skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025727acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Competent Men and Warm Women: Gender Stereotypes and Backlash in Image Search Results

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

There is much concern about algorithms that underlie information services and the view of the world they present. We develop a novel method for examining the content and strength of gender stereotypes in image search, inspired by the trait adjective checklist method. We compare the gender distribution in photos retrieved by Bing for the query "person" and for queries based on 68 character traits (e.g., "intelligent person") in four regional markets. Photos of men are more often retrieved for "person," as compared to women. As predicted, photos of women are more often retrieved for warm traits (e.g., "emotional") whereas agentic traits (e.g., "rational") are represented by photos of men. A backlash effect, where stereotype-incongruent individuals are penalized, is observed. However, backlash is more prevalent for "competent women" than "warm men." Results underline the need to understand how and why biases enter search algorithms and at which stages of the engineering process.

References

  1. Colin Allen, Wendell Wallach, and Iva Smit. 2006. Why machine ethics? IEEE Intelligent Systems 21, 4, 12--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Andrea E. Abele and Susanne Bruckmüller. 2011. The bigger one of the "Big Two"? Preferential processing of communal information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47, 935--948.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Andrea E. Abele, Mirjam Uchronski, Caterina Suitner, and Bogdan Wojciszke. 2008. Towards an operationalization of the fundamental dimensions of agency and communion: Trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrence. European Journal of Social Psychology 38, 1202--1217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Leif Azzopardi and Vishwa Vinay. 2008. Retrievability: an evaluation measure for higher order information access tasks. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management (CIKM '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 561--570. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Paul Baker and Amanda Potts. 2013. "Why do White People have Thin Lips?" Google and the Perpetuation of Stereotypes via Auto-complete Search Forms. Critical Discourse Studies 10, 2: 187--204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. S. A. Basow. 1986. Gender Stereotypes: Traditions and Alternatives. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Michelle C. Bligh, Michele M. Schlehofer, Bettina J. Casad, and Amber M. Gaffney. 2012. Competent enough, but would you vote for her? Gender stereotypes and media influences on perceptions of women politicians. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 42, 3: 560--597.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Engin Bozdag. 2013. Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization. Ethics and Information Technology 15, 3: 209--227. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Amy J. Cuddy, Susan T. Fiske, and Peter Glick. 2008. Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map. Advances in Experimental Psychology 40, 61--149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Anupam Datta, Shayak Sen and Yair Zick. 2016. Algorithmic transparency via quantitative input influence. Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, IEEE Computer Society, 598617.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2015. Algorithmic accountability: Journalistic investigation of computational power structures. Digital Journalism 3, 3: 398--415.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Amanda B. Diekman and Alice H. Eagly. 2000. Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26, 10, 1171--1188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Alice H. Eagly, and Steven J. Karau. 2002. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological review 109, 3, 573--598.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Motahhare Eslami, Aimee Rickman, Kristen Vaccaro, Amirhossein Aleyasen, Andy Vuong, Karrie Karahalios, Kevin Hamilton, and Christian Sandvig. 2015. "I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to {her}": Reasoning about Invisible Algorithms in News Feeds. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 153--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Randi Ettner and Antonio Guillamon. 2016. Theories of the Etiology of Transgender Identity. In R. Ettner, S. Monstrey, and E. Coleman (eds.), Principles of Transgender Medicine and Surgery (pp. 3--15). New York: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Brian S. Everitt and Torsten Hothorn. 2009. Statistical Analysis Using R. Chapman and Hall / CRC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Susan T. Fiske, Amy J. C. Cuddy, Peter Glick, and Jun Xu. 2002. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82, 6, 878--902.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Batya Friedman and Helen Nissenbaum. 1996. Bias in computer systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 14, 3: 330--347. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. G.M. Gilbert. 1951. Stereotype persistence and change among college students. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 46, 245--254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Tarleton Gillespie. 2014. The Relevance of Algorithms. Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society: 167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ayşe Göker, Richard Butterworth, Andrew MacFarlane, Tana Ahmed, and Simone Stumpf. 2016. Expeditions through image jungles: the commercial use of image libraries in an online environment. Journal of Documentation 72,1, 5--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. David L. Hamilton and Tina K. Trolier. 1986. Stereotypes and stereotyping: An overview of the cognitive approach. In J. Dovidio and S. L. Gaertner (eds.), Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism (pp. 127--163). New York: Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Aniko Hannak, Piotr Sapiezynski, Arash Molavi Kakhki, Balachander Krishnamurthy, David Lazer, Alan Mislove, and Christo Wilson. 2013. Measuring personalization of web search. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 527--538. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Marvin Karlins, Thomas L. Coffman and Gary Walters. 1969. On the fading of social stereotypes: Studies in three generations of college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 13, 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Daniel Katz and Kenneth Braly. 1933. Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 28, 3, 280--290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Matthew Kay, Cynthia Matuszek, and Sean A. Munson. 2015. Unequal Representation and Gender Stereotypes in Image Search Results for Occupations. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3819--3828. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Elena Konkova, Andrew MacFarlane and Ayşe Göker. 2016. Analysing creative image search information needs. Knowledge Organization 43, 1: 13--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. John D. Lee and Katrina A. See. 2004. Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance. Human Factors 46, 1 (Spring 2004): 50--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. John Ludbrook. 1998. Multiple comparison procedures updated. Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, 25, 12, 1032--1037.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Stephanie Madon, Max Guyll, Kathy Aboufadel, Eulices Montiel, Alison Smith, Polly Palumbo, and Lee Jussim. 2001. Ethnic and national stereotypes: The Princeton Trilogy revisited and revised. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27, 8, 996--1010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Lori McCay-Peet and Elaine Toms. 2009. Image use within the work task model: Images as information and illustration. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 60, 12 (December 2009), 2416--2429. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Corinne A. Moss-Racusin, Julie E. Phelan, and Laurie A. Rudman. 2010. When men break the gender rules: Status incongruity and backlash against modest men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity 11, 2: 140--151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Michael Mudrick. 2015. Pervasively offside: A gendered analysis of sportscasting. Doctoral dissertation, Paper 722. http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/772Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Clifford Nass and Youngme Moon. 2000. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues 56, 1, 81--103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Safiya Umoja Noble. 2012. Missed connections: What search engines say about women. Bitch: Feminist Response to Pop Culture 54 (Spring 2012), 37--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Jahna Otterbacher. 2015. Crowdsourcing Stereotypes: Linguistic Bias in Metadata Generated via GWAP. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1955--1964. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Bing Pan, Helene Hembrooke, Thorsten Joachims, Lori Lorigo, Geri Gay, and Laura Granka. 2007. In Google We Trust: Users' Decisions on Rank, Position, and Relevance. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 12, 3: 801--823.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. James W. Pennebaker, Ryan L. Boyd, Kayla Jordan, and Kate Blackburn. 2015. The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. https://utexasir.tdl.org/bitstream/handle/2152/31333/LIWC2015_LanguageManual.pdf'sequence=3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Emilee Rader and Rebecca Gray. 2015. Understanding User Beliefs About Algorithmic Curation in the Facebook News Feed. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 173--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Laurie A. Rudman and Peter Glick. 2001. Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues 57, 4, 743--762.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Laurie A. Rudman and Julie E. Phelan. 2008. Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Organizational Behavior 28, 61--79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Stefanie Simon and Crystal L. Hoyt. 2012. Exploring the effect of media images on women's leadership self-perceptions and aspirations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 16, 2, 232--245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Charlotte Templin. 1999. Hillary Clinton as threat to gender norms: Cartoon images of the first lady. Journal of Communication Inquiry 23, 1, 20--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Myriam C. Traub, Thaer Samar, Jacco van Ossenbruggen, Jiyin He, Argen de Vries, and Lynda Hardman. 2016. Querylog-based assessment of retrievability bias in a large newspaper corpus. In Proccedings of the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL '16), ACM, Newark, NJ, 7--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Sherry Turkle. 1997. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster. Candace West and Don H. Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender. Gender & society 1.2, 125--151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Candace West and Don H. Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender. Gender & society 1.2, 125--151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Competent Men and Warm Women: Gender Stereotypes and Backlash in Image Search Results

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      7138 pages
      ISBN:9781450346559
      DOI:10.1145/3025453

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader