical practices, the data is reshaped by goals and expertise that exist within a healthcare framework. To uncover these shaping practices, we provided a Fitbit Zip step-count sensor to nine patients with Parkinson's disease. Each patient wore the sensor for four weeks and then returned for a clinical visit with their neurologist. Our analysis focuses on this first clinical visit after four weeks of data had been collected. Our use of conversation analysis of both talk and action makes visible the practices engaged in by both collaborative members to 'craft a view' of the data toward shared decision making. Our findings reveal the deliberate guiding of attention to specific interpretations of the data through both talk and actions and we explain how our systematic analysis has uncovered tools for the mutually beneficial crafting practices of the clinician and patient.

References

  1. Margunn Aanestad. 2003. The Camera as an Actor. Design-in-Use of Telemedicine Infrastructure in Surgery. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 12, 1: 1--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Rikke Aarhus, Stinne Aaløkke Ballegaard, and Thomas Riisgaard Hansen. 2009. The eDiary: Bridging home and hospital through healthcare technology. In ECSCW 2009. Springer London, London, 63--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Morana Alac. 2008. Working with Brain Scans: Digital Images and Gestural Interaction in fMRI Laboratory. Social Studies of Science 38, 4: 483--508.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Tariq Andersen, Pernille Bjørn, Finn Kensing, and Jonas Moll. 2011. Designing for collaborative interpretation in telemonitoring: Re-introducing patients as diagnostic agents. International Journal of Medical Informatics 80, 8: e112--e126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Arlene S. Bierman. 2001. Functional status: the six vital sign. Journal of general internal medicine 16, 11: 785--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Chia-Fang Chung, Kristin Dew, Allison M. Cole, et al. 2016. Boundary Negotiating Artifacts in Personal Informatics: Patient-Provider Collaboration with Patient-Generated Data. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing CSCW '16, 768--784. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Terry Ellis, James T. Cavanaugh, Gammon M. Earhart, et al. 2011. Factors associated with exercise behavior in people with Parkinson disease. Physical therapy 91, 12: 1838--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Terry Ellis, Nancy K. Latham, Tamara R. DeAngelis, Cathi A. Thomas, Marie Saint-Hilaire, and Timothy W. Bickmore. 2013. Feasibility of a virtual exercise coach to promote walking in community-dwelling persons with Parkinson disease. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation / Association of Academic Physiatrists 92, 6: 472--81--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Brittany Fiore-Gartland and Gina Neff. 2015. Communication, Mediation, and the Expectations of Data: Data Valences Across Health and Wellness Communities. International Journal of Communication 9, 0: 19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Claire F. Fitzsimons, Graham Baker, Stuart R. Gray, et al. 2012. Does physical activity counselling enhance the effects of a pedometer-based intervention over the long-term: 12-month findings from the Walking for Wellbeing in the west study. BMC Public Health 12, 1: 206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Lauren J. Frensham, Dorota M. Zarnowiecki, Gaynor Parfitt, Sharron King, and James Dollman. 2014. The experiences of participants in an innovative online resource designed to increase regular walking among rural cancer survivors: a qualitative pilot feasibility study. Supportive Care in Cancer 22, 7: 1923--1929.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Merrill Funk and E. Laurette Taylor. Pedometer-Based Walking Interventions for Free-Living Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Nicholas D. Gilson, Guy Faulkner, Marie H. Murphy, et al. 2013. Walk@Work: An automated intervention to increase walking in university employees not achieving 10,000 daily steps. Preventive medicine 56, 5: 283--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Charles Goodwin. 1981. Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Charles Goodwin. 1994. Professional Vision. American Anthropologist 96, 3: 606--633.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Christian Heath, Jon Hindmarsh, and Paul Luff. 2010. Video in Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Christian Heath and Paul Luff. 2012. Embodied Action and Organizational Activity. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, 281--307.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Alexa Hepburn and Galina B. Bolden. 2012. The Conversation Analytic Approach to Transcription. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, 57--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Stefan Hirschauer. 1991. The Manufacture of Bodies in Surgery. Social Studies of Science 21, 2: 279--319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Kelly Joyce. 2005. Appealing Images: Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Production of Authoritative Knowledge. Social Studies of Science 35, 3: 437--462.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Bonnie Kaplan. 1995. Objectification and negotiation in interpreting clinical images: implications for computer-based patient records. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 7, 5: 439--454.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Yoojung Kim, Sookyoung Ji, Hyunjeong Lee, Jeong-Whun Kim, Sooyoung Yoo, and Joongseek Lee. 2016. "My Doctor is Keeping an Eye on Me!" In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI '16, 5620--5631. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Clemens Scott Kruse, Darcy A. Argueta, Lynsey Lopez, and Anju Nair. 2015. Patient and provider attitudes toward the use of patient portals for the management of chronic disease: a systematic review. Journal of medical Internet research 17, 2: e40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Lonneke M. L. de Lau and Monique M. B. Breteler. 2006. Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease. The Lancet Neurology 5, 6: 525--535.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Charlotte P. Lee. 2007. Boundary Negotiating Artifacts: Unbinding the Routine of Boundary Objects and Embracing Chaos in Collaborative Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 16, 3: 307--339. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Suzanne M. McDonough, Mark A. Tully, Adele Boyd, et al. 2013. Pedometer-driven walking for chronic low back pain: a feasibility randomized controlled trial. The Clinical journal of pain 29, 11: 972--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Helena M. Mentis and Carolina Johansson. 2013. Seeing movement qualities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI '13, 3375. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Helena M. Mentis, Ahmed Rahim, and Pierre Theodore. 2016. Crafting the Image in Surgical Telemedicine. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing CSCW '16, 742--753. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Helena M. Mentis, Rita Shewbridge, Sharon Powell, Melissa Armstrong, Paul Fishman, and Lisa Shulman. 2016. Co-Interpreting Movement With Sensors: Assessing Parkinson's Patients' Deep Brain Stimulation Programming. Human-Computer Interaction 31, 3-4: 227--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Helena M. Mentis, Rita Shewbridge, Sharon Powell, Paul Fishman, and Lisa Shulman. 2015. Being Seen. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI '15, 511--520. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Annemarie Mol. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Annemarie Mol. 2008. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. Routledge, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Marilyn L. Moy, Nicole A. Weston, Elizabeth J. Wilson, Michael L. Hess, and Caroline R. Richardson. 2012. A pilot study of an Internet walking program and pedometer in COPD. Respiratory medicine 106, 9: 1342--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Gina Neff and Dawn Nafus. 2016. Self-Tracking. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Marlies van Nimwegen, Arlène D. Speelman, Esther J. M. Hofman-van Rossum, et al. 2011. Physical inactivity in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Neurology 258, 12: 2214--2221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Mitesh S. Patel, David A. Asch, Kevin G. Volpp, et al. 2015. Wearable Devices as Facilitators, Not Drivers, of Health Behavior Change. JAMA 313, 5: 459.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Amit Prasad. 2005. Making Images/Making Bodies: Visibilizing and Disciplining through Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Science, Technology & Human Values 30, 2: 291--316.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. D. A. Redelmeier and A. Tversky. 1996. On the belief that arthritis pain is related to the weather. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93, 7: 2895--2896.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Ronel Roos, Hellen Myezwa, Helena van Aswegen, and Eustasius Musenge. 2014. Effects of an Education and Home-Based Pedometer Walking Program on Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factors in People Infected with HIV. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 67, 3: 268--276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Hanneke Schuurmans, Nardi Steverink, Siegwart Lindenberg, Nynke Frieswijk, and Joris P. J. Slaets. 2004. Old or frail: what tells us more? The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences 59, 9: M962-5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Lisa M. Shulman, Leslie I. Katzel, Frederick M. Ivey, et al. 2013. Randomized Clinical Trial of 3 Types of Physical Exercise for Patients With Parkinson Disease. JAMA Neurology 70, 2: 183.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Cristiano Storni. The politics of design in Sociotechnical dispositif. Reconciling Healthcare toward a future patient-centric perspective. In Interact.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Thomas Sue and Doug MacMahon. 2004. Parkinson's disease, palliative care and older people: part 2: by reading this article and writing a practice profile, you can gain ten continuing education points (CEPs). You have up to a year to send in your practice profile. Guidelines on how to write. Nursing Older People 16, 2: 22--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Jane E. Sullivan, Lauren E. Espe, Amanda M. Kelly, Laura E. Veilbig, and Mary J. Kwasny. 2014. Feasibility and Outcomes of a Community-Based, Pedometer-Monitored Walking Program in Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Study. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 21, 2: 101--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Sara Urowitz, David Wiljer, Kourtney Dupak, et al. 2012. Improving diabetes management with a patient portal: a qualitative study of diabetes self-management portal. Journal of medical Internet research 14, 6: e158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Peter West, Richard Giordano, Max Van Kleek, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2016. The Quantified Patient in the Doctor's Office. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI '16, 3066--3078. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Crafting a View of Self-Tracking Data in the Clinical Visit

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      7138 pages
      ISBN:9781450346559
      DOI:10.1145/3025453

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader