skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025916acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Modeling Sub-Document Attention Using Viewport Time

Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Website measures of engagement captured from millions of users, such as in-page scrolling and viewport position, can provide deeper understanding of attention than possible with simpler measures, such as dwell time. Using data from 1.2M news reading sessions, we examine and evaluate three increasingly sophisticated models of sub-document attention computed from viewport time, the time a page component is visible on the user display. Our modeling incorporates prior eye-tracking knowledge about onscreen reading, and we validate it by showing how, when used to estimate user reading rate, it aligns with known empirical measures. We then show how our models reveal an interaction between article topic and attention to page elements. Our approach supports refined large-scale measurement of user engagement at a level previously available only from lab-based eye-tracking studies.

References

  1. David M Blei, Andrew Y Ng, and Michael I Jordan. 2003. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3, Jan (2003), 993--1022. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Agnieszka Bojko. 2006. Using Eye Tracking to Compare Web Page Designs: A Case Study. Journal of Usability Studies 1, 3 (May 2006), 112--120. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2835663.2835665 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Georg Buscher, Ralf Biedert, Daniel Heinesch, and Andreas Dengel. 2010. Eye Tracking Analysis of Preferred Reading Regions on the Screen. In CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '10). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 3307--3312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Georg Buscher, Edward Cutrell, and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2009. What Do You See when You'Re Surfing?: Using Eye Tracking to Predict Salient Regions of Web Pages. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Christopher S. Campbell and Paul P. Maglio. 2001. A Robust Algorithm for Reading Detection. In Proceedings of the 2001 Workshop on Perceptive User Interfaces (PUI '01). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mon Chu Chen, John R. Anderson, and Myeong Ho Sohn. 2001. What Can a Mouse Cursor Tell Us More?: Correlation of Eye/Mouse Movements on Web Browsing. In CHI '01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '01). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 281--282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Soussan Djamasbi, Marisa Siegel, and Tom Tullis. 2010. Generation Y, Web Design, and Eye Tracking. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68, 5 (May 2010), 307--323. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Laura Granka, Matthew Feusner, and Lori Lorigo. 2008. Eye Monitoring in Online Search. Passive Eye Monitoring (2008), 347--372.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jeff Huang, Ryen White, and Georg Buscher. 2012. User See, User Point: Gaze and Cursor Alignment in Web Search. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1341--1350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Youngho Kim, Ahmed Hassan, Ryen W. White, and Imed Zitouni. 2014a. Comparing Client and Server Dwell Time Estimates for Click-level Satisfaction Prediction. In Proceedings of the 37th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 895--898. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Youngho Kim, Ahmed Hassan, Ryen W. White, and Imed Zitouni. 2014b. Modeling Dwell Time to Predict Click-level Satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 193--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Dmitry Lagun, Chih-Hung Hsieh, Dale Webster, and Vidhya Navalpakkam. 2014. Towards Better Measurement of Attention and Satisfaction in Mobile Search. In Proceedings of the 37th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 113--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Dmitry Lagun and Mounia Lalmas. 2016. Understanding User Attention and Engagement in Online News Reading. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM '16). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 113--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Dmitry Lagun, Donal McMahon, and Vidhya Navalpakkam. 2016. Understanding Mobile Searcher Attention with Rich Ad Formats. In Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM '16). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 599--608. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Pascual Martínez-Gómez, Tadayoshi Hara, and Akiko Aizawa. 2012. Recognizing Personal Characteristics of Readers using Eye-Movements and Text Features. Proceedings of COLING 2012 December (2012), 1747--1762. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C12--1107Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jan M Noyes and Kate J Garland. 2008. Computer- vs. paper-based tasks: are they equivalent? Ergonomics 51, 9 (2008), 1352--1375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Radim Řehůřek and Petr Sojka. 2010. Software Framework for Topic Modelling with Large Corpora. In Proceedings of the LREC 2010 Workshop on New Challenges for NLP Frameworks. ELRA, Valletta, Malta, 45--50. http://is.muni.cz/publication/884893/en.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Selina Sharmin, Oleg Špakov, and Kari-Jouko Räihä. 2013. Reading On-screen Text with Gaze-based Auto-scrolling. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Eye Tracking South Africa (ETSA '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 24--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski and Klaus Dietz. 2012. Standardized assessment of reading performance: The new international reading speed texts IReST. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 53, 9 (2012), 5452--5461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Eric W Weisstein. 2002. Erf. http://web.archive.org/web/20080207010024/http: //www.808multimedia.com/winnt/kernel.htm. (2002). Retrieved December 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Xing Yi, Liangjie Hong, Erheng Zhong, Nanthan Nan Liu, and Suju Rajan. 2014. Beyond Clicks: Dwell Time for Personalization. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 113--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Modeling Sub-Document Attention Using Viewport Time

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      7138 pages
      ISBN:9781450346559
      DOI:10.1145/3025453

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader