skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3026022acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Survey of the Trajectories Conceptual Framework: Investigating Theory Use in HCI

Published: 02 May 2017 Publication History

Abstract

We present a case study of how Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) theory is reused within the field. We analyze the HCI literature in order to reveal the impact of one particular theory, the trajectories framework that has been cited as an example of both contemporary HCI theory and a strong concept that sits between theory and design practice. Our analysis of 60 papers that seriously engaged with trajectories reveals the purposes that the framework served and which parts of it they used. We compare our findings to the originally stated goals of trajectories and to subsequent claims of its status as both theory and strong concept. The results shed new light on what we mean by theory in HCI, including its relationship to practice and to other disciplines.

References

[1]
Jeffrey Bardzell. 2009. Interaction Criticism and Aesthetics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09), 2357--2366. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1519063
[2]
Christoph Bartneck and Jun Hu. 2009. Scientometric Analysis of the CHI Proceedings. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09), 699--708. http://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518810
[3]
Benjamin B. Bederson and Ben Shneiderman. 2003. The Craft of Information Visualization: Readings and Reflections. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA.
[4]
David Benyon. 2010. Designing Interactive Systems: A Comprehensive Guide to HCI and Interaction Design. Addison Wesley, Harlow, England; New York.
[5]
Kirsten Boehner, Janet Vertesi, Phoebe Sengers, and Paul Dourish. 2007. How HCI Interprets the Probes. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07), 1077--1086. http://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240789
[6]
John M. Carroll (ed.). 2003. HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA.
[7]
Matthew Chalmers and Areti Galani. 2004. Seamful Interweaving: Heterogeneity in the Theory and Design of Interactive Systems. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (DIS '04), 243--252. http://doi.org/10.1145/1013115.1013149
[8]
Andrew Crabtree, Tom Rodden, Peter Tolmie, and Graham Button. 2009. Ethnography Considered Harmful. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09), 879--888. http://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518835
[9]
Alan Dix, Janet E. Finlay, Gregory D. Abowd, and Russell Beale. 2003. Human-Computer Interaction. Pearson, Harlow, England; New York.
[10]
Martin Flintham, Keir Smith, Steve Benford, Mauricio Capra, Jon Green, Chris Greenhalgh, Michael Wright, Matt Adams, Nick Tandavanitj, Ju Row Farr, Irma Lindt. 2007. Day of the Figurines: A Slow NarrativeDriven Game for Mobile Phones Using Text Messaging, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Pervasive Games (Pergames '07).
[11]
William Gaver. 2012. What should we expect from research through design?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 937946. http://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208538
[12]
Jonathan Grudin and Steven Poltrock. 2012. Taxonomy and theory in computer supported cooperative work. Handbook of Organizational Psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 1323--1348.
[13]
Jesper Kjeldskov and Jeni Paay. 2012. A Longitudinal Review of Mobile HCI Research Methods. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '12), 69--78. http://doi.org/10.1145/2371574.2371586
[14]
Jesper Kjeldskov and Mikael B. Skov. 2014. Was It Worth the Hassle?: Ten Years of Mobile HCI Research Discussions on Lab and Field Evaluations. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services (MobileHCI '14), 43--52. http://doi.org/10.1145/2628363.2628398
[15]
Yong Liu, Jorge Goncalves, Denzil Ferreira, Bei Xiao, Simo Hosio, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2014. CHI 19942013: Mapping Two Decades of Intellectual Progress Through Co-word Analysis. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 3553--3562. http://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2556969
[16]
Lokman I. Meho and Yvonne Rogers. 2008. Citation Counting, Citation Ranking, and H-index of Humancomputer Interaction Researchers: A Comparison of Scopus and Web of Science. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 59, 11: 1711--1726. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.v59:11
[17]
Alexander J. Quinn and Benjamin B. Bederson. 2011. Human Computation: A Survey and Taxonomy of a Growing Field. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), 1403--1412. http://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979148
[18]
Dan Ramsden. 2015. User journeys, Trajectories and Transitions for UX designers. Retrieved September 20, 2016 from http://danramsden.com/2015/10/23/userjourneys-trajectories-and-transitions-for-ux-designers/
[19]
Yvonne Rogers. 2004. New theoretical approaches for human-computer interaction. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 38, 1: 87--143. http://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440380103
[20]
Yvonne Rogers. 2012. HCI Theory: Classical, Modern, and Contemporary. Synthesis Lectures on HumanCentered Informatics 5, 2: 1--129. http://doi.org/10.2200/S00418ED1V01Y201205HCI01
[21]
Yvonne Rogers, Helen Sharp, and Jenny Preece. 2011. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.
[22]
Ben Shneiderman, Catherine Plaisant, Maxine Cohen, and Steven Jacobs. 2009. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Pearson, Boston.
[23]
Martin A. Simon. 1993. Reconstructing Mathematics Pedagogy from a Constructivist Perspective. Retrieved September 20, 2016 from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED364406
[24]
Christa Sommerer and Laurent Mignonneau. 1999. Art as a living system: interactive computer artworks. Leonardo 32, 3: 165--173.
[25]
Tracee Vetting Wolf, Jennifer A. Rode, Jeremy Sussman, and Wendy A. Kellogg. 2006. Dispelling "Design" As the Black Art of CHI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), 521--530. http://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124853
[26]
David Wood, Jerome S. Bruner, and Gail Ross. 1976. The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 17, 2: 89--100. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469--7610.1976.tb00381.x
[27]
Steve Benford and Gabriella Giannachi. 2008. Temporal Trajectories in Shared Interactive Narratives. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08), 73--82. http://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357067
[28]
Steve Benford and Gabriella Giannachi. 2011. Performing Mixed Reality. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
[29]
Steve Benford, Gabriella Giannachi, Boriana Koleva, and Tom Rodden. 2009. From interaction to trajectories: designing coherent journeys through user experiences. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09), 709--718. http://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518812
[30]
Steve Benford. 2010. Performing Musical Interaction: Lessons from the Study of Extended Theatrical Performances. Computer Music Journal 34, 4: 49--61. http://doi.org/10.1162/COMJ_a_00025
[31]
Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Andy Crabtree, et al. 2013. Performance-Led Research in the Wild. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 20, 3: 14:1--14:22. http://doi.org/10.1145/2491500.2491502
[32]
Steve Benford, Adrian Hazzard, Alan Chamberlain, et al. 2016. Accountable Artefacts: The Case of the Carolan Guitar. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 1163--1175. http://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858306
[33]
Steve Benford, Irma Lindt, Andy Crabtree, et al. 2011. Creating the spectacle: Designing interactional trajectories through spectator interfaces. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 18, 3: 1--28. http://doi.org/10.1145/1993060.1993061
[34]
Dimitrios Paris Darzentas, Michael A. Brown, Martin Flintham, and Steve Benford. 2015. The Data Driven Lives of Wargaming Miniatures. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 2427--2436. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702377
[35]
Abigail Durrant, David S. Kirk, Steve Benford, and Tom Rodden. 2011. Pursuing Leisure: Reflections on Theme Park Visiting. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 21, 1: 43--79. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-011--9151--1
[36]
Martin Flintham, Stuart Reeves, Patrick Brundell, et al. 2011. Flypad: Designing trajectories in a large-scale permanent augmented reality installation. In ECSCW 2011: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 24--28 September 2011, Aarhus Denmark, 233--252. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-0--85729--913-0_13
[37]
Lesley Fosh, Steve Benford, and Boriana Koleva. 2016. Supporting Group Coherence in a Museum Visit. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16), 1--12. http://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819970
[38]
Lesley Fosh, Steve Benford, Stuart Reeves, Boriana Koleva, and Patrick Brundell. 2013. See Me, Feel Me, Touch Me, Hear Me: Trajectories and Interpretation in a Sculpture Garden. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), 149--158. http://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470675
[39]
Joe Marshall, Steve Benford, and Tony Pridmore. 2010. Deception and Magic in Collaborative Interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10), 567--576. http://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753410
[40]
Joe Marshall, Florian "Floyd" Mueller, Steve Benford, and Sebastiaan Pijnappel. 2016. Expanding exertion gaming. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 90: 1--13. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.02.003
[41]
Stefan Rennick-Egglestone, Patrick Brundell, Boriana Koleva, Steve Benford, Maria Roussou, and Christophe Chaffardon. 2016. Families and Mobile Devices in Museums: Designing for Integrated Experiences. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 9, 2: 11:1--11:13. http://doi.org/10.1145/2891416
[42]
Stefan Rennick-Egglestone, Maria Roussou, Patrick Brundell, Christophe Chaffardon, Vassilis Kourtis, Boriana Koleva, Steve Benford. 2013. Indoors and outdoors: designing mobile experiences for Cité de 1'espace. In Proceedings of NODEM 2013. NODEM, Kista, Sweden. Retrieved September 10, 2016 from http://repo.nodem.org/?objectId=111
[43]
Raphael Velt, Steve Benford, Stuart Reeves, Michael Evans, Maxine Glancy, and Phil Stenton. 2015. Towards an Extended Festival Viewing Experience. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (TVX '15), 53--62. http://doi.org/10.1145/2745197.2745206
[44]
Anne Adams, Elizabeth Fitzgerald, and Gary Priestnall. 2013. Of Catwalk Technologies and Boundary Creatures. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 20, 3: 15:1--15:34. http://doi.org/10.1145/2491500.2491503
[45]
Gabriella Arrigoni and Brigitta Zics. 2016. Fiction and curatorial practice: developing alternative experiences for digital artistic prototypes. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media 12, 1: 82--94. http://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2015.1133960
[46]
Evan Barba. 2014. A theory of meaning for Mixed Reality walking tours. In 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality - Media, Art, Social Science, Humanities and Design (ISMARMASH'D), 43--50. http://doi.org/10.1109/ISMARAMH.2014.6935437
[47]
Evan Barba and Blair MacIntyre. 2011. A Scale Model of Mixed Reality. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C '11), 117--126. http://doi.org/10.1145/2069618.2069640
[48]
David Benyon. 2012. Presence in Blended Spaces. Interact. Comput. 24, 4: 219--226. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2012.04.005
[49]
David Benyon, Kristina Höök, and Laurence Nigay. 2010. Spaces of Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-BCS Visions of Computer Science Conference (ACM-BCS '10), 2:1--2:7. Retrieved September 6, 2016 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1811182.1811185
[50]
David Benyon and Oli Mival. 2015. Blended Spaces for Collaboration. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 24, 2--3: 223--249. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-015--9223--8
[51]
David Benyon, Oli Mival, and Serkan Ayan. 2012. Designing Blended Spaces. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual BCS Interaction Specialist Group Conference on People and Computers (BCS-HCI '12), 398--403. Retrieved September 6, 2016 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2377916.2377974
[52]
Elizabeth Bonsignore, Vicki Moulder, Carman Neustaedter, Derek Hansen, Kari Kraus, and Allison Druin. 2014. Design Tactics for Authentic Interactive Fiction: Insights from Alternate Reality Game Designers. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 947--950. http://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557245
[53]
Anne E. Bowser, Derek L. Hansen, Jocelyn Raphael, et al. 2013. Prototyping in PLACE: A Scalable Approach to Developing Location-based Apps and Games. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), 1519--1528. http://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466202
[54]
Richard Byrne, Joe Marshall, and Florian Floyd Mueller. 2016. Designing the Vertigo Experience: Vertigo As a Design Resource for Digital Bodily Play. In Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '16), 296--303. http://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2839465
[55]
Ilaria Canova Calori, Chiara Rossitto, and Monica Divitini. 2013. Understanding Trajectories of Experience in Situated Learning Field Trips. IxD&A 16: 17--26.
[56]
Teresa Cerratto-Pargman, Chiara Rossitto, and Louise Barkhuus. 2014. Understanding Audience Participation in an Interactive Theater Performance. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (NordiCHI '14), 608--617. http://doi.org/10.1145/2639189.2641213
[57]
Tim Coughlan, Anne Adams, and Yvonne Rogers. 2010. Designing for Balance: Out There and In Here. In Proceedings of the 24th BCS Interaction Specialist Group Conference (BCS '10), 468--473. Retrieved September 6, 2016 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2146303.2146377
[58]
Peter Dalsgaard, Christian Dindler, and Kim Halskov. 2011. Understanding the Dynamics of Engaging Interaction in Public Spaces. In Proceedings of the 13th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Humancomputer Interaction - Volume Part II (INTERACT'11), 212--229. Retrieved September 20, 2016 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2042118.2042140
[59]
Ben Freeth, John Bowers, and Bennett Hogg. 2014. Musical Meshworks: From Networked Performance to Cultures of Exchange. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '14), 219--228. http://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598583
[60]
Gesa Friederichs-Büttner, Benjamin Walther-Franks, and Rainer Malaka. 2012. An Unfinished Drama: Designing Participation for the Theatrical Dance Performance Parcival XX-XI. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12), 770--778. http://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318072
[61]
Sabiha Ghellal, Ann Morrison, Marc Hassenzahl, and Benjamin Schaufler. 2014. The Remediation of Nosferatu: Exploring Transmedia Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '14), 617--626. http://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2600881
[62]
Derek Hansen, Elizabeth Bonsignore, Marc Ruppel, Amanda Visconti, and Kari Kraus. 2013. Designing Reusable Alternate Reality Games. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), 1529--1538. http://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466203
[63]
Kristina Höök and Jonas Löwgren. 2012. Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Transactions on ComputerHuman Interaction 19, 3: 1--18. http://doi.org/10.1145/2362364.2362371
[64]
Eva Hornecker. 2016. The To-and-Fro of Sense Making: Supporting Users' Active Indexing in Museums. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 23, 2: 10:1--10:48. http://doi.org/10.1145/2882785
[65]
Chung-Ching Huang and Erik Stolterman. 2011. Temporality in Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (DPPI '11), 62:1--62:8. http://doi.org/10.1145/2347504.2347572
[66]
Alexander Kan, Martin Gibbs, and Bernd Ploderer. 2013. Being Chased by Zombies!: Understanding the Experience of Mixed Reality Quests. In Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration (OzCHI '13), 207--216. http://doi.org/10.1145/2541016.2541038
[67]
Michael Leitner, Bernhard Wöckl, Özge Subasi, and Manfred Tschelgi. 2010. Towards the Use of "Negative Effects" in Technology Design and Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 24th BCS Interaction Specialist Group Conference (BCS '10), 443--447. Retrieved September 6, 2016 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2146303.2146371
[68]
Janet van der Linden, Yvonne Rogers, Tim Coughlan, et al. 2013. Evocative Computing -- Creating Meaningful Lasting Experiences in Connecting with the Past. In INTERACT 2013 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), 529--546. http://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--642--40483--2_38
[69]
Janet van der Linden, Yvonne Rogers, Maria Oshodi, et al. 2011. Haptic Reassurance in the Pitch Black for an Immersive Theatre Experience. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '11), 143--152. http://doi.org/10.1145/2030112.2030133
[70]
Christopher Lindinger, Martina Mara, Klaus Obermaier, Roland Aigner, Roland Haring, and Veronika Pauser. 2013. The (St)Age of Participation: audience involvement in interactive performances. Digital Creativity 24, 2: 119--129. http://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.808966
[71]
Sus Lundgren. 2013. Toying with Time: Considering Temporal Themes in Interactive Artifacts. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), 1639--1648. http://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466217
[72]
Sus Lundgren, Joel E. Fischer, Stuart Reeves, and Olof Torgersson. 2015. Designing Mobile Experiences for Collocated Interaction. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15), 496--507. http://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675171
[73]
Michael Massimi, William Odom, Richard Banks, and David Kirk. 2011. Matters of Life and Death: Locating the End of Life in Lifespan-oriented Hci Research. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), 987--996. http://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979090
[74]
Deborah Maxwell, Chris Speed, Karl Monsen, and Diego Zamora. 2015. Creating a Collaborative Space for Creativity Through a Pervasive User Experience. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C '15), 255--264. http://doi.org/10.1145/2757226.2757234
[75]
Sara Said Mosleh, Nele Schmidt, Tudor Teisanu, and Andrés Lucero. 2015. EgoFlecto: Stimulating Being Calm and in Control Through Self-reflection in the Context of Driving. In Proceedings of the 19th International Academic Mindtrek Conference (AcademicMindTrek '15), 92--97. http://doi.org/10.1145/2818187.2818276
[76]
Valentina Nisi, Enrico Costanza, and Mara Dionisio. 2016. Placing Location-Based Narratives in Context Through a Narrator and Visual Markers. Interacting with Computers. http://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iww020
[77]
Bettina Nissen, John Bowers, Peter Wright, Jonathan Hook, and Christopher Newell. 2014. Volvelles, Domes and Wristbands: Embedding Digital Fabrication Within a Visitor's Trajectory of Engagement. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '14), 825--834. http://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598524
[78]
Brian O'Keefe and David Benyon. 2015. Using the blended spaces framework to design heritage stories with schoolchildren. International Journal of ChildComputer Interaction 6: 7--16. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2016.02.001
[79]
Stefan Rennick-Egglestone, Sarah Knowles, Gill Toms, Penny Bee, Karina Lovell, and Peter Bower. 2016. Health Technologies "In the Wild": Experiences of Engagement with Computerised CBT. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 2124--2135. http://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858128
[80]
Chiara Rossitto, Louise Barkhuus, and Arvid Engström. 2016. Interweaving Place and Story in a Location-based Audio Drama. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 20, 2: 245--260. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-016-0908-x
[81]
Shenando Stals, Michael Smyth, and Wijnand Ijsselsteijn. 2014. Walking & Talking: Probing the Urban Lived Experience. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (NordiCHI '14), 737--746. http://doi.org/10.1145/2639189.2641215
[82]
Petra Sundström, Axel Baumgartner, Elke Beck, et al. 2014. Gaming to Sit Safe: The Restricted Body As an Integral Part of Gameplay. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '14), 715--724. http://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2600882
[83]
Nick Taylor, Tom Bartindale, John Vines, and Patrick Olivier. 2014. Exploring Delegate Engagement with an Augmented Conference. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '14), 833--843. http://doi.org/10.1145/2632048.2632068
[84]
Robyn Taylor, John Bowers, Bettina Nissen, et al. 2015. Making Magic: Designing for Open Interactions in Museum Settings. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C '15), 313--322. http://doi.org/10.1145/2757226.2757241
[85]
Robyn Taylor, Guy Schofield, John Shearer, Peter Wright, Pierre Boulanger, and Patrick Olivier. 2014. Nightingallery: theatrical framing and orchestration in participatory performance. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18, 7: 1583--1600. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0763--6
[86]
Joshua Underwood, Rosemary Luckin, and Niall Winters. 2011. Retelling Stories: Setting Learner Narratives in Resource Ecologies. In Proceedings of the 9th International Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference (CSCL 2011), 611--615. Retrieved September 12, 2016 from https://www.academia.edu/4633789/Retelling_Stories_ Setting_Learner_Narratives_in_Resource_Ecologies
[87]
Niels Wouters, John Downs, Mitchell Harrop, et al. 2016. Uncovering the Honeypot Effect: How Audiences Engage with Public Interactive Systems. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16), 5--16. http://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901796
[88]
Daniel Yule, Bonnie MacKay, and Derek Reilly. 2015. Operation Citadel: Exploring the Role of Docents in Mixed Reality. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY '15), 285--294. http://doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2793135
[89]
Farnaz Zangouei, Mohammad Ali Babazadeh Gashti, Kristina Höök, Tim Tijs, Gert-Jan de Vries, and Joyce Westerink. 2010. How to Stay in the Emotional Rollercoaster: Lessons Learnt from Designing EmRoll. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (NordiCHI '10), 571--580. http://doi.org/10.1145/1868914.1868978

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)An Umbrella Review of Reporting Quality in CHI Systematic Reviews: Guiding Questions and Best Practices for HCIACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/368526631:5(1-55)Online publication date: 31-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Self-Determination Theory and HCI Games Research: Unfulfilled Promises and Unquestioned ParadigmsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/367323031:3(1-74)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Blueprints: Systematizing Behavior Change Designs—The Case of Social Comparison TheoryACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/361736431:1(1-32)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. A Survey of the Trajectories Conceptual Framework: Investigating Theory Use in HCI

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    May 2017
    7138 pages
    ISBN:9781450346559
    DOI:10.1145/3025453
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 02 May 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. hci
    2. strong concepts
    3. theory
    4. trajectories

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    CHI '17
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 600 of 2,400 submissions, 25%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI 2025
    ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)128
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)An Umbrella Review of Reporting Quality in CHI Systematic Reviews: Guiding Questions and Best Practices for HCIACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/368526631:5(1-55)Online publication date: 31-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Self-Determination Theory and HCI Games Research: Unfulfilled Promises and Unquestioned ParadigmsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/367323031:3(1-74)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2024
    • (2023)Blueprints: Systematizing Behavior Change Designs—The Case of Social Comparison TheoryACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/361736431:1(1-32)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2023
    • (2023)“Anything a Guardian Does Is Canonical”: Player Understanding of Canon in DestinyProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36110297:CHI PLAY(237-263)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Toward Understanding the Design of Intertwined Human–Computer IntegrationsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/359076630:5(1-45)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2023
    • (2023)Literature Reviews in HCI: A Review of ReviewsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581332(1-24)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2022)Why Users Hack: Conflicting Interests and the Political Economy of SoftwareProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35557746:CSCW2(1-26)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Warm Solutions: Centering Nurse Contributions in Medical MakingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35557716:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Risk, Resilience and Reward: Impacts of Shifting to Digital Sex WorkProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35556506:CSCW2(1-37)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Alignment Work for Urban Accessibility: A Study of How Wheelchair Users Travel in Urban SpacesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35551656:CSCW2(1-22)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media